mistoferin
Posts: 8284
Joined: 10/27/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NastyDaddy quote:
ORIGINAL: mistoferin FYI....I wasn't juding any relationship decisions of any Master....his decisions regarding her are their business not mine. <--- my point exactly I asked the question because I wanted to know how many others feel this same way. I'm sorry if you think that I "juiced" it up in order to sway the responses. I had a conversation with a friend. I stated the gist of the conversation. I stated my surprise at the conversation. No "juicing". Did something I said strike a nerve or something? On the contrary, you demonstrated my point well. The question you asked was in reference to that particular master's decision... quote:
There is an upcoming DM class being offered in my area. I called a friend of mine who is a slave to tell her about it, thinking she may be interested. She is a very level headed and calm person who has many active years in the lifestyle. She is also a nurse which I thought would be a bonus. I think she would make a great DM. <---- your position/opinion intro I was rather surprised though, when she said that her Master wouldn't allow her to take the class because he feels that only Master's can be DM's....and even more surprised to hear that he thinks only MALE Master's can. Any thoughts??? <---- your question is NOT based on HIM? Yeah, you "juiced" it alright... and you did good... and you also sucked em' all into it... that's the funniest part. (and big kudos to those posters who didn't attack the knuckle dragger master for you, lol) The whole question was based against his decisions and your supplied rationale for his decision.... which very coincidentally did not coincide with your preconceived decision... oopsies, just an amazing coincidence, totally innocent/inquisitive only.... yeah. You spelled out the answer and then asked the question... call it "juicing", call it stacking the jury, call it whatever you want.... it's your innocent "right until proven right" toy, LOL. Who's nerve got struck here mistoferin... it was obvious to me before in the OP, and now doubly obvious... If you notice closely, I've not answered to the OP's DM thoughts... it's a loaded trick question to prove you are right.... your thread is political to your conversation moreso than to the objective situation based DM gender/role subject. It's very personally biased in order to prove you right and the master wrong on HIS decision and thinking... so again, shame on you. I wouldn't go as far as to call it remote topping from the bottom... but it's kinda the same "juice". As I said before, why not merely pose the subject verses the situation you obviously disagreed so much with? I really should not even justify this with a response. I would suggest to you that in the future, before you spout off about what my intentions and thoughts are, you may wish to take your crystal ball in for service there Kreskin because you are far off the mark. You know what they say about when one assumes......
_____________________________
Peace and light, ~erin~ There are no victims here...only volunteers. When you make a habit of playing on the tracks, you thereby forfeit the right to bitch when you get hit by a train. "I did it! I admit it and I'm gonna do it again!"
|