|
bounty44 -> RE: More allegations of misconduct (11/13/2017 4:19:07 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: LadyPact
quote:
wd has never shown the type of "normalcy" that this new profile is showing and there are at least a half dozen words/phrases and interactions that point overwhelmingly to mnottertroll, and not to wd.
On other occasions, this is exactly how WD has got you into thinking that any given sock is mn. If you wanted to try to impersonate somebody, wouldn't you try to duplicate their posting style? He's fooled you a few times already.
quote:
the only way its the latter (but not necessarily the former) is that he's made a conscious effort to study and mimic those words/phrase and predilections---but again, every example of his posts for the past many months, if not years, show him to be incapable of that.
This is also incorrect. WD can and has had decent points of lucidity. It's how he lures some people in. I can't say it as fact but it seems to unravel during times he's drank too much or has past the point of lacking sleep/rest.
I'm semi-confident in this statement. I wouldn't have to study much to impersonate a lot of people on these boards. If I were a dishonest individual, I could probably pull it off.
as I said, to my memory, wd had only got me wondering, briefly once, when I questioned a particular profile if it was mnottertroll or not. and it was a post that had limited words and from a profile that had only posted a little bit. I don't call that being fooled.
we're in stark disagreement over wd's mental abilities and the cause of his deficits.
also in disagreement over anyone's ability to sound like someone else, repeatedly, over time. is it possible, sure, but it would actually take a fair amount of skill and more than a modicum of studying. you see wd being able to pull that off? you think this new profile is actually him as opposed to mnottertroll?
when I see a large handful of words/phrases used again (and used naturally) and certain predilections recurring, it being mnottertroll is by far the easier and more likely conclusion.
since folks might be wondering, heres a short list of drakk usage that identifies with mnottertroll:
with maybe one exception in the past two years, the only person to use the word "xtian" in place of "Christian" has been mnottertroll. about 70ish times.
with just 3-4 exceptions, use of the word "fuckin" has been mnottertroll, ~30-40 times.
"factless propaganda" is a mnottertroll phrase
use of the word "diaper" is a favorite of mnottertrolls.
(interestingly---some of those words/phrases are no longer showing up for drakk in a search)
here's a few other things:
drakk's first appearance was in the Hillary thread, which has been a magnet for mnottertroll and his first post was directly after a moderated attempt by "numbersix" to post.
drakk's treatment of bama, blatantly insulting his intelligence, in recent interactions are consistent with mnottertrolls interactions with bama. by contrast, wd was repeatedly praiseworthy of bama in their interactions.
drakk made a point of hearkening back to mnottertroll criticisms of judge nap in response to a post I made that included an article from him.
referring to certain people on the right as "cowards" is predominantly a mnottertroll thing.
wd would reply to everyone/anything willy nilly in order to have interaction. drakk's responses are specific to threads and to people that in the past were mnottertroll spots.
drakk comes and goes (starting early in the morning) consistent with someone who has work to attend to, in the way mnottertroll's appearances would be. by contrast wd often would post straight for many hours on end, showing up later in the day.
the recent interaction with Michael above includes the oft-mentioned and favorite mnottertroll place, airport bathrooms (although I suppose that is an easy one to mimic)
it also includes the somewhat frequently referred to sentiment, despite evidence to the contrary (consistent with mnottertroll stupidity) of "there has never been a time you have contributed here."
it also includes a reference to a post made by Michael, made in support of drakk's contention (of Michael's being a drunk)---which came out of nowhere, and which doesn't actually support the contention---both of which are consistent with mnottertrolls style and ability.
referring to a group of people on the right as a "band of..." is a mnottertroll thing.
if its not mnottertroll, someones doing a bang-up of job of pretending to be so.
|
|
|
|
