bounty44
Posts: 6374
Joined: 11/1/2014 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: eulero83 quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44 neither one of those descriptions depict misogyny, or even sexism for that matter and I daresay 3/4 of the population (or whatever percentage is not liberal) would agree with me. whats more, oreilly, in my experience, is an equal opportunity "offender." he criticizes where criticism is due, irrespective of person, gender, worldview, etc. sorry, he doesn't hate women. well I guess this is your game https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/129/Moving_the_Goalposts, no he is not an equal opportunity offender he is a sex offender, and according to his daughter an absent and violent father feel free to enlighten me on exactly which goalposts I moved. your evidence of oreilly being a "misogynist" were a couple of statements he made that were seemingly critical of women. if he "hates" women by your standard, then he "hates everyone" and is therefore a misanthrope. what else I have done, I hope plainly, is reject your "evidence" as misogyny. in short, you don't know what the word really means. end of goal posts. sorry---if bill oreilly is a sex offender, he would be registered as such and that can be looked up publicly. I have one that lives across the road from me. if you want stick by that claim, please do so. he lives in Levittown ny. good hunting. he might indeed have been an absent and violent father, that doesn't make him a misogynist either---and you want to accuse me of moving goalposts??
< Message edited by bounty44 -- 4/6/2017 1:05:31 PM >
|