RE: LGBTK?

RE: LGBTK? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

LadyPact -> RE: LGBTK? (5/7/2017 3:55:41 AM)
It's not a bad question, though... Posting habits, I mean. I don't post a lot when Engie's here unless our sleep patterns don't match or he's in the shower, or some fool thing. Come to think of it, never posted much when (the former tk) was with me, either. Hmmmm. Wonder what that means? Is it possible that <gasp> yes, I really do consider some s-types more important than others? The world may never know. [;)]

tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/7/2017 10:43:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact It's not a bad question, though... Posting habits, I mean. I don't post a lot when Engie's here unless our sleep patterns don't match or he's in the shower, or some fool thing. Come to think of it, never posted much when (the former tk) was with me, either. Hmmmm. Wonder what that means? Is it possible that <gasp> yes, I really do consider some s-types more important than others? The world may never know. [;)] Nice to see you have some small amount of value for humanity.

WhoreMods -> RE: LGBTK? (5/7/2017 10:47:43 AM)
I was a bit let down by this thread after that title: I was hoping for an LGB version of "The Tomorrow People" or something...

LadyPact -> RE: LGBTK? (5/7/2017 12:04:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact It's not a bad question, though... Posting habits, I mean. I don't post a lot when Engie's here unless our sleep patterns don't match or he's in the shower, or some fool thing. Come to think of it, never posted much when (the former tk) was with me, either. Hmmmm. Wonder what that means? Is it possible that <gasp> yes, I really do consider some s-types more important than others? The world may never know. [;)] Nice to see you have some small amount of value for humanity. Hey, how's that humanity thing going for you?? Still cleaning your ex-husbands home? Doing his laundry? Etc, etc? Still suck his cock? People would lose their shit if a D-type demanded the s-type to continue serving AFTER a dynamic is over. If an s-type got their consent violated, everybody would be screaming RUN!!! If an s-type put somebody out of their life, everybody would cheer them on! Oh, not the same, huh? 'Cause all that ever needs to happen is for somebody to say they are an s-type, and everybody has to put up with their shit. Allow me to be perfectly clear. Whatever you think of me, that thing you've got going on in your head about how people deserve to be stalked, outed, their consent violated... It's not a popularity contest.

tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/7/2017 12:28:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact It's not a bad question, though... Posting habits, I mean. I don't post a lot when Engie's here unless our sleep patterns don't match or he's in the shower, or some fool thing. Come to think of it, never posted much when (the former tk) was with me, either. Hmmmm. Wonder what that means? Is it possible that <gasp> yes, I really do consider some s-types more important than others? The world may never know. [;)] Nice to see you have some small amount of value for humanity. Hey, how's that humanity thing going for you?? Still cleaning your ex-husbands home? Doing his laundry? Etc, etc? Still suck his cock? People would lose their shit if a D-type demanded the s-type to continue serving AFTER a dynamic is over. If an s-type got their consent violated, everybody would be screaming RUN!!! If an s-type put somebody out of their life, everybody would cheer them on! Oh, not the same, huh? 'Cause all that ever needs to happen is for somebody to say they are an s-type, and everybody has to put up with their shit. Allow me to be perfectly clear. Whatever you think of me, that thing you've got going on in your head about how people deserve to be stalked, outed, their consent violated... It's not a popularity contest. Not caring whether someone lives or dies is quite different than going back to clean their house. You're just a looney in leather.

Lucylastic -> RE: LGBTK? (5/7/2017 12:44:20 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: LP said she has no care whether the person she 'plays with' lives or dies. I have nothing in common with someone like that. Nope. That's what she said. Sorry if you can't read what i wrote or that you're adding your own assumptions into it. I didn't say that they lived or died due to her play. I'm not a liar. You're a moron. That's not what LP said at all. What LP said was quote: I can promise you that I've had former s-types that, whether they lived or died, it wouldn't matter to me. Much in the same way that I've had one night stands that have no significance on my life. They were something I did. Nothing more. post 52. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=5029597 Let me help you because you are dense. What does 'Having Former s-types' mean? Well it means you play with them. Especially in LP's world because she admits over and over again that she is only into kink for play. So she has had former s-types, meaning she has played with some s-types previously (former), whom she doesn't care whether they lived or died. How lovely a thought is that. Now stop being LP's loyal little bitch and let her, being the dominant woman that she is, handle her own problems. When someone stalks you, attacks you, causes problems with your family, job and life, why should you care for them still, why do you think they should give a damn about what is happening with them? Who are you to decide what feelings are correct after any type of relationship is over. Or should "one" probe into how you feel about anyone you have had a relationship with, after parting badly? No regrets? no bad relationships? have no friends ever turn on you? Never had a play partner for the evening? Ive been doing this 20 years and I certainly have people that I dont care to know anything further about them. Abusers, rapists, molesters, not just men, but women too, on the s and the D side That doesnt mean that you wish death on anyone. But there is a huge difference between not caring if they live or die after the fact, and not caring about their physical and mental health when you "trusted" them and played with them. PS im not anyones bitch, Im own that for myself. now troll on. Ive had my fun, you can continue all you like. Im not playing with your pathetic bullshit today

tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/7/2017 12:49:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: LP said she has no care whether the person she 'plays with' lives or dies. I have nothing in common with someone like that. Nope. That's what she said. Sorry if you can't read what i wrote or that you're adding your own assumptions into it. I didn't say that they lived or died due to her play. I'm not a liar. You're a moron. That's not what LP said at all. What LP said was quote: I can promise you that I've had former s-types that, whether they lived or died, it wouldn't matter to me. Much in the same way that I've had one night stands that have no significance on my life. They were something I did. Nothing more. post 52. http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=5029597 Let me help you because you are dense. What does 'Having Former s-types' mean? Well it means you play with them. Especially in LP's world because she admits over and over again that she is only into kink for play. So she has had former s-types, meaning she has played with some s-types previously (former), whom she doesn't care whether they lived or died. How lovely a thought is that. Now stop being LP's loyal little bitch and let her, being the dominant woman that she is, handle her own problems. When someone stalks you, attacks you, causes problems with your family, job and life, why should you care for them still, why do you think they should give a damn about what is happening with them? Who are you to decide what feelings are correct after any type of relationship is over. Or should "one" probe into how you feel about anyone you have had a relationship with, after parting badly? No regrets? no bad relationships? have no friends ever turn on you? Never had a play partner for the evening? Ive been doing this 20 years and I certainly have people that I dont care to know anything further about them. Abusers, rapists, molesters, not just men, but women too, on the s and the D side That doesnt mean that you wish death on anyone. But there is a huge difference between not caring if they live or die after the fact, and not caring about their physical and mental health when you "trusted" them and played with them. PS im not anyones bitch, Im own that for myself. now troll on. Ive had my fun, you can continue all you like. Im not playing with your pathetic bullshit today You are the troll on this thread. And you are definitely LP's little bitch.

susie -> RE: LGBTK? (5/7/2017 10:56:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: LP said she has no care whether the person she 'plays with' lives or dies. I have nothing in common with someone like that. tamaka You have managed to twist a post by LadyPact to make it sound that she does not care if the person she is playing with lives or dies. That is completley distorting the meaning of her post. I do not know you or LadyPact or Lucylastic but from reading this thread you come across as someone with a huge chip on your shoulder and a desperate need to prove yourself.

LadyPact -> RE: LGBTK? (5/8/2017 1:05:06 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka You are the troll on this thread. And you are definitely LP's little bitch. Dude, I absolutely consider Lucy a friend, but the idea that she's my bitch is fucking laughable. Yes, she and a certain number of other folks know more about the stalking thing than you'll probably ever see on the forums. Your thoughts about whether you like someone or not, is not the deciding factor of they deserve to be stalking victim. If it's only wrong based on how you think about the receiver, yeah, I'm going to go with you are waaaayyyy more fucked up than you think I am. Personally, I happen to think that "you're not a Dom/you're not a submissive" crud is nothing more than manipulative bullshit. It's the line people use when somebody isn't doing something that another person wants. It's pretty close to bottom of the barrel kind of crap. Here's the deal. A part of being a Dominant is about not caring if other people think you're a Dominant. But, we can even skip that. I'm absolutely am a top. I'm a responsible one. Not perfect. During play, I do my best to be a risk awaaaaaare person. I'm not going to say that kink, sex, or play mean a lifetime commitment. If you're ever in a toxic relationship; Get out.

Page: << < prev 4 5 6 7 [8]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875