Daddy4UdderSlut -> RE: Coming soon - new viruses in your bologna, and bacteria in your toothpaste - Mmmmmm! (8/22/2006 9:34:20 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: juliaoceania No company is going to invest in clinical trials for herbs they cannot patent They never release the numbers of people harmed by pharmecutical drugs. I am not saying I will never take them, but most of the time the cure is worse than the disease in my mind. Well, the first statement is true. Clinical trials are extremely expensive, and can only be justified when there is a substantial return, which normally means some exclusivity in market position. Note though, that nothing prevents drug companies from identifying and then developing the active ingredients of any natural remedy, and then patenting it, assuming it is found to be safe and effective. This is just what drug companies do when they do drug discovery among natural products. Drug companies typically have large libraries of natural products of interest, on the order of 100,000 or more. As to no followup on safety issues in the marketplace, I quote: quote:
CDER evaluates the safety profiles of drugs available to American consumers using a variety of tools and disciplines throughout the life cycle of the drugs. We maintain a system of postmarketing surveillance and risk assessment programs to identify adverse events that did not appear during the drug development process. We learn about adverse events through required reporting by companies and through voluntary reports submitted to FDA’s MedWatch program, which together total more than 250,000 reports per year. And as to the safety information being hidden from consumers, I suggest taking a look at the free information portal at the Office for Drug Safety at the FDA: http://www.fda.gov/cder/Offices/ODS/default.htm Most drugs have multiple side effects. The more that one learns about molecular biology, physiology, and the nature of drug mechanisms, the better that you will understand the basis of these things. The education is out there, for anyone who wants to get it. Because of these side effects, it is the conventional practice in medicine for the benefits of taking a drug to be weighed against its adverse effects, and if you look at any therapeutic manual, you will see indications and contraindications for using any treatment. I am beginning to repeat myself, but for anyone who wants to state that modern medicine is not a pure panacea, I have no arguement with that. But if you are frightened by the list of known side effects and safety issues with studied, licensed and regulated compounds, why on earth would you not be more frightened by the unidentified side effects and safety risks of dietary supplements? I will repeat, there is no requirement to prove safety or efficacy of such compounds, and once they enter the marketplace, there is also no requirement to monitor or report side effects or safety issues. Here is a link to an FDA overview of dietary supplements. If you think things like - well it must be safe or they couldn't sell it, or it must work or they couldn't sell it -. guess again. http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/ds-oview.html
|
|
|
|