Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Genocide then


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Genocide then Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
[Poll]

Genocide then


Yes
  36% (4)
No
  36% (4)
Maybe there is room for doubt about ALL muslims
  27% (3)


Total Votes : 11


(last vote on : 2/1/2017 6:25:36 PM)
(Poll will run till: -- )
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Genocide then - 1/30/2017 11:55:34 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11339
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

First, Voltair renounced his play and statements against Islam in A Treatise on Tolerance, something you would have known had you actually done any real research, attended something other than a high school or actually thought to read something other than some Islamophobic propaganda.


Thanks for the link. I just had a look at it, it has nothing to do with Islam or the previous quote. Only confirmed my earlier suspicion that your mind is wasted, and that the meaningless gibberish that you post is unworthy of my or anyone else's further time.





You better read it again you brainless wonder, or any of the other sources I mentioned.

Or did you decide to ignore the one where Voltair clearly praises Mohammad?

It is typical of close minded conservatives who want nothing more than to justify intolerance, ignorance and racism.

You are proving, in the most blatant fashion that closeminded following of the current agenda of racism by the extreme right is the way of the future.

Funny thing about the quotes and statements you have been making, they can be traced almost word for word to individuals who have also published antisemitic rants dealing with Jews, white supremacist publications on African Americans and the fact that negroid peoples are basically sub human.

Tell you what, go down to the local public library (big building with books you can get on loan) and get the damn thing and read it.

Now it may be difficult for you to comprehend, so I suggest you purchase a college dictionary, and I warn you, there are no pictures.

If there is a college in your town, I can assure you that their library will have a copy, since, as I said, it is required reading for philosophy majors.

You can purchase a copy from Barnes and Noble, I believe that a used copy online is about 15 bucks.


Islam isn't a race, Einstein.

You aren't worth my time

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Genocide then - 1/30/2017 11:58:08 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

First, Voltair renounced his play and statements against Islam in A Treatise on Tolerance, something you would have known had you actually done any real research, attended something other than a high school or actually thought to read something other than some Islamophobic propaganda.


Thanks for the link. I just had a look at it, it has nothing to do with Islam or the previous quote. Only confirmed my earlier suspicion that your mind is wasted, and that the meaningless gibberish that you post is unworthy of my or anyone else's further time.




You better read it again you brainless wonder



pompous ass---you linked a 12 page sampler, in which there is absolutely nothing about islam or Muhammad. and you want to criticize someone else for being a brainless wonder?

and that said, as I noted in a post I just recently made, praising Muhammad on the one hand is not mutually exclusive from criticizing islam on the other.

meanwhile, please get to work on all those Koran quotes taken out of context. im eager to learn.

and being a fan of fox news, im also very curious concerning all the propaganda about islam they are feeding us.



< Message edited by bounty44 -- 1/30/2017 12:28:51 PM >

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Genocide then - 1/30/2017 1:26:44 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

First, Voltair renounced his play and statements against Islam in A Treatise on Tolerance, something you would have known had you actually done any real research, attended something other than a high school or actually thought to read something other than some Islamophobic propaganda.


Thanks for the link. I just had a look at it, it has nothing to do with Islam or the previous quote. Only confirmed my earlier suspicion that your mind is wasted, and that the meaningless gibberish that you post is unworthy of my or anyone else's further time.




You better read it again you brainless wonder



pompous ass---you linked a 12 page sampler, in which there is absolutely nothing about islam or Muhammad. and you want to criticize someone else for being a brainless wonder?

and that said, as I noted in a post I just recently made, praising Muhammad on the one hand is not mutually exclusive from criticizing islam on the other.

meanwhile, please get to work on all those Koran quotes taken out of context. im eager to learn.

and being a fan of fox news, im also very curious concerning all the propaganda about islam they are feeding us.





Oh yes, I did didnt I? Perhaps as a challenge to find out just where I might have gone with that link? Maybe to force a closed minded fool to actually exercise his or her brain?

But since neither of you can be bothered to find the truth, even when spoon fed enough that the curiosity of even an egotist would be piqued, because there had to be something in that long essay that bore fruit to those who seek enlightenment...

But then, I forgot, the truth has to be spoon fed to the masses in America today, those who follow every word of FOX news and MSNBC as gospel from new age prophets.

