quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

Well, you shouldn't be able to buy your own political party, but that's not exactly what happened.

What happened is more like there was one candidate who was willing to support the party (the money she raised also went to other Democrats) and one who wasn't, and the one who supported the party received more support in return. If there were more than 2 candidates, then it would probably look a lot different right now.

Bernie's REFUSAL to do joint fundraising with wealthy donors was more of a factor than Hillary's willingness to do it.
A third candidate COULD have enjoyed the same treatment Hillary received provided they also fulfilled their obligations under the program and didn't refuse to participate in it.

Basically, Bernie is responsible for his own downfall, and refusing to own it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

FFS Bosco, can you even discuss ANY topic without changing it?

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

FFS Bosco, can you even discuss ANY topic without changing it?

Same deflection you howlers howl every time something is posted that you cannot deny

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

Well, you shouldn't be able to buy your own political party, but that's not exactly what happened.

What happened is more like there was one candidate who was willing to support the party (the money she raised also went to other Democrats) and one who wasn't, and the one who supported the party received more support in return. If there were more than 2 candidates, then it would probably look a lot different right now.

Bernie's REFUSAL to do joint fundraising with wealthy donors was more of a factor than Hillary's willingness to do it.
A third candidate COULD have enjoyed the same treatment Hillary received provided they also fulfilled their obligations under the program and didn't refuse to participate in it.

Basically, Bernie is responsible for his own downfall, and refusing to own it.

She bought and paid for it as an investment because there were massive profits to be made from said purchase (see the Uranium One deal for a perfect example)

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

FFS Bosco, can you even discuss ANY topic without changing it?

Same deflection you howlers howl every time something is posted that you cannot deny

You post this while ignoring the rest of what I said, and I am deflecting.
Okay.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Why address your empty-headed howling

It means nothing. You're (as always) throwing everything against the wall desperately hoping that something sticks

Nothing is sticking, your pussyhat queen hacked the election purely for personal profit

quote:

ORIGINAL: SeekingMnD

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

Well, you shouldn't be able to buy your own political party, but that's not exactly what happened.

What happened is more like there was one candidate who was willing to support the party (the money she raised also went to other Democrats) and one who wasn't, and the one who supported the party received more support in return. If there were more than 2 candidates, then it would probably look a lot different right now.

Bernie's REFUSAL to do joint fundraising with wealthy donors was more of a factor than Hillary's willingness to do it.
A third candidate COULD have enjoyed the same treatment Hillary received provided they also fulfilled their obligations under the program and didn't refuse to participate in it.

Basically, Bernie is responsible for his own downfall, and refusing to own it.

She bought and paid for it as an investment because there were massive profits to be made from said purchase (see the Uranium One deal for a perfect example)

Brilliant. The rightist deranged howlers have the goods now. Here is a 9 Cabinet Department committee in which all 9 cabinet departments recommended to the President the sale of stock, and the Uranium is for domestic use here in the US, none of it may leave the country. And if bad times come, a great gob of assets to freeze in sanctions. I can see why the deranged rightist howlers are snowflaking and butthurting for their Russian communist masters over this. But since they are ineffective in all endeavors, their time may be better spent creating a flurry of investigations and calling it Niger! Niger! Niger!

Way to scoop it with some real insider nothingness Xmeister.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: SeekingMnD

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

Well, you shouldn't be able to buy your own political party, but that's not exactly what happened.

What happened is more like there was one candidate who was willing to support the party (the money she raised also went to other Democrats) and one who wasn't, and the one who supported the party received more support in return. If there were more than 2 candidates, then it would probably look a lot different right now.

Bernie's REFUSAL to do joint fundraising with wealthy donors was more of a factor than Hillary's willingness to do it.
A third candidate COULD have enjoyed the same treatment Hillary received provided they also fulfilled their obligations under the program and didn't refuse to participate in it.

Basically, Bernie is responsible for his own downfall, and refusing to own it.

She bought and paid for it as an investment because there were massive profits to be made from said purchase (see the Uranium One deal for a perfect example)

Brilliant. The rightist deranged howlers have the goods now. Here is a 9 Cabinet Department committee in which all 9 cabinet departments recommended to the President the sale of stock, and the Uranium is for domestic use here in the US, none of it may leave the country. And if bad times come, a great gob of assets to freeze in sanctions. I can see why the deranged rightist howlers are snowflaking and butthurting for their Russian communist masters over this. But since they are ineffective in all endeavors, their time may be better spent creating a flurry of investigations and calling it Niger! Niger! Niger!

Way to scoop it with some real insider nothingness Xmeister.

Hey mnottertroll

How does it feel to be banned from howling “felchgobble this” and “felchgobble that”

quote:

Russian communist masters

quote:

ORIGINAL: WhoreMods

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: SeekingMnD

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker

Well, you shouldn't be able to buy your own political party, but that's not exactly what happened.

What happened is more like there was one candidate who was willing to support the party (the money she raised also went to other Democrats) and one who wasn't, and the one who supported the party received more support in return. If there were more than 2 candidates, then it would probably look a lot different right now.

Bernie's REFUSAL to do joint fundraising with wealthy donors was more of a factor than Hillary's willingness to do it.
A third candidate COULD have enjoyed the same treatment Hillary received provided they also fulfilled their obligations under the program and didn't refuse to participate in it.

Basically, Bernie is responsible for his own downfall, and refusing to own it.

She bought and paid for it as an investment because there were massive profits to be made from said purchase (see the Uranium One deal for a perfect example)

Brilliant. The rightist deranged howlers have the goods now. Here is a 9 Cabinet Department committee in which all 9 cabinet departments recommended to the President the sale of stock, and the Uranium is for domestic use here in the US, none of it may leave the country. And if bad times come, a great gob of assets to freeze in sanctions. I can see why the deranged rightist howlers are snowflaking and butthurting for their Russian communist masters over this. But since they are ineffective in all endeavors, their time may be better spent creating a flurry of investigations and calling it Niger! Niger! Niger!

Way to scoop it with some real insider nothingness Xmeister.

Hey mnottertroll

How does it feel to be banned from howling “felchgobble this” and “felchgobble that”

That isn't Ron, you fuckwit.
And you know exactly how that feels, Sanitary.

quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX
Hey mnottertroll

How does it feel to be banned from howling “felchgobble this” and “felchgobble that”

quote:

You getting your rightist slobbering howling derangement on again, old geezer?

quote:

ORIGINAL: playfultom62

So, you are finally kissing up to Donna Brazile. I knew you were like that.

quote:

ORIGINAL: heavyblinker
And wow, I hadn't seen this, but it's official:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/10/22/sanders-keeps-em-guessing-bernie-to-seek-senate-reelection-as-independent-amid-2020-talk.html
Wow, what a surprise.
Why didn't the DNC want him as their nominee?
He's so dedicated!

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)
  

quote:

ORIGINAL: Edwird
I, too, am somewhat wary of someone who is born just 8 months before Paul McCartney. How effing ancient can you get?
That said, I don't know any 70 yr. old who talks like a high-strung 15 yr. old like Trump does, and this is 'what's on the cart,' now.
Jeebus.
Not exactly the 'voice of authority' that some might wish for.
I can tell you this, though;
Bernie had almost as many 15-18 yr. old girls all excited a year ago as McCartney did 40 yrs. ago.
Just going by my niece's facebook and her friends.
Not that that means anything.
The rest of us acted all grown-up and voted for the hyena.

• A Conservative interpretation of the US Constitution
  
• Personal Responsibility
  
• Help for the truly needy
  
• Limited Government
  
• Consumption Tax (non-profit charities and food exempt)