RE: LGBTK?

RE: LGBTK? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

Nnanji -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 5:02:53 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I dont need to have anything, she made the claim, you made the claim, back it up, you are both indiscriminate liars and haters, I only hate the willfully ignorant. And thats why you arent citing my posts that show quote: You don't know anything about what it takes to be a dominant either besides toys. You are a fool. It's very obvious. You only hate.

tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 5:05:37 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I dont need to have anything, she made the claim, you made the claim, back it up, you are both indiscriminate liars and haters, I only hate the willfully ignorant. And thats why you arent citing my posts that show quote: You don't know anything about what it takes to be a dominant either besides toys. You are a fool. It's very obvious. Lucy, God Himself could show you yourself in a mirror and you wouldn't believe Him. The thing you are most ignorant of is yourself.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 5:08:56 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka Well if that's true it is a very shallow community then. Disgusting. No more or less shallow than most other 'communities'. It seems you are reading more into it than most do. There's nothing wrong with that; that's how you are. But it's disingenuous to project that ideal onto everyone else and then find out it's not all what you thought it was. Some would say that to take this activity so seriously, is a weakness on your part. I don't give a shit and I have no axe to grind but everyone is different and unique.

Lucylastic -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 5:10:36 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I dont need to have anything, she made the claim, you made the claim, back it up, you are both indiscriminate liars and haters, I only hate the willfully ignorant. And thats why you arent citing my posts that show quote: You don't know anything about what it takes to be a dominant either besides toys. You are a fool. It's very obvious. Lucy, God Himself could show you yourself in a mirror and you wouldn't believe Him. The thing you are most ignorant of is yourself. unlike god, you have nothing.

tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 5:11:43 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka Well if that's true it is a very shallow community then. Disgusting. No more or less shallow than most other 'communities'. It seems you are reading more into it than most do. There's nothing wrong with that; that's how you are. But it's disingenuous to project that ideal onto everyone else and then find out it's not all what you thought it was. Some would say that to take this activity so seriously, is a weakness on your part. I don't give a shit and I have no axe to grind but everyone is different and unique. Well not really because it is the M/s relationship itself that is important to me. The 'kink' part are just some tools that enhance the relationship.

tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 5:13:49 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic I dont need to have anything, she made the claim, you made the claim, back it up, you are both indiscriminate liars and haters, I only hate the willfully ignorant. And thats why you arent citing my posts that show quote: You don't know anything about what it takes to be a dominant either besides toys. You are a fool. It's very obvious. Lucy, God Himself could show you yourself in a mirror and you wouldn't believe Him. The thing you are most ignorant of is yourself. unlike god, you have nothing. Keep telling yourself that, because you don't have the strength of character that allows for self-reflection.

Lucylastic -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 5:28:44 PM)
but but you have proof, my posts....there must be hundreds of them to prove im not a dominant, cmon show me them. And you have no idea about my strength of character... none what so ever, so again, you peddle bullshit continually, not just about me, but by other dominant women on this forum. (let alone male submissives) WIthout proof, without cause and without truth

tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 5:30:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic but but you have proof, my posts....there must be hundreds of them to prove im not a dominant, cmon show me them. And you have no idea about my strength of character... none what so ever, so again, you peddle bullshit continually, not just about me, but by other dominant women on this forum. (let alone male submissives) WIthout proof, without cause and without truth Lucy... you are not a dominant woman. You are a quack. And a disgrace to womanhood.

