quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

What brought this on?

Is not a lie, liar, egregious stereotype, a sock, misinformation, fake news – not an attack?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

The current sticky posts make clear these are not acceptable:

- attacking more than not
- mentioning a poster not in a thread
- using a poster's ethnic/religious/gender-preference in an attack
- harassment by continually attacking a poster

Now, these (and other guidelines, like not changing thread titles or a poster's name), are continually ignored.

Have the forum guidelines changed?

Is it time for someone to update the sticky notes at the top of this forum?

Have we moved to the honor system?

Is there sufficient honor here?

Is a continual insult-fest what posters here desire?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

and getting politically draconian!

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

politics and religion too rough for ya?

So you want more euphemistic politically correct approach or outright censorship?

Politics is most often religion gone public after all, how do you plan to reasonably implement that since damn near all qualitative judgments border on or is entirely based in religion regardless of the label one wants to define themselves under. What about stalking people with the same dumb assed strawman question used as an adhomimen attack? Does that count?

As long we are not talking about libel whats the problem?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

politics and religion too rough for ya?

So you want more euphemistic politically correct approach or outright censorship?

Politics is most often religion gone public after all, how do you plan to reasonably implement that since damn near all qualitative judgments border on or is entirely based in religion regardless of the label one wants to define themselves under. What about stalking people with the same dumb assed strawman question used as an adhomimen attack? Does that count?

As long we are not talking about libel whats the problem?

I'm not the one who set those guidelines.

Are they the guidelines? If not, what are the guidelines?

Are there guidelines?

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

politics and religion too rough for ya?

So you want more euphemistic politically correct approach or outright censorship?

Politics is most often religion gone public after all, how do you plan to reasonably implement that since damn near all qualitative judgments border on or is entirely based in religion regardless of the label one wants to define themselves under. What about stalking people with the same dumb assed strawman question used as an adhomimen attack? Does that count?

As long we are not talking about libel whats the problem?

I'm not the one who set those guidelines.

Are they the guidelines? If not, what are the guidelines?

Are there guidelines?

The guidelines just establish what rightards can whine to the mods about, and threads that will be yanked for nasty nonrightardthink talking.
Holocaust denial is acceptable. Hilary bashing is approved. Namecalling the Trumptooners is grounds to pull a thread.
But any ideological bias here (as it is anyplace else on the internet) is purely left leaning...

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

and why would the board want to involve itself with determining what is and is not and what level of whatever you are imagining is 'grown up'?

quote:

ORIGINAL: WickedsDesire

rea0ne posts (save his last one) make 100% sense to me on this one and he knew what I meant.

I will repeat Is not a lie, liar, egregious stereotype, a sock, misinformation, fake news – not an attack? that will win you a presidency in one particular country

Want to know what happens when you have corrupt hypocritical moderation and forums owners who are (lie, liar, egregious stereotype, a sock, misinformation, fake news etc) Fuk over to fetlife and have a look - really go look- I will hold your hand if you feel the need.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

and why would the board want to involve itself with determining what is and is not and what level of whatever you are imagining is 'grown up'?

Why did the board ever set guidelines then?