Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BoscoX -> Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 7:12:03 AM)


From the same people working to take away our freedom to enjoy an after-sex cigarette:

Law professor warns: Congress must act on growing sexbot industry

As the sale and use of lifelike sex robots that allow people to simulate rape continues to gain steam, one famed law professor is sounding the alarm.

John Banzhaf, a well-known activist professor of public interest law at George Washington University Law School, says experts disagree on the consequences of allowing people to engage in mock acts of rape with humanoid dolls, and lawmakers should vet this issue as soon as possible.

Saying there’s evidence rape sexbots may significantly increase the chance of rape to real women, the law should “no longer stand by and blindly ignore a major potential problem by doing nothing,” he said in an email to The College Fix.

Sexbots, especially those which can be programmed to act as if they are being raped, and those which act and appear to be young children, are already here and in use, Banzhaf said.

“The obvious first step would be to have hearings and do studies to determine just how serious the threat is, whether there are any real benefits to having sexbots programmed to simulate being raped, and then what if any new laws, regulations, etc. might be appropriate,” he said.

Banzhaf is no stranger to successfully pushing for government regulation. He “helped drive cigarette commercials off the air” and was one of the masterminds behind lawsuits against the tobacco industry, his faculty bio states. More recently he used similar techniques to target the obesity epidemic. His legal activism course is also known as “Sue the Bastards,” according to one report.

Now he’s turned his critical legal eye to sexbots.

He said in a recent news release that the consequences of permitting the sale, distribution and use of sexbots to “perverts” and convicted or potential rapists should be reviewed.

