RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message

FangsNfeet -> RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" (9/29/2006 11:14:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LordODiscipline

So then you are omnipotent and infallible as originally supposed.
 
Excellent gig!
 
(Just do not let them get you near a tree while they are holding hammer and nails)
 
~J


Nobody is perfect. I'm just incontroll of myself and my pet.



LordODiscipline -> RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" (9/30/2006 2:37:06 AM)

Then....
 
And, I am a bit confused here -
 
You DO occasionally lose control?
 
There may be stresses in your life which (on exceedingly rare occasion) could place you in a position where you are peeved and speak rashly or where you might type something intemperately simply because it is a momentary glitch in the cool of the long night?
 
~J



ClassAct2006 -> RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" (9/30/2006 3:38:30 AM)

I wouldn't want to go out with a dominant man who lost his temper all the time, for example or couldn't control his drinking. If I am principally seeking control then I need someone who likes and is good at control of himself and others. That is not to say dominant men never do lose control but the more attractive ones have things sorted out in terms of work, life, their ability to handle relationships and of course submissive women.



CreativeDominant -> RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" (9/30/2006 1:00:34 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sinergy

quote:

ORIGINAL: LordODiscipline

Being angry, sad, pissy, or exhuberant is not an absolute indication of someone losing control... simply of their emotional state at the time....(or, they may be being manipulative)
 



Hello A/all,

This is exactly true.

Screaming at the person serving your food in a restaurant because they brought you Manhattan Clam Chowder instead of New England Clam Chowder.  Beating somebody to a bloody pulp because they cut you off in traffic.  Or my personal favorite which one of my co-workers told me today:

She went over to her soon to be ex-husband's house.  They got into a screaming match.  He walked away when she tried to slap him.

So she got into her car and drove it into the side of his new truck, smashing the front end of her car (I saw it) and probably enough damage to total the truck.

Then she screamed where she was working and drove off.

Felony hit and run.

These are examples of losing control.  It is not what you feel that determines loss of control.  It is what you DO with those feelings
that matters.

Just me, could be wrong, etc.

Sinergy



I totally agree.  And probably said a lot more succinctly than my earlier post did.



velvetears -> RE: 'In Control of Oneself' to Be a "Dominant" (9/30/2006 6:02:58 PM)

It's not practical to expect anyone to be "in complete control" at all times.  Being human is being subject to a wide range of human emotions and experiences which are counterproductive to retaining control at all times. 

That being said - they do say that sociopaths and psychotics live life this way - they seek pathological ways to go about living but emotions and conscience makes living life "in control" much easier for them.   



Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.015625