Aine
Posts: 820
Joined: 4/12/2005 Status: offline
|
Going on what seems from reading the current posts as a slightly different approach, here's what I think on this subject. For people that are together strictly for play and aren't together 24/7, sure, I think that in general if you look at JUST the play portion of things, it tends to lend to better times for both parties if they were compatible on many -play- levels. Having the same kinks, likes/dislikes, fetishes etc, etc would make for a good time. For people that are in a more relationship-based thing with D/s-BDSM a big part or even a smaller part of who they are as a couple that is living together 24/7 (not saying that the relationship is 24/7 D/s here, people), I think that having the same likes and dislikes is a wonderful thing for compatibility. But I've noticed from those that I've talked to or observed, for some reason those that have a truly loving relationship together aside from play and scenes are more willing tobe flexible with each other's likes and dislikes and compromise a lot more. This is not fact, I'm not saying that it is, it is merely -my observation-. But, do I think that people need to be molded and essentially changed in their own beliefs and day-to-day ways in order to be with someone? Abso-fucking-lutely not. If someone is willing to change their entire being for someone, hell, have at it. Kudos to you. To each their own, etc etc. To me, it's all about compromise and communication all around. Be straight forward, be open, be adamant about what you believe (hard limits of ANY kind). Over time, things may change, your attitude might change as most people do, adapt as you see fit and are comfortable with. But I don't see why someone should compromise what makes them who they are for another person.
_____________________________
Honey, you obviously missed the "want to be used as a toilet fetish" thread or "where do I get instructions on setting my sub on fire" thread. LOL Thank you, DelRay for that one.
|