RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


AtUrCervix -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/6/2017 4:00:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BeautifulNotion

Daca Dreamers: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme

An Obama-era scheme to protect young undocumented immigrants is being scrapped, US Attorney General Jeff Sessions has announced.

No first-time applications for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (Daca) programme will be acted on after Tuesday, the government confirmed.

However, existing recipients will not be affected for at least six months.

The scheme protected some 800,000 so-called "Dreamers", mostly Latin Americans, from deportation.

America’s President is sick in the head and thoroughly fucking disgusts me.

Is that all he does! Dismantle years of progress, this agreement, that agreement, other peoples work and hard graft and solutions, whilst coughing up not one signature piece of legislation. It’s if he has no soul and is not human.

500 000 "undocumented" home owners in Houston. I wonder what will happen to their abodes and worldly possessions. Did I also read right that only 15% of all residents had flood insurance?


Actually (for the record) the U.S. (and the Prez) did not dismantle DACA.

The Prez proposed a change in DACA...he allowed that it will have a 2 year "sunset"...with EVERY current recipient of same allowed an ADDITIONAL two year EXTENSION should they opt to file for same (which....they can do now....as in...today...which, according to the edict...would allow them FOUR years of extension (and their parents can file for them if they're under 18).

AND...he also said...."This is something that CONGRESS should address".

Ergo....EVERY person affected by DACA (and its rescission) has FOUR YEARS to resolve the issue while they wait for CONGRESS to do their job.

(You can love the Prez...or you can hate the Prez....it's your choice....facts....however....are {still} facts).

If...in 4 years....DACA is dead (FOUR years....certainly time for Congress to decide something favorable)....there is no Prez to blame....only Congress.




BamaD -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/6/2017 4:11:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BeautifulNotion

And have the spent $1 dollar on Houston yet?

They passed the relief package today.
On top of that your comment makes no sense.




bounty44 -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/6/2017 5:03:45 PM)

im wondering if its wickedsdesire ON medication.




BamaD -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/6/2017 5:24:28 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

im wondering if its wickedsdesire ON medication.

I hope not.




BamaD -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/6/2017 5:26:54 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

im wondering if its wickedsdesire ON medication.

I hope not.




DesideriScuri -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/6/2017 5:29:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

They are here illegally. Fuck the bullshit about "Christian precepts" unless you are willing to apply that same idea across the board. Be careful how you respond to that one. It doesn't matter how old they were when they got here. They are here illegally. It doesn't matter what our population growth rate is.

Of course, age matters. It is a well-established principle in our jurisprudence. Otherwise, why do we have juvenile detention centers for young offenders rather than sending them to the big boys’ jail? And especially we do not hold a child of six years to have agency under our jurisprudence. If a child at that age were to take a loaded gun from his parents dresser and mortally wound his brother, would you demand the death penalty for that child? Would you even demand a sentence in jail for that child? I doubt that you would. Saying that age does not matter is one of the silliest thing I have seen on these boards (then you need to read more bullshit on these boards).


Then who are we to blame? Do we not deport the kids along with the illegal family members? Are you going to support them being wards of the state and tearing families apart? Of course you're not. You're going to support the idea that "they're here, make 'em legal" which is counter to our immigration laws, isn't it? Send "Dreamers" back along with their illegal parents. Preserve the family!

quote:

quote:

We can't just ignore the laws we don't like, can we?

President Obama did not ignore the law. He took action despite it. Blind obedience to a law that you don’t like is cowardly behavior. We are not a nation of robots running on algorithms. That was well demonstrated by the slavery abolitionists, by the women’s protests for franchise, college students who rode buses into the South, and it will be demonstrated by the students who are affected in this latest sham.


We are a nation of laws for a reason. That reason will win out. If Congress changes the laws in this area, then that will change things, no? Congress has the power. They aren't using it. Why? Maybe we need new people in Congress.

quote:

quote:

Decency is applying laws objectively, not subjectively.

What a terrible idea! What need do we have of judges if they cannot mitigate the harshness of laws? Jurisprudence without mercy is a bloodless cold dead fish. It inevitably deprives us of fairness, of equal protection. A primary example are the bail bond laws which deprive the poor of freedom without a trial, but that the rich free.


It's also fair and just. You're opening every law in the Country up to subjective application. That isn't a nation of laws. That's a nation of discrimination, and not the USA.




DesideriScuri -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/6/2017 5:32:24 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BeautifulNotion
And have the spent $1 dollar on Houston yet?


http://www.theadvocate.com/nation_world/article_2df559da-8ce2-11e7-b046-df882d1f2964.html

Don't have Google?






bounty44 -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/6/2017 5:32:43 PM)

i say "ON medication" because there's been some semblance of sense in a few fleeting places.




BamaD -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/6/2017 5:46:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

i say "ON medication" because there's been some semblance of sense in a few fleeting places.

I sit corrected.




tj444 -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/6/2017 6:07:40 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: AtUrCervix

Ergo....EVERY person affected by DACA (and its rescission) has FOUR YEARS to resolve the issue while they wait for CONGRESS to do their job.



Certainly Dreamers cant rely on Congress to do their job (the definition of insanity is...)... How exactly are the Dreamers supposed to "resolve" the issue? they would need to apply for a visa but unless they have gotten an outstanding university education (or get an American fiance), what visa would qualify them? Dont you think that if there was a visa they could apply for, they would have already applied for it by now?.. There isnt any visa that would do that.. and of course, Trump is changing the rules on that anyway, if he goes to a point system or whatever other shite he pulls out of the air..