WinsomeDefiance -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 5:36:01 PM)
Tamaka, I'm going to ask a few personal questions. If you aren't comfortable answering, or simply don't want to, no hard feelings. Are you currently in a Master slave relationship? If yes, how long? If no, have you been collared, in the past as a slave? In real life, not online. If yes, how long? If more than once, how many times and how long each time? I ask, because you are very self aware of who you are and what you are want/need. Naturally I'm curious to learn a bit about your growth and how you came to identify as a slave. Again, if you choose not to answer, no worries, no offense.

tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 5:44:51 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance Tamaka, I'm going to ask a few personal questions. If you aren't comfortable answering, or simply don't want to, no hard feelings. Are you currently in a Master slave relationship? If yes, how long? If no, have you been collared, in the past as a slave? In real life, not online. If yes, how long? If more than once, how many times and how long each time? I ask, because you are very self aware of who you are and what you are want/need. Naturally I'm curious to learn a bit about your growth and how you came to identify as a slave. Again, if you choose not to answer, no worries, no offense. Yes i am currently in a relationship. It has been one year. I started in a Gorean M/s relationship for 2 years That was 10 years ago after i ended my 20 year vanilla marriage. I was owned. by a BDSM severe sadist (probably the one true love of my life) for a year. That was also 24/7 and my first poly experience. I was with a daddy dom type Master for 4 years. I took a couple of years off to focus on myself. Now i am in my current M/s relationship but we are not 24/7 at this time. It is also a poly relationship and He is awesome, but i am being more cautious this time because i don't have the resilience that i used to have. It has been quite a growth process in every way. I would definitely say it is the Gorean community that really helped me understand myself, both the Men and the girls in that community. Unfortunately that group of people have disbanded over the years. I also am involved in yoga so the spiritual aspects are very important to me as well.

Lucylastic -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 5:52:28 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic but but you have proof, my posts....there must be hundreds of them to prove im not a dominant, cmon show me them. And you have no idea about my strength of character... none what so ever, so again, you peddle bullshit continually, not just about me, but by other dominant women on this forum. (let alone male submissives) WIthout proof, without cause and without truth Lucy... you are not a dominant woman. You are a quack. And a disgrace to womanhood. again, but you have zero proof, no back up, no nothing, im sorry, but you have nothing, will never have anything but willful ignorance. you are so sad and lacking in credibility about me, female dominants or my posts. as your past 8 posts to me have proven.

tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 5:56:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic but but you have proof, my posts....there must be hundreds of them to prove im not a dominant, cmon show me them. And you have no idea about my strength of character... none what so ever, so again, you peddle bullshit continually, not just about me, but by other dominant women on this forum. (let alone male submissives) WIthout proof, without cause and without truth Lucy... you are not a dominant woman. You are a quack. And a disgrace to womanhood. again, but you have zero proof, no back up, no nothing, im sorry, but you have nothing, will never have anything but willful ignorance. you are so sad and lacking in credibility about me, female dominants or my posts. as your past 8 posts to me have proven. Like i said before, which you don't seem to grasp, the way you represent yourself here day in and day out confirms what i am saying. I understand your ignorance makes you uncapable of seeing it. There's nothing i can do to help you with that.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 5:58:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka Well if that's true it is a very shallow community then. Disgusting. No more or less shallow than most other 'communities'. It seems you are reading more into it than most do. There's nothing wrong with that; that's how you are. But it's disingenuous to project that ideal onto everyone else and then find out it's not all what you thought it was. Some would say that to take this activity so seriously, is a weakness on your part. I don't give a shit and I have no axe to grind but everyone is different and unique. Well not really because it is the M/s relationship itself that is important to me. The 'kink' part are just some tools that enhance the relationship. And that is exactly what LP has said. You are emotionally involved so the dynamic is important to you - just like LP said. Anything else is icing on the cake and could be ignored because it has no catastrophic influence on your relationship. And regardless of the dynamic, everyone has a choice.