So since the hint was not strong enough to go in search of the truth, that Voltair had indeed renounced his claims and statements, I give you the source, in its entirity.

Now, it would have been more fun to have presented it in the original French, but then the pair of you probably could not find the little command in most browsers to translate it.

So, sir fool, enjoy the read.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Genocide then - 1/30/2017 4:20:11 PM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
sorry, you messed up, and now youre engaged in a pitifully poor attempt at cya.

also, youre not the arbiter of truth nor the only seeker of it. see my previous epithet of "pompous ass."

whats more---in the full text you just provided, there is no mention of "islam" or "Mahomet" or "play." there are plenty uses of the word "prophet" but none of them refer to Muhammad (in whatever spelling). in short, there is no reference to the "play" which supposedly (according to you) he renounced in his writing here.

further, all mentions of mohammed, or mohammedans don't address his earlier comments about islam either, nor give any strong indication of what his full and present thoughts were at the time about either of them.

so there is no "renouncing" here, at least in an acute sense, by his direct and succinct words. if you want to read the entire piece and make a more comprehensive argument, that's another story, but that's not what you're putting forth.

so lemme recap---first you posted a 12 page sample of a whole work, pretended that you meant to, then you posted the whole work, and theres pretty much nothing in it to support your position. do I have that right?

while im at it---scholars (you know, all the bragging you are doing about your education and your intellectual prowess) don't throw sources at other people and tell them "go find my argument yourself." they provide the evidence themselves.

your position is Voltaire renounced his earlier comments about islam. show it; or really, shut up.

and just to help you along the way---showing subsequent statements that indicate some praise for the religion, or the man behind it, is not the same as renouncing previous statements. this is especially true given this:

quote:

According to Ahmad Gunny, Voltaire's views about Islam remained negative, and he considered the Quran to ignore the laws of physics.[139] Thus, there are a number of representations of Mohammed by Voltaire, separated, generally, into two categories: a religious one, according to which Mohammed is a prophet like the others, who exploits people's naivety and spreads superstition and fanaticism; and a political one, according to which Mohammed was a legislator who brought his contemporaries out of idolatry.[140][141] According to Diego Venturino, the figure of Mohammed is uncertain or negative in Voltaire's view, as Voltaire applauds the legislator but hates the conqueror and the pontiff, who established his religion through violence.[142][143][144]

According to Malise Ruthven, Voltaire developed a more favorable opinion of Islam with greater knowledge of the religion. Ruthven notes that after his harrowing adventures in Europe and Latin America, Candide finds tranquility in Ottoman-era Anatolia to "cultivate his garden"[116]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voltaire


by the way, will be looking for all those "quotes out of context" and the dozens of "fox news propaganda" illustrations still!

if you are using this as a way to feel better about yourself, I suggest you try something else.


< Message edited by bounty44 -- 1/30/2017 4:27:05 PM >

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Genocide then - 1/30/2017 6:05:04 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
You are aware that even the most rudimentary online college for profit does not consider wikipedia a legitimate source for material?

As for the stuff taken out of context, well gee, every fucking time YOU quote the Hadith. Specifically, just the verse, since the actual book includes context.

The same is true for the bible, which extreme right wing fuck nuts pull verses out of context to justify everything from murder to racism.

But maybe that is different, since it is the Bible?

But, since you insist that Voltair never renounced his views on Islam, how about his views on Christianity and the bible?

Lets see, he was, according to your wikipedia link, a polygenist, which means that he rejected the biblical story of creation, which pretty much negates the entire bible from that point onward.

Of course the other source that supported his renouncing of his views you have not read? Which begs the question, do you just want to poke holes in one argument, which is widely accepted by many as proof he changed his views, or is it because you have barely mastered the use google, and anything beyond Wikipedia is out of your league?

But, consider this argument.

If the Koran does not support terrorism or out right murder of Christians and Jews, could there be another motivation, not based in religion?

What could that be?

Perhaps it may go as far back as WW1?

The British needed allies to fight the Ottoman Empire in the middle eastern areas made up of Iraq, Iran, Syria, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and Lebanon.

So they sent T. E. Lawrence in to negotiate an alliance, and he was told that the British and her allies would support any deal he made.

The deal he made was for the Arabs to help Britain and in return, when the Ottoman Empire was defeated, the Arabs get Independence.

Didnt happen, Saudi Arabia got semi autonomy, the rest of the middle east was divided up between France and Great Britain and the Arabs got fucked.

