quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

The best statement in the article:

When I became active in the Republican Party in the mid-1970s, it was the party of thoughtful men and women who were transforming America’s domestic policies while strengthening its moral leadership on the global stage. As Democratic Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan wrote in a July 1980 New York Times article, “the GOP has become a party of ideas.”

Next best:

And then, everything began to change. Republicans took control of Congress in 1994 after nationalizing the election into broad themes and catchphrases. Newt Gingrich, the marshal of these efforts, even released a list of words Republican candidates should use to glorify themselves (common sense, prosperity, empower) and hammer their opponents (liberal, pathetic, traitors); soon, every Republican in Congress spoke the same language, using words carefully run through focus groups by Republican pollster Frank Luntz. The demonizing of your opponent began with the repubs (right) during this period.

Lol, 'ol Newt took a page right out of the democrats playbook.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

It's all Hilary had, which is why she lost.

But Hilary's gone. It's the rest of America he'll have to answer to now.

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

The best statement in the article:

When I became active in the Republican Party in the mid-1970s, it was the party of thoughtful men and women who were transforming America’s domestic policies while strengthening its moral leadership on the global stage. As Democratic Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan wrote in a July 1980 New York Times article, “the GOP has become a party of ideas.”

Next best:

And then, everything began to change. Republicans took control of Congress in 1994 after nationalizing the election into broad themes and catchphrases. Newt Gingrich, the marshal of these efforts, even released a list of words Republican candidates should use to glorify themselves (common sense, prosperity, empower) and hammer their opponents (liberal, pathetic, traitors); soon, every Republican in Congress spoke the same language, using words carefully run through focus groups by Republican pollster Frank Luntz. The demonizing of your opponent began with the repubs (right) during this period.

Lol, 'ol Newt took a page right out of the democrats playbook.

You mean for just one example when Tom Delaney had a 'mid-term' census taken in Tex, to gerrymander 5 additional cong. seats ?

And even if there was a scintilla of fact in your statement, the repubs were pretty fucking slow. It was 79 years to obtain consecutive repub majorities in the house when Gingrich and co. somehow managed that.

Plus, in all of my adult life, I have never heard or read the dems or independents demonize their opposition and call repubs and their supporters...traitors and much more.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

It's all Hilary had, which is why she lost.

But Hilary's gone. It's the rest of America he'll have to answer to now.

Still all any of you have are your hysterical "hate Trump" "Republicans are racist sexist bigots homophobes" and disingenuous "vote for us and everything will be free"

Until we become just like Venezuela... At which time your Dear Leader type will be firmly in control and we will be powerless to change things back to the economic model that worked for over 200 years - freedom, and free markets

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

It's all Hilary had, which is why she lost.

But Hilary's gone. It's the rest of America he'll have to answer to now.

Still all any of you have are your hysterical "hate Trump" "Republicans are racist sexist bigots homophobes" and disingenuous "vote for us and everything will be free"

Until we become just like Venezuela... At which time your Dear Leader type will be firmly in control and we will be powerless to change things back to the economic model that worked for over 200 years - freedom, and free markets

Do you think anybody would even have a problem with all of the gay bashing from the Republicans if a sizable minority of their elected officials weren't hanging toilet paper over the cubicle door whenever they go for a shit in an airport and can't find a cubicle with a glory hole drilled in the side?

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

It's all Hilary had, which is why she lost.

But Hilary's gone. It's the rest of America he'll have to answer to now.

Still all any of you have are your hysterical "hate Trump" "Republicans are racist sexist bigots homophobes" and disingenuous "vote for us and everything will be free"

Until we become just like Venezuela... At which time your Dear Leader type will be firmly in control and we will be powerless to change things back to the economic model that worked for over 200 years - freedom, and free markets

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nnanji

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

The best statement in the article:

When I became active in the Republican Party in the mid-1970s, it was the party of thoughtful men and women who were transforming America’s domestic policies while strengthening its moral leadership on the global stage. As Democratic Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan wrote in a July 1980 New York Times article, “the GOP has become a party of ideas.”

Next best:

And then, everything began to change. Republicans took control of Congress in 1994 after nationalizing the election into broad themes and catchphrases. Newt Gingrich, the marshal of these efforts, even released a list of words Republican candidates should use to glorify themselves (common sense, prosperity, empower) and hammer their opponents (liberal, pathetic, traitors); soon, every Republican in Congress spoke the same language, using words carefully run through focus groups by Republican pollster Frank Luntz. The demonizing of your opponent began with the repubs (right) during this period.

Lol, 'ol Newt took a page right out of the democrats playbook.

You mean for just one example when Tom Delaney had a 'mid-term' census taken in Tex, to gerrymander 5 additional cong. seats ?

And even if there was a scintilla of fact in your statement, the repubs were pretty fucking slow. It was 79 years to obtain consecutive repub majorities in the house when Gingrich and co. somehow managed that.

Plus, in all of my adult life, I have never heard or read the dems or independents demonize their opposition and call repubs and their supporters...traitors and much more.

You always get to the tin foil hats. Deplorable and it will kill millions if you keep it up.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

It's all Hilary had, which is why she lost.

But Hilary's gone. It's the rest of America he'll have to answer to now.

Still all any of you have are your hysterical "hate Trump" "Republicans are racist sexist bigots homophobes" and disingenuous "vote for us and everything will be free"

Until we become just like Venezuela... At which time your Dear Leader type will be firmly in control and we will be powerless to change things back to the economic model that worked for over 200 years - freedom, and free markets

If you don't want to be simply laughed at and dismissed, you'll need something more than absurdly ridiculous straw man positions.

And weren't you just whining that the right was now against free markets because Bezos?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

So owning whole foods is progressive liberal Marxist utopia.

Huh. That must be some incredible granola.

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

dont shit in his cornflakes, he was on a factless pants shitting felchgobble, an epic fail.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: mnottertail

dont shit in his cornflakes, he was on a factless pants shitting felchgobble, an epic fail.

Where would ManiacalMysery be without his slobblegobble sidekick

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Well, if there's legitimate concern, the justice department can block the merger.

But there are several multi-media mergers lead by very wealthy and powerful men--you don't seem to mind those.

What's the difference? Apparently . . . books and granola.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Well, if there's legitimate concern, the justice department can block the merger.

But there are several multi-media mergers lead by very wealthy and powerful men--you don't seem to mind those.

What's the difference? Apparently . . . books and granola.

This president has mentioned the Bezos monopolistic empire, and coincidentally the Washington Post keeps attacking him with unnamed anonymously sourced bs fake news stories

Odd how you alt left radicals love your 1% crony oligarch control now, too. With their pet politicians and vast propaganda empires