It really doesnt make any sense to kick them out, they are young, they have their whole working lives ahead of them to pay taxes, etc to support aging Americans..




BoscoX -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/6/2017 6:22:05 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

It really doesnt make any sense to kick them out, they are young, they have their whole working lives ahead of them to pay taxes, etc to support aging Americans..


Bring in meth and heroin, kidnap, rape, do drive-by shootings...

[image]http://cdn0.thetruthaboutguns.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/gang-members-courtesy-hispanicallyspeakingnews.com_.jpg[/image]




tamaka -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/6/2017 8:00:06 PM)

FR

If people can come here from another country illegally, breaking our laws, certainly American citizens should not be held accountable to any laws either.




tj444 -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/6/2017 8:06:17 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: tj444

It really doesnt make any sense to kick them out, they are young, they have their whole working lives ahead of them to pay taxes, etc to support aging Americans..


Bring in meth and heroin, kidnap, rape, do drive-by shootings...


OMG.. do you seriously think that illegal children who are into criminal activities applied for DACA???? why in hell would they? any illegal that commits & is convicted of a crime knows he will be deported (after serving time in jail).. duh..




vincentML -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/7/2017 7:37:48 AM)

quote:

Then who are we to blame? Do we not deport the kids along with the illegal family members? Are you going to support them being wards of the state and tearing families apart? Of course you're not. You're going to support the idea that "they're here, make 'em legal" which is counter to our immigration laws, isn't it? Send "Dreamers" back along with their illegal parents. Preserve the family!


Wards of the state? For the most part the dreamers are in their 20s and 30s. Some have served in the military. Some are at University. Some have families of their own. All that are working are taxpayers. So, considering them wards of the state just doesn’t fit the reality of their status.

quote:

It's also fair and just. You're opening every law in the Country up to subjective application. That isn't a nation of laws. That's a nation of discrimination, and not the USA.


A law is not fair and just until it is applied to human life. Then we can make a judgment as to its equity. The law itself is is a dead paragraph in a book. It is the application of the law that determines whether justice is served.

Since you chose to ignore it, I will repeat that it is a bedrock principle of our jurisprudence that children lack agency and they cannot be held responsible in the same way or to the same degree that adults are held responsible. That is the point in which we see whether our immigration laws can be applied with justice.





tamaka -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/7/2017 7:51:01 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML

quote:

Then who are we to blame? Do we not deport the kids along with the illegal family members? Are you going to support them being wards of the state and tearing families apart? Of course you're not. You're going to support the idea that "they're here, make 'em legal" which is counter to our immigration laws, isn't it? Send "Dreamers" back along with their illegal parents. Preserve the family!


Wards of the state? For the most part the dreamers are in their 20s and 30s. Some have served in the military. Some are at University. Some have families of their own. All that are working are taxpayers. So, considering them wards of the state just doesn’t fit the reality of their status.

quote:

It's also fair and just. You're opening every law in the Country up to subjective application. That isn't a nation of laws. That's a nation of discrimination, and not the USA.



Since you chose to ignore it, I will repeat that it is a bedrock principle of our jurisprudence that children lack agency and they cannot be held responsible in the same way or to the same degree that adults are held responsible.




Unless of course you're white. Then you are responsible for everything your ancesters did.




Lucylastic -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/7/2017 7:55:43 AM)

speak for yourself.




vincentML -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/7/2017 8:03:45 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

speak for yourself.

She does. That's why she is so amusing. [:D]




Lucylastic -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/7/2017 8:04:56 AM)

good point[:D]




DesideriScuri -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/7/2017 8:09:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML
quote:

Then who are we to blame? Do we not deport the kids along with the illegal family members? Are you going to support them being wards of the state and tearing families apart? Of course you're not. You're going to support the idea that "they're here, make 'em legal" which is counter to our immigration laws, isn't it? Send "Dreamers" back along with their illegal parents. Preserve the family!

Wards of the state? For the most part the dreamers are in their 20s and 30s. Some have served in the military. Some are at University. Some have families of their own. All that are working are taxpayers. So, considering them wards of the state just doesn’t fit the reality of their status.


So, now they are of majority age, but are still here illegally. Yep. No crimes being committed there. [8|]

quote:

quote:

It's also fair and just. You're opening every law in the Country up to subjective application. That isn't a nation of laws. That's a nation of discrimination, and not the USA.

A law is not fair and just until it is applied to human life. Then we can make a judgment as to its equity. The law itself is is a dead paragraph in a book. It is the application of the law that determines whether justice is served.
Since you chose to ignore it, I will repeat that it is a bedrock principle of our jurisprudence that children lack agency and they cannot be held responsible in the same way or to the same degree that adults are held responsible. That is the point in which we see whether our immigration laws can be applied with justice.


You just said they are in their 20's and 30's. They are no longer children, and they are still here illegally. They are adults and should be treated thus, right?

Make up your mind, Vincent. Illegal presence is not legal. It's kinda in the name, afterall.




DesideriScuri -> RE: US scraps young undocumented immigrants scheme (9/7/2017 8:12:46 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tamaka
Unless of course you're white. Then you are responsible for everything your ancesters did.


That one sailed waaaay over their heads.

The "Christian precepts" thing went uncommented on after I put it in a post, too.




Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875