Of course for the next few decades, European colonial rule was far from fair. In many respects, it was worse than the rule of the Ottomans.

In point of fact, the oldest Islamic Extremist organizations date from that era.

Of course, as the European powers did come around to granting independence to the fucked over, they ignored ethnic and sect conflicts and randomly drew lines on the map to create new countries.

Gee, how would you feel if suddenly you found yourself in a country where the majority of the citizens looked at you and those who shared your beliefs as someone to be exterminated for heresy? Laws passed favoring the majority, which was not you?

Of course, before the new maps were made, these issues were brought up to the British and French who basically didnt listen.

So, you go from the Turks trying to exterminate your way of life, to the French and British treating you as nothing more than paid slaves to getting your independence and citizenship in a country where the majority or people want to see you dead?

Gee, not much of a reason to start blowing the hell our of people is there?

Okay well that is a reason for terrorist attacks against Europe, not the US...

Except that in 1948, the UN created Israel.

And while the US did not OVERTLY support the Israelis in their war of Independence, they supplied free of charge, aircraft, ammo, guns, bombs, and quite a few 'retired' WW2 vets from the US fought on the side of the Israelis, as paid mercs, with checks coming from various front agencies that were first created to fund the AVG.

Jump to the seventies.

Hamas, the PLO or whoever pulls an attack that has Americans killed, as well as Jews. Israel retaliates, the US retaliates, innocent Muslims die.

Or hell, look at the latest Iraqi war.

Over 250,000 Iraqi civilians killed due to being caught in the crossfire. Men, women and children. None with a gun or IED.

Dead at American hands.

And you think the ONLY reasons they are pulling terrorist attacks are religion?

Jesus, man use your brain, do the math.

Since the Nixon Era, collateral casualties due to raids by the US in retaliation until now is easily in excess of half a million, when you add the collateral casualties from Iraq and Afghanistan.

And before Bush sr got pissed off at Saddam, we were supplying him with arms and supporting his war against Iraq, and we said absolutely nothing concerning his use of chemical weapons against Iranian troops. Hell we didnt say shit when he tested them on Kurds inside his own borders.

We cut off his support when he starts getting technology from the soviets that would give him a nuclear weapons capability, the Israelis blow up his reactor, with F16's supplied by us.

Man the US has been playing one side off the other for decades. And the only reason you people can come up with for Islamic extremism is religion.

No other reason is possible?

Sweet mother, what do you have between your ears? Lead?

Islam is a religion of hate and war.

Well, if it is, man we helped make it that way by blowing the fucking hell out of everyone every time we get hurt.

Blow the hell out of my town because some terrorist may or may not be living there who was involved in a bombing that killed Americans, I might get more than a little pissed off and volunteer to help kill more of those godless bastards that blew my house up.

Wouldnt you?

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Genocide then - 1/30/2017 6:33:58 PM   
MrRodgers


Posts: 10542
Joined: 7/30/2005
Status: offline
You guys confirm Hitchen's postulation that 'God Is Not Great: How religion poisons everything"

One of his greatest books.

HERE

_____________________________

You can be a murderous tyrant and the world will remember you fondly but fuck one horse and you will be a horse fucker for all eternity. Catherine the Great

Under capitalism, man exploits man. Under communism, it's just the opposite.
J K Galbraith

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Genocide then - 1/31/2017 3:39:58 AM   
bounty44


Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014
Status: offline
I am aware that I spent years as a college faculty and that my colleagues and I considered Wikipedia was as good as the references used in it or the author of the page.

im also aware that that you will not/cannot do the things asked of you which are necessary to support your accusatory premises.

the rest, as has been already noted by others, cause me to agree with the moniker "blowhard."

but that doesn't mean, especially as I reread your last post, that ive "renounced" my earlier statements of "pompous ass."



< Message edited by bounty44 -- 1/31/2017 3:41:52 AM >

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Genocide then - 1/31/2017 5:29:11 AM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

I am aware that I spent years as a college faculty and that my colleagues and I considered Wikipedia was as good as the references used in it or the author of the page.

im also aware that that you will not/cannot do the things asked of you which are necessary to support your accusatory premises.

the rest, as has been already noted by others, cause me to agree with the moniker "blowhard."

but that doesn't mean, especially as I reread your last post, that ive "renounced" my earlier statements of "pompous ass."




