Viper001
Posts: 55
Joined: 8/8/2005 From: SF, California Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: KatyLied When did the lifestyle become an excuse not to live as a *real* person? The lifestyle does not define me in my entirety. I am many things...sub, mom, daughter, sister, employee, responsible adult. Can people live without living for the lifestyle? It seems to me that many are not capable of this. Yes, the lifestyle is important to me, but I also like being *real*, not living every moment for the lifestyle. Comments? Reactions? There is another way of viewing this. Some of us don't just live for the lifestyle. Who we are, as defined by the "lifestyle", influences our lives in many aspects regardless of whether we want it to or not. I'm confused as to why this makes us less *real*. I can't speak for others, but have long known that we (my wife and I) tend to gravitate to, and attract, friends with similar "lifestyle" interests. But these same friends will join us in a trip to Disneyland, the beach, dinner/dancing, etc., just for chits and giggles. Conversely, the base PE dynamic prevails, even during such a trip. It's not intentional. It just is. Thought #2: for those of us in 24/7 TPE relationships, the dynamic is primarily between the partners - and it's not always something we can turn on/off at will, sometimes it's just a natural part of who we are in the relationship. In most other aspects of our daily lives, especially with others, we are just as "real" as anyone else. Thought #3: you might be very correct. Some of us (raises hand) are not capable of sustaining a relationship without *some* element of BD/SM involved. My wife's most frequent request: <May i please go "home" for a while? I'm feeling lost and need to serve.> Translation - we need to get away from the kids for a while so i can be myself, your slave, or i'll go nuts. Makes one wonder which is the "real" person. The wife, the mother, or the submissive/slave. Respectfully, RFJM <who blames the Vicodin if this post seems somewhat incoherent, hehe>
|