BamaD
Posts: 20687
Joined: 2/27/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WhoreMods quote:
ORIGINAL: heavyblinker In Europe, coalitions are the norm. In Denmark for example there is a coalition of right wing parties and a coalition of left wing parties, and whichever side gets the most votes wins-- and whichever party on that side gets the most votes has the most influence on policy, with concessions given to the others based on their degree of representation within the parliament. It lends a sense of legitimacy to ALL parties, and there are several-- free market libertarians, fascists, traditional conservatives, moderates, social democrats, socialists, communists, etc. The biggest drawback with coalitions is that they can quickly legitimize extremist elements, but since that has happened in the US anyways, and in the most horrible fashion, it doesn't seem to be such a big worry anymore. Sadly, the cod-classical set up you have over there works quite effectively to make a hung parliament that would require a coalition forming to produce a ruling majority impossible. Having two separate houses of representatives and a President who isn't a member of either rather than a parliament is just as big a block on that sort of arrangement as the electoral college, sadly. Coalitions were Hitlers path to power, nothing like him comes out of the two party system.
_____________________________
Government ranges from a necessary evil to an intolerable one. Thomas Paine People don't believe they can defend themselves because they have guns, they have guns because they believe they can defend themselves.
|