And you still have not answered two questions.

1) is there another solution besides wiping out every Muslim on the planet?

2) is there a possibility that the terrorism thing is fueled by something other than religion?


I mean a million plus non combatant casualties over the last 60 years may have influenced one or two to blow themselves up.

As for me being a pompous ass, maybe.

But as for wikipedia being an accepted source for academic research: What's Wrong with Wikipedia?


quote:

Nevertheless, when you're doing academic research, you should be extremely cautious about using Wikipedia. As its own disclaimer states, information on Wikipedia is contributed by anyone who wants to post material, and the expertise of the posters is not taken into consideration. Users may be reading information that is outdated or that has been posted by someone who is not an expert in the field or by someone who wishes to provide misinformation. (Case in point: Four years ago, an Expos student who was writing a paper about the limitations of Wikipedia posted a fictional entry for himself, stating that he was the mayor of a small town in China. Four years later, if you type in his name, or if you do a subject search on Wikipedia for mayors of towns in China, you will still find this fictional entry.) Some information on Wikipedia may well be accurate, but because experts do not review the site's entries, there is a considerable risk in relying on this source for your essays.


Then there is from wikipedia itself.

Or this

or this

But you claim that wikipedia is an acceptable source?

Seriously?

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Genocide then - 1/31/2017 7:17:48 AM   
WhoreMods


Posts: 10691
Joined: 5/6/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

I am aware that I spent years as a college faculty and that my colleagues and I considered Wikipedia was as good as the references used in it or the author of the page.

Cool. I didn't realise that they gave the janitors tenure as well as the academics.

_____________________________

On the level and looking for a square deal.

(in reply to bounty44)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Genocide then - 1/31/2017 8:13:39 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
'A COLLEGE FACULTY' Definitely not a tenured janitor in the English department.

Not college anything at all.

Q.E.D.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to WhoreMods)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Genocide then - 1/31/2017 8:26:00 AM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

I am aware that I spent years as a college faculty and that my colleagues and I considered Wikipedia was as good as the references used in it or the author of the page.

im also aware that that you will not/cannot do the things asked of you which are necessary to support your accusatory premises.

the rest, as has been already noted by others, cause me to agree with the moniker "blowhard."

but that doesn't mean, especially as I reread your last post, that ive "renounced" my earlier statements of "pompous ass."




And you still have not answered two questions.

1) is there another solution besides wiping out every Muslim on the planet?

2) is there a possibility that the terrorism thing is fueled by something other than religion?


I mean a million plus non combatant casualties over the last 60 years may have influenced one or two to blow themselves up.

As for me being a pompous ass, maybe.

But as for wikipedia being an accepted source for academic research: What's Wrong with Wikipedia?


quote:

Nevertheless, when you're doing academic research, you should be extremely cautious about using Wikipedia. As its own disclaimer states, information on Wikipedia is contributed by anyone who wants to post material, and the expertise of the posters is not taken into consideration. Users may be reading information that is outdated or that has been posted by someone who is not an expert in the field or by someone who wishes to provide misinformation. (Case in point: Four years ago, an Expos student who was writing a paper about the limitations of Wikipedia posted a fictional entry for himself, stating that he was the mayor of a small town in China. Four years later, if you type in his name, or if you do a subject search on Wikipedia for mayors of towns in China, you will still find this fictional entry.) Some information on Wikipedia may well be accurate, but because experts do not review the site's entries, there is a considerable risk in relying on this source for your essays.


Then there is from wikipedia itself.

Or this

or this

But you claim that wikipedia is an acceptable source?

Seriously?


I think there really needs to be some kind of court case that determines what aspects of Islam is a religion, and therefore protected, and what aspects are not considered part of the religion, and therefore not protected.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Genocide then - 1/31/2017 8:28:59 AM   
Greta75


Posts: 9968
Joined: 2/6/2011
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961

Everyone in favor of exterminating 1.6 Billion men, women and children who happen to be Muslim on the planet, since we have been informed that that all are being taught to kill non Muslims on sight.

I want to destroy the ideology Islam. Muslims can un-Muslims themselves. Just like Nazis can un-Nazi themselves.

Islam is just an ideology like Nazism. So those people can leave their religion and no longer be Muslims.

We don't have to kill them to achieve that. WE need to stop falsifying information to the world that Islam is peaceful.

