quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: BlackSinMaster

A good clean murder I feel. After the first bullet, where they were screaming for their life and mercy, it is good to know the pumped them with another six so as to shut the moaning fucker up.

If the cop wanted to murder he why did the cop use a taser first?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

Taze him once, and shoot 7 times?
Come on

There was more than one cop on the scene, the suspect appears to have not been armed.
He was drunk or high or mentally ill.
If he did not go down after being tazed, being shot 7 times is still excessive.

We can go round and round here.
We agree that many people can not control how many shots are fired with automatic weapons pages ago.

If nothing else here, I learned that cops often can't control how many shots are being fired these days, because of the high powered weaponry.
The days of revolvers and being shot once seem to be a thing of the past.
I come away with that FACT.

But this isnt about how many shots were fired, its about the fact that shots were fired in the first place. That cop was in no danger and even if the guy did go for his gun he did not get it, shooting him after the fact with that as an excuse is just that a bullshit excuse to commit murder.

Now if he had the cops gun and another cop wasted him I'd rest my case, but the cop maintained complete control of the gun and there is no video evidence what so ever showing the guys hands near the gun.

Many people who suffer execution by trigger finger rambo are mentally ill and merely resisting arrest.

You certainly have a valid point here.
Thing is charging at an officer, attempting to take his gun/and or magazine, means a high probability that you will get shot these days.
So again, like in my OP, shooting an unarmed suspect 7 times, is excessive.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

Taze him once, and shoot 7 times?
Come on

There was more than one cop on the scene, the suspect appears to have not been armed.
He was drunk or high or mentally ill.
If he did not go down after being tazed, being shot 7 times is still excessive.

We can go round and round here.
We agree that many people can not control how many shots are fired with automatic weapons pages ago.

If nothing else here, I learned that cops often can't control how many shots are being fired these days, because of the high powered weaponry.
The days of revolvers and being shot once seem to be a thing of the past.
I come away with that FACT.

But this isnt about how many shots were fired, its about the fact that shots were fired in the first place. That cop was in no danger and even if the guy did go for his gun he did not get it, shooting him after the fact with that as an excuse is just that a bullshit excuse to commit murder.

Now if he had the cops gun and another cop wasted him I'd rest my case, but the cop maintained complete control of the gun and there is no video evidence what so ever showing the guys hands near the gun.

Many people who suffer execution by trigger finger rambo are mentally ill and merely resisting arrest.

You certainly have a valid point here.
Thing is charging at an officer, attempting to take his gun/and or magazine, means a high probability that you will get shot these days.
So again, like in my OP, shooting an unarmed suspect 7 times, is excessive.

Attempting to take an officers weapon has always meant you will end up shot.
The thing that has changed is that today if you actually take it you will go to jail, unless you try to soot it out with the cops.
30 years ago when the other cops caught you they would kill you, period.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

Taze him once, and shoot 7 times?
Come on

There was more than one cop on the scene, the suspect appears to have not been armed.
He was drunk or high or mentally ill.
If he did not go down after being tazed, being shot 7 times is still excessive.

We can go round and round here.
We agree that many people can not control how many shots are fired with automatic weapons pages ago.

If nothing else here, I learned that cops often can't control how many shots are being fired these days, because of the high powered weaponry.
The days of revolvers and being shot once seem to be a thing of the past.
I come away with that FACT.

But this isnt about how many shots were fired, its about the fact that shots were fired in the first place. That cop was in no danger and even if the guy did go for his gun he did not get it, shooting him after the fact with that as an excuse is just that a bullshit excuse to commit murder.

Now if he had the cops gun and another cop wasted him I'd rest my case, but the cop maintained complete control of the gun and there is no video evidence what so ever showing the guys hands near the gun.

Many people who suffer execution by trigger finger rambo are mentally ill and merely resisting arrest.

You certainly have a valid point here.
Thing is charging at an officer, attempting to take his gun/and or magazine, means a high probability that you will get shot these days.
So again, like in my OP, shooting an unarmed suspect 7 times, is excessive.

Attempting to take an officers weapon has always meant you will end up shot.
The thing that has changed is that today if you actually take it you will go to jail, unless you try to soot it out with the cops.
30 years ago when the other cops caught you they would kill you, period.

lol, Bama if you try to take a cops gun today, they will shoot you 7 times with their semi automatic, which is what this thread is about.

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

But shouldn't there be protests in the streets? I mean was not the Ferguson incident the same?

Butch

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini

Taze him once, and shoot 7 times?
Come on

There was more than one cop on the scene, the suspect appears to have not been armed.
He was drunk or high or mentally ill.
If he did not go down after being tazed, being shot 7 times is still excessive.

We can go round and round here.
We agree that many people can not control how many shots are fired with automatic weapons pages ago.

If nothing else here, I learned that cops often can't control how many shots are being fired these days, because of the high powered weaponry.
The days of revolvers and being shot once seem to be a thing of the past.
I come away with that FACT.

But this isnt about how many shots were fired, its about the fact that shots were fired in the first place. That cop was in no danger and even if the guy did go for his gun he did not get it, shooting him after the fact with that as an excuse is just that a bullshit excuse to commit murder.

Now if he had the cops gun and another cop wasted him I'd rest my case, but the cop maintained complete control of the gun and there is no video evidence what so ever showing the guys hands near the gun.

Many people who suffer execution by trigger finger rambo are mentally ill and merely resisting arrest.

You certainly have a valid point here.
Thing is charging at an officer, attempting to take his gun/and or magazine, means a high probability that you will get shot these days.
So again, like in my OP, shooting an unarmed suspect 7 times, is excessive.

Attempting to take an officers weapon has always meant you will end up shot.
The thing that has changed is that today if you actually take it you will go to jail, unless you try to soot it out with the cops.
30 years ago when the other cops caught you they would kill you, period.

lol, Bama if you try to take a cops gun today, they will shoot you 7 times with their semi automatic, which is what this thread is about.

Yep,i f he is trying to take your gun it is reasonable to assume he isn't doing it to hang on the wall.
It is reasonable to assume he is going to use it on you, so yes he is going to shoot till you stop moving,
his life depends on it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Marini
The suspect looks like a very young man, GRANTED he did grab for the officer's gun.