RE: More allegations of misconduct (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


BoscoX -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 6:46:09 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: BoscoX


quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam


quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

The liberals didn't seem to care when Bill Clinton did what he was doing. Now they are outraged.

But Hillary, but Bill, But Obama.[sm=runaway.gif]


Leftist trash is all hypocrisy all the time.

Keep outing yourself as a leftist troll boy [sm=lol.gif]


What exactly do you get out of posting sheer stupidity... [:D]

Even among your drooler friends, how many think I lean left in any way.



The last time a Dem won a senate race in Alabama it was Shelby.
The day before the election the Dems did a push poll asking if people would be less likely to vote for the Rep
if they knew he had said that women shouldn't be allowed to vote.
Naturally Shelby did really well in the women's vote.
His opponent never said that but by the time people found out the election was over.
Be for you remind me how stupid I am since Shelby is a Rep. he switched parties early in his first term.
For many of us in Alabama this looks like the same thing.


That post was in response to hill billy, not you.




BamaD -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 7:55:50 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk

how is it a dirty trick by the dems for a guy to run as a dem and then switch to republican? wouldn't any reasonable man put that in the republican dirty trick column?

but I dont think that makes Shelby a child molester, nor do most view it as misconduct.



You don't read so good do you? I never said that Shelby switching parties was a dirty trick.
If you had been paying attention you would have known that the dirty trick was putting a lie
into the campaign when it was too late to disprove it. I only mentioned Shelby switching parties because I knew someone
would try to make it about me allegedly thinking he was a Dem , which he was at the time.
Now I don't think you are too stupid to know that, you are just trying
to distract from the fact that making up something that can't be disproven by the election
is SOP for the Alabama Dem party in a close election.




MasterDrakk -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 8:41:00 AM)

oh, no dont get me wrong, I read your unfactual, uncited piece, and since my original comment was beyond your ken, there would be no doubt you wouldn't get to level one, having failed so miserably at level zero.

I am just fuckin with ya.




BamaD -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 10:33:52 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk

oh, no dont get me wrong, I read your unfactual, uncited piece, and since my original comment was beyond your ken, there would be no doubt you wouldn't get to level one, having failed so miserably at level zero.

I am just fuckin with ya.

Just because you don't what to accept the facts doesn't mean it didn't happen.




bounty44 -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 10:46:08 AM)

bama, you know theres a pretty good chance that's mnottertroll right? or if not, someone making a conscious effort to sound (minus the felchgobbles) like him.




WhoreMods -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 12:01:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BamaD
Just because you don't want to accept the facts doesn't mean it didn't happen.

Why ever not?
It does when the dismissed facts involve the theory of evolution or industrial emissions having any influence on climate change: constant repetition of denials are all that's required then. Why should this be any different?




Wayward5oul -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 12:42:06 PM)

FR
http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/11/12/new-poll-reveals-what-the-roy-moore-scandal-has-done-to-his-chances-of-winning-bid-for-senate

Almost a third of respondents polled are more likely to vote for Moore now, after the allegations.

And 37% of evangelicals are more likely to vote for him.
http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/825628?section=Politics&keywords=evangelicals-roy-moore-less-likely-vote-after-sexual-allegations&year=2017&month=11&date=12&id=825628&aliaspath=%2FManage%2FArticles%2FTemplate-Main&oref=www.google.com




BoscoX -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 12:57:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul

FR
http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/11/12/new-poll-reveals-what-the-roy-moore-scandal-has-done-to-his-chances-of-winning-bid-for-senate

Almost a third of respondents polled are more likely to vote for Moore now, after the allegations.

And 37% of evangelicals are more likely to vote for him.
http://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/825628?section=Politics&keywords=evangelicals-roy-moore-less-likely-vote-after-sexual-allegations&year=2017&month=11&date=12&id=825628&aliaspath=%2FManage%2FArticles%2FTemplate-Main&oref=www.google.com


Primarily because the unhinged far left howler media has fully exposed itself.

Went completely off the deep end after their historic loss against president Trump - now, whatever they report people correctly assume that the opposite must be true




Lucylastic -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 1:20:40 PM)

Republicans: “We believe Hillary Clinton ran a child sex ring in the basement of a pizza parlor that had no basement.”

Republicans: “We don't believe the major news story with 30 sources about a Republican molester. Besides, age 14 is basically like 24 these days.”




LadyPact -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 1:26:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
bama, you know theres a pretty good chance that's mnottertroll right? or if not, someone making a conscious effort to sound (minus the felchgobbles) like him.

You do understand that every time you've stated a sock puppet had mnot behind it, it's turned out to be WD.





DaddySatyr -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 1:29:01 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

You do understand that every time you've stated a sock puppet had mnot behind it, it's turned out to be WD.




More's the pity. It means that the level of discourse on this site has sunk to a depressing level, if it's being exhibited by more than one of that ilk.






Wayward5oul -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 1:31:47 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
bama, you know theres a pretty good chance that's mnottertroll right? or if not, someone making a conscious effort to sound (minus the felchgobbles) like him.

You do understand that every time you've stated a sock puppet had mnot behind it, it's turned out to be WD.



That is true, although this time I don't think it's WD. I don't know if it's Ron, but it's not WD.

That said, it does seem like bounty misses Ron or something. He is always bringing him up, even when he isn't around.




WhoreMods -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 1:35:44 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Wayward5oul


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
bama, you know theres a pretty good chance that's mnottertroll right? or if not, someone making a conscious effort to sound (minus the felchgobbles) like him.

