TeacherNStudent
Posts: 22
Joined: 3/1/2006 Status: offline
|
The idea that we wouldn't have civilization or technology if men didn't make them is an amusing one, and very likely, a false one. It ignores the fact that women have better manual dexterity than men on the average, it ignores every culture where the men sit on their rumps while the women do the hard labor (mostly African cultures), and it implies that every woman scientist, engineer, doctor, judge, et cetera, has a man at home who really does all her thinking for her so she can look good by presenting his thoughts as hers. (Obviously, the Clintons had it backwards.) Let's not make the mistake of assuming that our personal sexual practices actually reflect a fact of nature regarding male "superiority" and female "inferiority". It's fun in bed, it's fun as a lifestyle, but it doesn't mean a thing in the greater scheme of things. If women haven't made as many contributions as men have, it's because for millenia, they had to battle for the priviledge of even competing against men. Rather than speculating that there would have been no civilization if men hadn't built it, let's instead speculate what heights we might have reached if we hadn't thrown away half of our best minds for a few thousand years because their genitals were innies instead of outies.
|