respectmen
Posts: 2042
Joined: 8/28/2015
Status: offline
|
Tweak
Oh crikey, where do I begin?
Feminists seem to be simplistic thinkers. They only see things in black and white while willfully ignoring the complexities. Take the wage gap theory for example.
One point that refutes a part of patriarchy theory alone is that every male does not think the same and every female does not think the same. Some women are anti feminists, others aren't. Some women are on the right, others are on the left. Men, vise versa. In today's world, lets look at two men, two people of the same gender. Donald Trump and Justin Trudeau. They share the same gender yet have totally opposite opinions.
So blaming certain mindsets, opinions on patriarchy is ludicrous. Such as the opinions on male disposability.
Patriarchy theory makes judgement depending what gender the person in a powerful position in society is, not the person's individuality and personal opinions. Having such a stance has more holes in it than a spaghetti strainer.
"Patriarchy" is meant to mean that men as a group hold power over women as a group. How can that be when women can be a president or PM or any one in a high status and powerful position in society? If it was REALLY a patriarchy, it would be against the law for women to be in such positions. If America was really a patriarchy, Hillary wouldn't have been allowed to run in the last election.
Oh but feminists claim that it's because evil patriarchy ghosts are keeping women down. That's feminists thinking black and white again. Could it be, I know, the different lifestyle choices females make compared to males due to them being the birth givers? I'm sure women having the womb and not men isn't the fault of patriarchy too. But nothing surprises me when it comes to feminism. But anyway, this is the reason why there are more males than females that are at the top of the game as they've had all that extra time to make it up there.
Only a small tiny subset of all men are in the elite positions, the other 99.9 percent of men are just as powerless as nearly all women. Is that a patriarchy? Far from it.
You didn't give me an irrefutable fact against my stance at all. All you rambled on about was that males hold most of the powerful positions.
Let's go back to what I said, I will quote myself.
quote:
If it's a fact, fucking prove it for fucks sake. For all these years where I have had run ins with feminists, when I ask them to show irrefutable evidence that patriarchy is to blame for whatever they are blaming it on, there hasn't been one single time, not one, where I have been shown the said evidence which turns the assumption into fact.
As I said that feminists never show irrefutable evidence that patriarchy is to blame for whatever they are blaming it on, in this case, the blame is on male disposability. So my question is, can you show irrefutable evidence that patriarchy is to blame for the mindset of male disposability?
Just answering with "males hold all the powerful positions" doesn't refute anything. It doesn't answer the question. So instead of making a deflection, can you actually come up with irrefutable evidence that this is the fault of patriarchy? How do you know if male disposability wouldn't exist under matriarchy? How do you know if male disposability wouldn't exist under neither patriarchy or matriarchy? What? You don't know? How than can you still blame patriarchy?
There has been female leaders in the past that started wars. They didn't seem to care about male disposability. Strange how they are supposed to be in a patriarchy and yet they were leaders lol.
Yes, your patriarchy theory bullshit is based on prejudice and bigotry, NOT FACT, dumbass. You have no irrefutable evidence and you never will as what you are saying is a fantasy.
|
Is Male Disposability the Fault of Patriarchy? - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread