jlf1961 -> RE: At "least" 27 People killed in Texas church (11/7/2017 7:51:15 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Lucylastic quote:
ORIGINAL: jlf1961 You want to blame guns? WHO are you talking to? What is the difference between say Canada, UK, France, Germany and the US regarding murder rates? Now the difference between them and gun deaths You can try to squirrel out of it, but the fact is that guns in the hands of killers are EXACTLY the problem. so no its not blaming guns, its blaming the nutballs that have guns handily available. Across the world crime is a problem, murder is a problem, but gun deaths? not in the same numbers as the US. So, once more your statement is blaming everyone that has a gun for the problem, not just the less than one percent of gun owners that decide for whatever reason to go out and kill someone? And yes, comparing a mass shooter to McVeigh is appropriate, considering that many of you seem to think that owning a gun means that the owner is intending to go out and kill someone, without realizing that if someone wants to kill a lot of people, they will do so with or without a gun. But since you want to compare the US to the rest of the world, it is also necessary that you are not actually comparing the US to the rest of the world, just first world countries, because, there is statistical proof that the US is 31st in the number of gun deaths world wide. source So, what does that do to your argument? It proves one thing, you are not comparing the US to the rest of the world, but a selected group of countries. Of course, when you look at over all murder rates, the US is not even in the top ten, but again, you are comparing the US to just a small group of selected countries, specifically Western Europe, Canada and Australia. Neglecting of course the former Russia and former soviet republics (all of which have some very strict gun control laws) and much higher murder rates overall. Nor do any of you actually admit that, even with the mass killings taken into the count, gun deaths in the US is at the lowest point in 20 years, so we must be doing something right. No the real issue is not that the United States has legal and nominally restricted private gun ownership, the real issue is that the US is not doing it the way a select group of countries have done it. Nor does the fact seem to matter that in this particular case, the shooter used a weapon that is not sold at the standard firearms retailer, he used a weapon that is specifically marketed to law enforcement. Seriously, you cant go to Walmart or some other place and buy that weapon. Of course, as I said earlier, there is the question as to why the US Air Force did not report his court martial conviction and crime nor his dishonorable discharge to the proper agency which would have kept him from buying a gun in the first place. A problem I have been ranting about in every debate on the issue. And of course, you will once more make the claim I am attributing statements to you that you did not make, which is why I highlighted the specific part. If you do not mean all gun owners, just the less than one percent who do stuff like this, then do not make broad general statements, and please, get your facts straight.
|
|
|
|