|
BoscoX -> RE: Regulating Lifelike Sex Robot Rape? (8/8/2017 9:35:39 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: WinsomeDefiance
quote:
ORIGINAL: bounty44
its not quite the actual topic, but its close, I heartily recommend the movie ex machina.
there's also an interesting star trek tng episode where data discerns the nanobots someone's been working with are sentient, and he interferes with their being used against their will.
There was also the Federation scientist that demanded Data be handed over to be taken apart for study. Picard demanded a trial on his behalf to prove Data was a sentient being, not just a machine. Also the sensient hologram doctor on ST Voyager.
Until a robot is sentient, and so long as it remains property used in the privacy of someone's home, it shouldn't be any business of the government. With the exception of being used in court when a case is built on the prosecution of a crime against an individual in which the robots use indicates the defendants predilections.
Also, health code standards for robot uses in legal brothel type establishments, cuz ummm.....ewwww.
Good point
One's bot probably won't have a spousal privilege against providing incriminating testimony for some time to come
quote:
Also refer as spousal immunity, marital privilege or spousal testimonial privilege. Spousal Privilege: There are two separate privileges a criminal defendant may have, which can be used to avoid his or her spouse testifying against them at a criminal trial.
|
|
|
|
