LuckyAlbatross
Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Satyr6406 I get the idea that you're trying to push me into a corner, here. If someone only wishes BDSM play, that's fine (as I've said, before) but, to then, label themselves as a submissive is not accurate (and in my humble opinion: dishonest). Many (maybe even millions of) people enjoy BDSM and that's it. Many only wish to "submit" in the bedroom. God bless 'em. By taking the "name" of "submissive" (or slave), they are sending the wrong message, as far as I am concerned. My point is more that you can't define someone's "lifestyle orientation" based on a small set of actions, or a particular short term type of relationship that they are in. A person may be actively in the scene for a decade and never be owned. A person may come onto collarme today and move in next week with their new master. Which one is "living the lifestyle"? It's a far more complex process than "if you're a bottom, you're X and if you're a sub, you're Y."
_____________________________
Find stable partners, not a stable of partners. "Sometimes my whore logic gets all fuzzy"- Californication
|