Zensee
Posts: 1564
Joined: 9/4/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: seeksfemslave Is it not true Zensee that throughout the ages, philosophical, polititical, analytical, literary and poetic creative thinking, especially with regard to the organisation of society , has mostly been the province of men ? Though there was opposition to women doing such things, so there was to men, depending on the point of view they expressed. The sexes are complementary, not equal. All the achievements you list are the results civilisation or culture, not it's cause and, given the opportunity to participate, women are every bit as capable as men in their creation. The opposition to women's participation is not of the same nature or on the same scale as the internal squabbles within philisophies or disclipines. Women were not excluded because their views were heretical but because their views were simply ignored as invalid. The founding behaviours of culture are responses to the need of female humans to form and maintain cohesive social groups that can preserve, refine and distribute knowledge. A man's minimum contribution to reproduction is measured in minutes - the woman's in years. Who has the greater motive to form complex societies? Who has the greater need to share and preserve knowledge? Women do. Being raised with culture, men are full participants and have an inate understanding of the mechanisms. Not being capable of bearing children themselves, men have a clear motive to control both the mechanisms of culture and women as a group. Being larger, more agressive and less empathetic, they have the means and nature to take and keep that control. But just because they hog the remote doesn't mean they make better choices than women. Opportunity NOT capability. In complimentary pairs neither is superior to the other. 0
_____________________________
"Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water." (proverb)
|