There is a reason why Nazism cannot be a striving ideology today because, the world denounces it as bad.

Once the world can just be honest for once and stop recognizing Islam as a peaceful religion, Muslims can start leaving Islam.

So the goal is to make 1.6billion Muslims abandon their religion. And not kill them. As many of them are not even Muslims by choice. Too many Muslims Nations have death penalty and Jail terms for apostates for them to have any choice in being Muslims. Thus they don't deserve death for what is being forced upon them by their evil religion.

We should be saving them from Islam.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Genocide then - 1/31/2017 8:33:27 AM   
BoscoX


Posts: 11339
Joined: 12/10/2016
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

I think there really needs to be some kind of court case that determines what aspects of Islam is a religion, and therefore protected, and what aspects are not considered part of the religion, and therefore not protected.



Would Jim Jones' commune be protected? Bill Clinton had the Branch Davidians burned alive - men, women and children. There are limits to what death / rape cults can get away with, but for whatever reason, the alt left is in love with this one

_____________________________

Thought Criminal

(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Genocide then - 1/31/2017 9:09:13 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

I think there really needs to be some kind of court case that determines what aspects of Islam is a religion, and therefore protected, and what aspects are not considered part of the religion, and therefore not protected.



Would Jim Jones' commune be protected? Bill Clinton had the Branch Davidians burned alive - men, women and children. There are limits to what death / rape cults can get away with, but for whatever reason, the alt left is in love with this one

Nutsuckers run the government so their death/rape cult has been given free reign

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Genocide then - 1/31/2017 11:13:48 AM   
stef


Posts: 10215
Joined: 1/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I want to destroy the ideology Islam. Muslims can un-Muslims themselves. Just like Nazis can un-Nazi themselves.

Can you un-stupid yourself?

_____________________________

Welcome to PoliticSpace! If you came here expecting meaningful BDSM discussions, boy are you in the wrong place.

"Hypocrisy has consequences"

(in reply to Greta75)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Genocide then - 1/31/2017 11:24:38 AM   
tamaka


Posts: 5079
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

I think there really needs to be some kind of court case that determines what aspects of Islam is a religion, and therefore protected, and what aspects are not considered part of the religion, and therefore not protected.



Would Jim Jones' commune be protected? Bill Clinton had the Branch Davidians burned alive - men, women and children. There are limits to what death / rape cults can get away with, but for whatever reason, the alt left is in love with this one


Bounded ethicality?

bounded ethicality,” which can be identified with the putative fact that well-intentioned people, constrained by psychological limitations, make ethical choices inconsistent with their own ethical beliefs and commitment

(in reply to BoscoX)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Genocide then - 1/31/2017 4:44:50 PM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
No, more like when the ATF comes to investigate you for illegal weapons and explosives, you dont shoot at them.

Bounded ethicality more probably relates to nutsuckers murdering men women and children in Iraq, after fucking with the middle east since the time of Eisenhower, and propping up dictators who raped and maimed the populations, arming them as freedom fighters and promising to back them and then dumping them in the shitter and then wonder why they are being attacked by these people.

Don't worry we all done it.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to tamaka)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Genocide then - 1/31/2017 4:55:53 PM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I want to destroy the ideology Islam. Muslims can un-Muslims themselves. Just like Nazis can un-Nazi themselves.

Can you un-stupid yourself?

Well, at least the bigots aren't dancing around pretending they're misunderstood. They're bigots, and they're at war with an entire people/religion for nothing but their faith.

In Singapore, whatever. In America, that's gonna pose a problem.

(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Genocide then - 1/31/2017 6:11:39 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961


quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka

It's not that they are all terrorists but they are all carriers of an ideology that is counter to western values and is condusive to terrorism.



I hate to tell you this, but ANY ideology can be screwed around to be conducive to terrorism, or have you forgotten anti abortion Christians who have twisted the bible around to condone bombing of abortion clinics, murdering of abortion doctors and abortion clinic workers, killing of homosexuals, killing of African Americans....

Or in Ireland, Catholics killing protestants and vice versa....

In the Balkans, the bible was twisted around to support this thing called 'ethnic cleansing.'

In other words, what you are saying is that it is not the 1.8% of the total Muslim population on the planet that is following some perverted form of the religion that has been twisted by would be holy men to condone doing every thing the prophet told them NOT to do.

