RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


LadyEllen -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/1/2006 6:27:39 PM)

Fergus - well said. Something I said on an old thread about some pics from the Hubble telescope that turned into a debate of science vs religion, but was mainly ignored! I hope your post isnt ignored as its so true and so important.

I dont need to prove my God, and it really doesnt matter if someone tries to (even maybe succeeds, though I dont think thats possible) disprove my God. Its not a matter of proof - its a matter of the system I use, in your words, to understand and connect with the human experience. Science is important too, but it only tells me what and how, and never why?

E




fergus -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/1/2006 6:40:18 PM)

Lady Ellen,

Thanks! (lovely pic BTW) ... anyway, I agree! Science IS VERY important!  Just that Science is a poor replacement for faith, and faith is a poor replacement for science.  We do desperately need both.

fergus




anthrosub -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/1/2006 7:12:21 PM)

I know it's only been a few hours since I started this thread but so far, everything everyone has said is addressed in this book; such is it's thoroughness in addressing the arguments everyone inevitably brings to bear.  That's the beauty of it and why I said in the beginning you need to read this book regardless of your position.
 
anthrosub




popeye1250 -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/1/2006 9:01:30 PM)

I believe in God not in religion (s)
I don't like the dogma in religions.
And they're certainly not neccessary to believe in God.
Does anyone think God wants to hear billions of prayers everyday?
Those muslims must REALLY piss him off at it 5 times a day! Why don't they just make it 10 times a day?
To my way of thinking God made human beings to entertain himself, and I think we're doing a pretty good job of it.
I wonder if there's a "Mrs. God?"




meatcleaver -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/1/2006 10:46:16 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

MC - that depends on whether one believes in the Biblical God, I'd say?



If god is omnipotent, then god is capable of removing the inherent cruelty of the universes design and if god doesn't, biblical god or no, god is still a cruel, malicious, vindictive joker. If god isn't omnipotent and has to design the universe according to specific rules, what god created that god?




Lorelei115 -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/1/2006 11:10:29 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

MC - that depends on whether one believes in the Biblical God, I'd say?



If god is omnipotent, then god is capable of removing the inherent cruelty of the universes design and if god doesn't, biblical god or no, god is still a cruel, malicious, vindictive joker. If god isn't omnipotent and has to design the universe according to specific rules, what god created that god?


Ugh. I hate going into this at 2 am but Im going to give it my best shot.

If God were to remove all the bad, negative things from the universe, how would we know how to recognize good when we see it? To know light, we have to know what darkness is. There is also the most beautiful and troublesome gift that God gave us. Free will. Free will means that God CANNOT interfere with the way we choose to run ourselves and our world. If He were to change what we do to fit a perception of what is "good" how would we ever learn what true goodness is?
To my mind, all the cruelties of the world are not made by God, or an equivilant force of darkness (Satan, the Devil, etc), but by man himself. I don't see God as a cruel, malicious vindictive joker. I see Him as a parent, forcing himself to step back and let His children make their own mistakes and learn their own way in the world, no matter how much it hurts Him to see us be so cruel to ourselves, others, and the planet who's care we were entrusted with.

Please note that I use "God" in a universal sense here, not neccessarily the Christian Bible version. I myself have issues with the Bible, but I will not go into them here, nor do I allow it to affect my belief in a higher spiritual power.




meatcleaver -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/2/2006 12:13:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorelei115

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

MC - that depends on whether one believes in the Biblical God, I'd say?



If god is omnipotent, then god is capable of removing the inherent cruelty of the universes design and if god doesn't, biblical god or no, god is still a cruel, malicious, vindictive joker. If god isn't omnipotent and has to design the universe according to specific rules, what god created that god?


Ugh. I hate going into this at 2 am but Im going to give it my best shot.

If God were to remove all the bad, negative things from the universe, how would we know how to recognize good when we see it? To know light, we have to know what darkness is. There is also the most beautiful and troublesome gift that God gave us. Free will. Free will means that God CANNOT interfere with the way we choose to run ourselves and our world. If He were to change what we do to fit a perception of what is "good" how would we ever learn what true goodness is?
To my mind, all the cruelties of the world are not made by God, or an equivilant force of darkness (Satan, the Devil, etc), but by man himself. I don't see God as a cruel, malicious vindictive joker. I see Him as a parent, forcing himself to step back and let His children make their own mistakes and learn their own way in the world, no matter how much it hurts Him to see us be so cruel to ourselves, others, and the planet who's care we were entrusted with.