More

~~~~~~~~

What if a woman fantasizes she is raping a man as she uses her dildo... ?

Some of this is really sick stuff, sure. But where do we draw the line, and how many video cameras do we put in everyone's bedroom to enforce whatever laws we come up with




mnottertail -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 7:15:49 AM)

Yup, fake news. A retards paradise, a real nutsucker slobberblog.




Musicmystery -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 7:56:42 AM)

A publication by student right-wingers.

You have way too much time on your hands.




Lucylastic -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 8:04:07 AM)

From someone who admits he likes to scare little girls and post pictures of bodiless women says its sick stuff.





WickedsDesire -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 8:05:00 AM)

I don’t know.
Many sex bot stories have been sporadically appearing in our news websites over the last year, or so. Some even marry them apparently – wasn’t that in an episode of Boston Legal…mind you that was a blow up doll – is there a difference?

That dildo line is actually a fairly common fantasy.

Other stories discuss the age, appearances, functuality of some of the bots. In the specific case you mentioned a counter argument can be made better the doll. But I am uncomfortable talking about stuff like that

But their purpose is not for rape, now is it, etc.




BoscoX -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 8:05:30 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

A publication by student right-wingers.

You have way too much time on your hands.


This from the same mindless drooler who worships at the alter of the his god Jeff Bezos and his personal propaganda rag, the Amazon Post... [:D]

Sex robots are real, idiot boy. Everything in the article is real

That you and reality parted ways a long time ago is only our problem because you keep posting your stupidity here




Musicmystery -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 8:06:40 AM)

Your paranoia is real. Your worship of right-wing students as journalism is all too real.

Your relevance, and that of your sources, is not.




BoscoX -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 8:11:03 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Your paranoia is real. Your worship of right-wing students as journalism is all too real.

Your relevance, and that of your sources, is not.


Go back to sucking the world's richest man's cock, the sane people here have fun and interesting things to discuss




mnottertail -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 8:13:13 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

A publication by student right-wingers.

You have way too much time on your hands.


This from the same mindless drooler who worships at the alter of the his god Jeff Bezos and his personal propaganda rag, the Amazon Post... [:D]

Sex robots are real, idiot boy. Everything in the article is real

That you and reality parted ways a long time ago is only our problem because you keep posting your stupidity here

Show us the sex robots of America, give us the panorama, pedophile. If it were so, many nutsuckers would be caught with little boy robots in motel rooms, and they wouldnt be facing charges.




ThatDizzyChick -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 8:13:50 AM)

The answer is: No.




bounty44 -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 8:17:45 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Your paranoia is real. Your worship of right-wing students as journalism is all too real.

Your relevance, and that of your sources, is not.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/17/opinion/sex-robots-consent.html

http://www.ibtimes.com/robot-sex-dolls-offer-settings-encourage-rape-simulation-2567889

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/now-theres-frigid-sex-robot-that-allows-men-simulate-rape-fantasies-1631203

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sexbot-brothels-sex-robots/

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/05/sex-robots-to-tackle-rape-pedophiles-dangerous-study.html

https://www.wessexscene.co.uk/features/2017/08/04/frigid-sex-robots-is-this-promoting-rape-or-preventing-it/

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/sex-robots-frigid-settings-rape-simulation-men-sexual-assault-a7847296.html

https://www.indy100.com/article/scientists-warning-sex-robots-rape-molestation-importing-a-toy-7829516

http://metro.co.uk/2017/07/19/sex-robot-allows-users-to-simulate-rape-through-setting-where-doll-will-say-no-6792042/

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/628127/Sex-robots-scientists-harrowing-warning-danger-cyborgs-love-dolls-rape

https://www.tweeddailynews.com.au/news/sex-robots-frigid-setting-encourages-simulated-rap/3203077/

http://www.businessinsider.com/our-future-with-sex-robots-noel-sharkey-report-2017-7

you seem to rate right up there with mnottertroll in terms of an inability to discern and think critically. quite frankly, you suck.

this is probably a great topic that should transcend your personal and partisan pettiness.





BoscoX -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 8:19:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Your paranoia is real. Your worship of right-wing students as journalism is all too real.

Your relevance, and that of your sources, is not.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/17/opinion/sex-robots-consent.html

http://www.ibtimes.com/robot-sex-dolls-offer-settings-encourage-rape-simulation-2567889

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/now-theres-frigid-sex-robot-that-allows-men-simulate-rape-fantasies-1631203

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sexbot-brothels-sex-robots/

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/05/sex-robots-to-tackle-rape-pedophiles-dangerous-study.html

https://www.wessexscene.co.uk/features/2017/08/04/frigid-sex-robots-is-this-promoting-rape-or-preventing-it/

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/sex-robots-frigid-settings-rape-simulation-men-sexual-assault-a7847296.html

https://www.indy100.com/article/scientists-warning-sex-robots-rape-molestation-importing-a-toy-7829516

http://metro.co.uk/2017/07/19/sex-robot-allows-users-to-simulate-rape-through-setting-where-doll-will-say-no-6792042/

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/628127/Sex-robots-scientists-harrowing-warning-danger-cyborgs-love-dolls-rape

