scottjk
Posts: 335
Joined: 4/18/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: bignipples2share quote:
scottjk SwtMazokst, I would label you as a switch, simply because you are a professional Domme and probably a private sub. Ah, but her listing as a switch is not what she is looking for. If your job is being a lawyer, that has nothing to do with your being dom or sub, therefore what she does most of the time is Dom, it does not mean that she is not sub. And what catagory is Dark then? She is a Top submissive. What label is that? Or me for that matter, I say I top from the bottom, but I actually don't consider myself sub, I just like some things that are considered sub. I guess I'm looking for a sub who can act dom lol...put a label on THAT one. ~Big You'll have to read Swt's posting a little more closely. I read it as a Pro Domme, with a desire for a very dominant man in her private life. While she's chosen a career as a Pro Domme, and does presentations and seminars as a Pro Domme, she views it as a means of serving others as a means to adress her needs. Switch is non-specific enough to use, although she has expressed a desire to be at least emotionally submissive to some one in a relationship. It gives me a frame of reference to relate to, that's all. It doesn't matter what she's 'looking for' in terms of how she labels herself, if at all. What matters is the context in how I relate to her. She may not care if I tell her I'm dom, but if I want her to relate to me better, that's what I'll inform her, out of courtesy. As for Dark, top works. Again, it's general enough to understand and relate to her, for the same reason. But that's based on limited information and I would, if desired, inquire further. She doesn't go into detail, but that's her choice. As for you, bignipples, based on your limited info, I would consider a bottom. This is based on your profile. If I'm way off base, then I would advise being a little more clear in your profile. Again, it's a GENERAL label. Overall, everyone, if you're offended because a label isn't specific enough, you're barking up the wrong tree. Many labels aren't intended to be specifc, and avoiding them entirely, and the arguments for doing so, simply hinders communications, and the ability to relate. If you want to make it easier for those of us that use labels (majority of people), the sensible thing would be to use them. Just because one sub isn't like another, or a dom is not like another is non-sequitor and entirely besides the point. A non-argument. Now, if we were all telepathic, life would be good and this discussion would be completely pointless, as we would know the instant we made contact what each other's preferences are. Scince that doesn't happen, guess what? We use labels, then refine them as we learn more things that are specific to that person.
|