You do understand that every time you've stated a sock puppet had mnot behind it, it's turned out to be WD.



That is true, although this time I don't think it's WD. I don't know if it's Ron, but it's not WD.

That said, it does seem like bounty misses Ron or something. He is always bringing him up, even when he isn't around.


I think MM nailed that with the comments about him being Ron's bitch.




bounty44 -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 1:47:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
bama, you know theres a pretty good chance that's mnottertroll right? or if not, someone making a conscious effort to sound (minus the felchgobbles) like him.

You do understand that every time you've stated a sock puppet had mnot behind it, it's turned out to be WD.




um no---there might have been one time where I questioned and asked who it was and there was one time where it was the stwrinklemeat profile, which used to be used by mnottertroll---so it remains a mystery how wd got into it. if anyone knows the answer to that, id love to hear it.

there was an instance or two where someone showed up, made only a post or two, and then disappeared.

wd has never shown the type of "normalcy" that this new profile is showing and there are at least a half dozen words/phrases and interactions that point overwhelmingly to mnottertroll, and not to wd.

the only way its the latter (but not necessarily the former) is that he's made a conscious effort to study and mimic those words/phrase and predilections---but again, every example of his posts for the past many months, if not years, show him to be incapable of that.





BamaD -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 2:49:51 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44

bama, you know theres a pretty good chance that's mnottertroll right? or if not, someone making a conscious effort to sound (minus the felchgobbles) like him.

Could be, they lack contact with reality.




Danemora -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 3:01:02 PM)

Pretty spot on assessment, Bounty. WD is very easy to pick out for easily seen reasons. I dont know much about how mnottertail began around here since I started coming to this forum during the "putinjizz" "felchgobblin" over and over again phase. So thats really all I know about mnottertail though




MasterDrakk -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 3:18:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

You do understand that every time you've stated a sock puppet had mnot behind it, it's turned out to be WD.




More's the pity. It means that the level of discourse on this site has sunk to a depressing level, if it's being exhibited by more than one of that ilk.




Many more on this site think that you and your little band of brothers sink the discourse to a very dismal level.

and lets face it you got the Arturas, Nancy, LTE and who knows how many other socks, so that band of yours is not a half dozen in reality.




LadyPact -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 3:25:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bounty44
um no---there might have been one time where I questioned and asked who it was and there was one time where it was the stwrinklemeat profile, which used to be used by mnottertroll---so it remains a mystery how wd got into it. if anyone knows the answer to that, id love to hear it.

There is actually a way to do that if certain things about an old account apply. It's a very weird loophole that the site has always had and I don't know if it was ever fixed or not. (It became very evident on a thread three or four years ago, so there are some posters who know how it works.) It's not the same thing as the recent phenomenon of people attempting to log into their own profile and are suddenly making forum posts under another name. Different thing.

On this one, you're going to take me at my word or not. It would be a horrible idea for me to detail how the trick works because it would just lead to more crap. There are some other forums posters that could tell you I'm right, though.

quote:

there was an instance or two where someone showed up, made only a post or two, and then disappeared.

Yes, and I'm fairly confident that has to do with people reporting WD's socks as WD circumventing moderation. I've reported three of them, myself. I know I'm not the only person who has done so, which means I can't tell you how many WD socks are now also under moderation.

quote:

wd has never shown the type of "normalcy" that this new profile is showing and there are at least a half dozen words/phrases and interactions that point overwhelmingly to mnottertroll, and not to wd.

On other occasions, this is exactly how WD has got you into thinking that any given sock is mn. If you wanted to try to impersonate somebody, wouldn't you try to duplicate their posting style? He's fooled you a few times already.

quote:

the only way its the latter (but not necessarily the former) is that he's made a conscious effort to study and mimic those words/phrase and predilections---but again, every example of his posts for the past many months, if not years, show him to be incapable of that.

This is also incorrect. WD can and has had decent points of lucidity. It's how he lures some people in. I can't say it as fact but it seems to unravel during times he's drank too much or has past the point of lacking sleep/rest.

I'm semi-confident in this statement. I wouldn't have to study much to impersonate a lot of people on these boards. If I were a dishonest individual, I could probably pull it off.





DaddySatyr -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 3:47:45 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk
Many more on this site think that you and your little band of brothers sink the discourse to a very dismal level.

and lets face it you got the Arturas, Nancy, LTE and who knows how many other socks, so that band of yours is not a half dozen in reality.


There, there, ronnie. You want to start naming names? Numbersix? Thompsonx? (One who shall remain nameless since they're supposedly no longer with us) Edwird? Tweakabelle? (Those are just the ones who've pissed on my son's memory) You like being part of that little "club".

Sober up and live right. There was a time when you actually contributed something (albeit, usually in an insulting manner) to these boards.






MasterDrakk -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/12/2017 3:56:14 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: DaddySatyr


quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterDrakk
Many more on this site think that you and your little band of brothers sink the discourse to a very dismal level.

and lets face it you got the Arturas, Nancy, LTE and who knows how many other socks, so that band of yours is not a half dozen in reality.


There, there, ronnie. You want to start naming names? Numbersix? Thompsonx? (One who shall remain nameless since they're supposedly no longer with us) Edwird? Tweakabelle? (Those are just the ones who've pissed on my son's memory) You like being part of that little "club".

Sober up and live right. There was a time when you actually contributed something (albeit, usually in an insulting manner) to these boards.




there there little mikey, go fill your diaper again you old drunken fool. there has never been a time you have contributed anything.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625