|
bounty44 -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/10/2017 5:18:24 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BoscoX
quote:
ORIGINAL: Greta75
I support the rape of an inanimate object like a sex bot they ordered or built and paid for to serve that function = legal.
A rape of a living and breathing human being = illegal.
Rape of a corpse = still on the fence about that, raping the dead is like, raping an inanimate object. Leaning towards, don't give a fuck. But of course its disrespectful. So everyone gonna get pissed off if this is a corpse they are related to. I guess that's trespassing. So technically illegal unless corpse is their spouse or significant other.
Let's keep it as that!
Their argument is that raping bots fuels a rapists desire for the real thing, and they claim evidence backs that up. (I don't know what evidence they mean though)
Then there's the pedo-bots part, which is just sick, and if that does lead to more abuse that way, it is extremely troubling. But what to do, is the question
since sex with minors and rape are both against the law, the distinction at this point might not be consequential.
the question of "what to do about it" hinges on the answer to the question that highlights (or plagues) the difference between right and left in almost all things---government regulation or not.
one thing that comes to my mind is, the relationship between making something illegal on paper and the extreme difficulty in actually doing so and enforcing it in real life. if we cannot do the latter, should we do the former.
ive not read any of the articles in terms of "evidence", that is, whether or not the robot rape or the underage robot (how old are they made up to be?) actually increase the likelihood of it occurring in "real life."
even if it doesn't however, one argument against sex like this with the robots is the general coarsening of humanity that might occur through it. and then back to the question of, whats the role of the government in that.
|
|
|
|