FYI, the infidels that Mohammad was referring to, the thing that has been twisted by those leaders, were not then, nor ever meant to be Christians and Jews, they were referring to the same people that Jesus said should be killed if they cannot be converted, the believers of false gods, you know, idol worshipers, like the people in polytheistic religions.

But hey, whatever floats your boat toots. It sounds good to quote the same fucked up bullshit that these so called Imams are quoting to justify killing innocent people, to justify bombing the shit out of innocent people, which then creates a breeding ground for more young men and women to be converted into blowing themselves up killing innocent people....

Catching a cycle here?

The United States may not be a "christian' government, in fact we have gone to great lengths to keep church and state separate, except that every oath of office taken, unless the one taking it opts to use the alternative wording, ends with "So Help Me God."

Our money has "In god we trust."

And, since we basically believe in the same god as Muslims and Jews, when we send our planes and cruise missiles to hit targets that mean taking out some innocent civilians, we kind of promote the 'godless infidel' thing. You know, the people that pay lip service to believing in a god, like the Christians that hit church on Sunday morning or just the holidays, and spend the rest of the week breaking every damn commandment they can get away with?

Or lets put it another way.

You are playing with your kids in a park when suddenly the world erupts in a ball of flame and big explosions, and when the smoke clears, everyone you care about are either dead and or wounded.

Now the country that just did that with their cruise missiles has "In god we trust" or "under god" plastered all over their currency, founding documents, etc.

And they did this to get some bastard that might have been hiding in your neighborhood.

Who the fuck are you going to blame for those dead and maimed friends and family, the bastard they tried to kill with a one ton warhead, or the people that condoned using the damn missile in the first place?

For the last 40 some odd years, every time the US has retaliated for some terrorist attack, we have done so with bombs, missiles and whatever ordinance that would keep the bulk of our military out of harms way.

When the F111's hit Libya in 1986 because of Qaddafi's firing on an American ship, we hit the buildings we were targeting, and in the process killed about a thousand Libyans who had no more to do with what their military did as they had to do with you scratching your ass because of a mosquito bite.

Yeah, they knew the dictator running the country was ultimately to blame, but they also grasped that the US could have handled the situation other than sending 4 squadrons of bombers to hit solitary buildings.

And to top it off, we didnt kill the son of a bitch we were trying to.

Ever heard the term using a shot gun to kill a fly?

The US and other western nations has done more to aid the creation and recruitment of terrorists than we have done to stop it.

"Your loved ones were killed by the great Satan in the US, who does not care about you or the family members they killed with their bombs and rockets. They tried to kill one man and in not killing them, killed innocent women and children."

"they are not at war with <insert leader name> they are at war with you, they want you exterminated."

Not hard to convince someone of that who may be 13 and just buried his entire family killed in an American air strike, do you agree?


You will kill the fly, but there is a damn good chance you are going to fuck up a lot of shit in the process.

Think about that.

Not that Fox news or any other news outlet in the US is going to stop and say, "you know, if we would have handled things differently..."

Not a single one of you people are willing to admit that the US has killed more Muslims in retaliatory strikes since the Reagan years than all the terrorist attacks against American citizens. I mean hell, we are probably leading them 5 or 600 to one in body count.

I dont know about you, but it sure as hell might piss me off.

I think you're laying the blame on a religion instead of acknowledging that it's a religion in a 7th century tribal world. I can do tribal, I can do the religion, I can do the 7th century but the combination isn't peaceful. If you look at the problem as a whole, there are certainly more responses than napalm or not napalm.

(in reply to jlf1961)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Genocide then - 1/31/2017 6:13:45 PM   
Nnanji


Posts: 4552
Joined: 3/29/2016
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery


quote:

ORIGINAL: stef


quote:

ORIGINAL: Greta75

I want to destroy the ideology Islam. Muslims can un-Muslims themselves. Just like Nazis can un-Nazi themselves.

Can you un-stupid yourself?

Well, at least the bigots aren't dancing around pretending they're misunderstood. They're bigots, and they're at war with an entire people/religion for nothing but their faith.

In Singapore, whatever. In America, that's gonna pose a problem.

Wait, as the biggest bigot on these boards, assuming Stef is just all around mean and evil and bigotry is just part of her persona, are you providing insight into your little mind?

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Genocide then Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.188