LadyPact -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:03:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka You are not a dominant at all LP. You couldn't be dominant if your very life depended on it. Wearing a leather skirt and sticking a candle up someone's ass does not make you a dominant. You have no sense of responsibility. You are a disgrace to the community. This means as much to me as random nonsense from people that scream how some people are not submissive because they won't acquiescence to other people's demands. Just like some people cast off that baloney about how somebody is not an s-type because they won't bow to other people's opinions. Please feel free to cast your aspirations of dominance because somebody doesn't bend to YOUR will and YOUR ideas. I will tell you the same as I did the last person who, because I refused to do what they wanted... Don't think I'm a Dominant? Cool. I'm a top. This releases me from YOUR expectations and I still get to engage in BDSM and have a damned good time. It is, and has always been my opinion, that the limitus test of engaging in any of this stuff, it's a popularity contest or an opinion poll. Couldn't care less about the obligations you think I have to fulfill. Of course, if wrapping people up to YOUR demands is what works for you, I won't say anything against it. BDSM is NOT about emotional attachment if even ONE of the participants does not consent.

tamaka -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:04:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: freedomdwarf1 quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka Well if that's true it is a very shallow community then. Disgusting. No more or less shallow than most other 'communities'. It seems you are reading more into it than most do. There's nothing wrong with that; that's how you are. But it's disingenuous to project that ideal onto everyone else and then find out it's not all what you thought it was. Some would say that to take this activity so seriously, is a weakness on your part. I don't give a shit and I have no axe to grind but everyone is different and unique. Well not really because it is the M/s relationship itself that is important to me. The 'kink' part are just some tools that enhance the relationship. And that is exactly what LP has said. You are emotionally involved so the dynamic is important to you - just like LP said. Anything else is icing on the cake and could be ignored because it has no catastrophic influence on your relationship. And regardless of the dynamic, everyone has a choice. LP said she has no care whether the person she 'plays with' lives or dies. I have nothing in common with someone like that.

LadyPact -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:20:33 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka LP said she has no care whether the person she 'plays with' lives or dies. I have nothing in common with someone like that. That wasn't what I said, AT ALL. I'm an edge player in kink. I would be mortified if I were to ever be the responsible party to a physical deformity.

freedomdwarf1 -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:21:08 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka LP said she has no care whether the person she 'plays with' lives or dies. I have nothing in common with someone like that. That's not what she said. Read it carefully. She said: I can promise you that I've had former s-types that, whether they lived or died, it wouldn't matter to me. Note 'former', not the people she is playing with at the time. I also have had friends in the past that I have no care about these days. That's what LP said. You have mis-read what she said and construed the meaning of it.

Lucylastic -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:25:46 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka quote: ORIGINAL: Lucylastic but but you have proof, my posts....there must be hundreds of them to prove im not a dominant, cmon show me them. And you have no idea about my strength of character... none what so ever, so again, you peddle bullshit continually, not just about me, but by other dominant women on this forum. (let alone male submissives) WIthout proof, without cause and without truth Lucy... you are not a dominant woman. You are a quack. And a disgrace to womanhood. again, but you have zero proof, no back up, no nothing, im sorry, but you have nothing, will never have anything but willful ignorance. you are so sad and lacking in credibility about me, female dominants or my posts. as your past 8 posts to me have proven. Like i said before, which you don't seem to grasp, the way you represent yourself here day in and day out confirms what i am saying. I understand your ignorance makes you uncapable of seeing it. There's nothing i can do to help you with that. Ive been posting here for 10 years, Im not changing because you cannot handle my english idioms, syntax or expressions. This forum is just a pleasure for me, not business, not legal, not academic, not strict. You have not shown one speck of anything to prove your dumb ignorance. Again Its really pointless, but as you want to play silly games so bad. no matter your response, I will continue to seek some fact amongst your sad attempts. I cant accept your opinion as valid because of what you are. Willfully ignorant.

Lucylastic -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:28:35 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact quote: ORIGINAL: tamaka LP said she has no care whether the person she 'plays with' lives or dies. I have nothing in common with someone like that. That wasn't what I said, AT ALL. I'm an edge player in kink. I would be mortified if I were to ever be the responsible party to a physical deformity. The lie is so blatant.

LadyPact -> RE: LGBTK? (5/6/2017 6:34:18 PM)
She's just pissed because I met you in real life and I deleted her BS email unread.

Page: << < prev 3 4 [5] 6 7 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.0625