CrappyDom
Posts: 1883
Joined: 4/11/2006 From: Sacramento Status: offline
|
Rich, I blamed Clinton for going to soft on China but in hindsight, I think that his move was clever and in the long run brought china to a safer, more stable point with greatly reduced militaristic tendencies. So I actually think MORE of Clinton now than I did then. As for his "failures" with Osama, you can believe all the right wing talking points you want but it is all smoke and mirrors designed to fool ignorant morons. Neither Clinton nor Bush have much in the way of the ability to stop N. Korea. Bush abandoned Clinton's approach and didn't do any better. Again, empty right wing talking points that fall apart if you actually look at them. As for Osama, you can believe that the Sudan handed him to Clinton on a platter all you want, the reality is clearly otherwise for anyone who reads people other than Anne Coulter. If Osama was such a clear threat, one we should have pulled all the stops out to go after, show me the Republican outrage AT THE FUCKING TIME over Clinton not getting Osama? You can't because the Republicans didn't care then, they didn't care under Bush and it seems they still don't fucking care. Well on second thought, maybe Bush was brilliant and his plan consisted of luring Osama into the open by lulling him into a false sense of security. Bush cut anti-terrror funding, demoted the anti-terror cabinet position, told the FBI to back off Saudi's, sent millions to the Taliban, ignored every warning that America was about to be attacked all in an effort to "trap" Osama. Does that sound better Rich? I am sure it does and if you are able to choke that sort of crap down, fine, just don't ask intelligent people to do the same.
|