tweakabelle -> RE: Two Powerful Men Assail a pregnant young military widow (10/26/2017 7:26:27 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BoscoX quote:
ORIGINAL: JVoV quote:
ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr I've said similar before and I'll say it, again: If we were talking about President (She-cunt) Clinton and I chose to assail her in regards to the death of my son, publicly, I would expect the entire weight of the PPL machine to "come after me". The difference in this scenario was this young widow didn't start this kerfuffle, it was an asshole congress critter who shamelessly dragged Mrs. Johnson into this. I pray there's a place for this congress critter, when her time comes. Michael The grieving widow was extremely upset by the call, because Trump didn't even know her husband's name. Rep Frederica Wilson has been very involved with this family for about a decade. She spoke to the press when the family was not yet able, acting as a friend. And she has been lied about by General Kelly. Lied about by President Trump. She's an 'empty barrel' to the administration because they don't give a fuck what any black woman would have to say, especially a black woman already in office. Video evidence shows the speech she gave at the FBI Building dedication, proving General Kelly is willing to lie to the American public for Trump. They CLAIMED the president didn't say his name, which the president disagrees. Your knee-jerk reaction is to fall for they hysteria because you're a far left twit with an agenda just like the widow is, and just like the"rock star" cowboy congressman who is using the widow is Leftist trash sinks to a new low - politicizing a call to a soldier's widow. Now it's about race, too? Fuck off, little troll Trump, in his first tweet on this issue claimed to have "proof" that his account of this matter was correct, and that the family and the Congresswoman's account was incorrect. If memory serves me well, he accused them of falsifying the record. So where is this "proof"? If it exists, why hasn't Trump released it? Why have all the subsequent revelations either confirmed or added weight to the widow's version of event? Why has no evidence supporting Trump's version (other than the repeated re-assertions of Trump's version coming from Trump himself or his staff) entered the public domain? One would reasonably think that if the proof exists, the President could very quickly and conclusively end the controversy in a manner that would boost his image* by releasing the proof for us all to see. Equally a failure to release this "proof" adds weight to accounts of this matter that show Trump handled the matter with an appalling lack of sensitivity, simple empathy and compassion. And of course, if this "proof" was in the public domain, people like you who like to find excuses for all of Trump's excesses wouldn't have to resort to inventing absurd conspiracy theories, claims of "set-ups" and bad mouthing the widow of a soldier who died in his country's service to excuse yet another piece of atrocious callous behaviour by Trump. * boosting his own image is matter very close to Trump's heart, if the amount of self promotion and self aggrandisement he engages in is anything to go by ....
|
|
|
|