https://www.tweeddailynews.com.au/news/sex-robots-frigid-setting-encourages-simulated-rap/3203077/

http://www.businessinsider.com/our-future-with-sex-robots-noel-sharkey-report-2017-7

quite frankly, you suck.




All leftists are howlers.

Mindless howlers.




bounty44 -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 8:23:11 AM)

its not quite the actual topic, but its close, I heartily recommend the movie ex machina.

there's also an interesting star trek tng episode where data discerns the nanobots someone's been working with are sentient, and he interferes with their being used against their will.




BoscoX -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 8:57:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

its not quite the actual topic, but its close, I heartily recommend the movie ex machina.

there's also an interesting star trek tng episode where data discerns the nanobots someone's been working with are sentient, and he interferes with their being used against their will.


This has been coming for a long time, so to speak. It's similar to how Al Gore's wife wanted to regulate the music industry

I can see both sides of this "rape" issue, but for the life of me I cannot fathom regulating it. People can buy parts and build them in their homes, whatever bot they want





Musicmystery -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 9:13:20 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

Your paranoia is real. Your worship of right-wing students as journalism is all too real.

Your relevance, and that of your sources, is not.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/07/17/opinion/sex-robots-consent.html

http://www.ibtimes.com/robot-sex-dolls-offer-settings-encourage-rape-simulation-2567889

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/now-theres-frigid-sex-robot-that-allows-men-simulate-rape-fantasies-1631203

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/sexbot-brothels-sex-robots/

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/05/sex-robots-to-tackle-rape-pedophiles-dangerous-study.html

https://www.wessexscene.co.uk/features/2017/08/04/frigid-sex-robots-is-this-promoting-rape-or-preventing-it/

http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/sex-robots-frigid-settings-rape-simulation-men-sexual-assault-a7847296.html

https://www.indy100.com/article/scientists-warning-sex-robots-rape-molestation-importing-a-toy-7829516

http://metro.co.uk/2017/07/19/sex-robot-allows-users-to-simulate-rape-through-setting-where-doll-will-say-no-6792042/

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/628127/Sex-robots-scientists-harrowing-warning-danger-cyborgs-love-dolls-rape

https://www.tweeddailynews.com.au/news/sex-robots-frigid-setting-encourages-simulated-rap/3203077/

http://www.businessinsider.com/our-future-with-sex-robots-noel-sharkey-report-2017-7

you seem to rate right up there with mnottertroll in terms of an inability to discern and think critically. quite frankly, you suck.

this is probably a great topic that should transcend your personal and partisan pettiness.



Yeah. I have political/partisan position on raping sex dolls. You are a moron.

He gave one silly source. You could have said, "It's actually on major news too -- here are some links."

Nope. Your knee jerk "You suck" impulse jumped in, keyboard smoking.

Get a life.




MrRodgers -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 9:22:07 AM)

So what are we worried about ? Are we to be worried about these bot rapers raping real women ? Is there any evidence of that whatsoever ? I see none here.

If so, are we then to be worried about taking their fantasy to the street and even though such a raper would have release at home ?

I am serious here because if we do need to act on this, then how about worse fantasies with gun owners who feel a need to then take it to the streets ?

If the gun owner is not to be feared for the likelihood [he] will take it to the streets, then we have no worries about the bot raper taking it to the streets and particularly in view of the fact, it's a private matter, in his own surroundings and he's on a machine.




BoscoX -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 9:27:12 AM)


You only give one far left propaganda article for most of what you post, howler.




BoscoX -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 9:28:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MrRodgers

So what are we worried about ? Are we to be worried about these bot rapers raping real women ? Is there any evidence of that whatsoever ? I see none here.

If so, are we then to be worried about taking their fantasy to the street and even though such a raper would have release at home ?

I am serious here because if we do need to act on this, then how about worse fantasies with gun owners who feel a need to then take it to the streets ?

If the gun owner is not to be feared for the likelihood [he] will take it to the streets, then we have no worries about the bot raper taking it to the streets and particularly in view of the fact, it's a private matter, in his own surroundings and he's on a machine.


Great on-topic, non-howler post.

Thank you.




Lucylastic -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 9:30:23 AM)

its all based on one report...
hardly earth shattering proof of anything.




WinsomeDefiance -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 9:30:41 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

its not quite the actual topic, but its close, I heartily recommend the movie ex machina.

there's also an interesting star trek tng episode where data discerns the nanobots someone's been working with are sentient, and he interferes with their being used against their will.

There was also the Federation scientist that demanded Data be handed over to be taken apart for study. Picard demanded a trial on his behalf to prove Data was a sentient being, not just a machine. Also the sensient hologram doctor on ST Voyager.

Until a robot is sentient, and so long as it remains property used in the privacy of someone's home, it shouldn't be any business of the government. With the exception of being used in court when a case is built on the prosecution of a crime against an individual in which the robots use indicates the defendants predilections.

Also, health code standards for robot uses in legal brothel type establishments, cuz ummm.....ewwww.






Page: [1] 2 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875