Please note that I use "God" in a universal sense here, not neccessarily the Christian Bible version. I myself have issues with the Bible, but I will not go into them here, nor do I allow it to affect my belief in a higher spiritual power.


Let me counter. We see and sense only what we are designed to see and sense, which is not very much. God has effectively given us a blindman's stick and sent out into  the unknown. It is not beyond an omnipotent god to bestow wisdom, knowledge and resources on those creatures god creates and why would one need to experience negative things in a universe full of abundance and good, wisdom is all one needs? God created the universe, he created the bad things too which he didn't have to create and if he didn't, there wouldn't be any need to learn about them because they wouldn't exist.

Who designed an earth with earthquakes, floods, plagues, famine, where creatures have to devour each other in order to survive, President Bush? Some parent, god sounds rather like Saturn devouring his children. And why would a god make beings that are all too aware of their own demize, that seems rather cruel to me or have Islamists got it right, die for god and go to heaven?

What sort of petty god requires worship? It must all be rather boring. Actually, it is probably why he created the universe, to keep himself entertained in eternity and an infinite universe with no one to talk to let alone any equal to share the emptiness of what must be god's existence. We are obviously the frivilous joke he amuses himself with.




LadyEllen -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/2/2006 2:34:14 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

MC - that depends on whether one believes in the Biblical God, I'd say?



If god is omnipotent, then god is capable of removing the inherent cruelty of the universes design and if god doesn't, biblical god or no, god is still a cruel, malicious, vindictive joker. If god isn't omnipotent and has to design the universe according to specific rules, what god created that god?


Ah. but my God is omnipotent and has already removed the cruelty - its only us which perceive all the cosmos existing in time, who trap ourselves in the cosmos at some halfway point to the end. No God created my God - something went awry with the natural cosmos, and my God arose from that, but gained knowledge of how things ought to be and mastery over the problem to put things right. Its very different to the Judeo-Christian model that always informs these debates, which is the point I'm making really, and yet just as valid by any test one could mention.
E




Lorelei115 -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/2/2006 8:05:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorelei115
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen

MC - that depends on whether one believes in the Biblical God, I'd say?



If god is omnipotent, then god is capable of removing the inherent cruelty of the universes design and if god doesn't, biblical god or no, god is still a cruel, malicious, vindictive joker. If god isn't omnipotent and has to design the universe according to specific rules, what god created that god?


Ugh. I hate going into this at 2 am but Im going to give it my best shot.

If God were to remove all the bad, negative things from the universe, how would we know how to recognize good when we see it? To know light, we have to know what darkness is. There is also the most beautiful and troublesome gift that God gave us. Free will. Free will means that God CANNOT interfere with the way we choose to run ourselves and our world. If He were to change what we do to fit a perception of what is "good" how would we ever learn what true goodness is?
To my mind, all the cruelties of the world are not made by God, or an equivilant force of darkness (Satan, the Devil, etc), but by man himself. I don't see God as a cruel, malicious vindictive joker. I see Him as a parent, forcing himself to step back and let His children make their own mistakes and learn their own way in the world, no matter how much it hurts Him to see us be so cruel to ourselves, others, and the planet who's care we were entrusted with.

Please note that I use "God" in a universal sense here, not neccessarily the Christian Bible version. I myself have issues with the Bible, but I will not go into them here, nor do I allow it to affect my belief in a higher spiritual power.


Let me counter. We see and sense only what we are designed to see and sense, which is not very much. God has effectively given us a blindman's stick and sent out into the unknown. It is not beyond an omnipotent god to bestow wisdom, knowledge and resources on those creatures god creates and why would one need to experience negative things in a universe full of abundance and good, wisdom is all one needs? God created the universe, he created the bad things too which he didn't have to create and if he didn't, there wouldn't be any need to learn about them because they wouldn't exist.

Who designed an earth with earthquakes, floods, plagues, famine, where creatures have to devour each other in order to survive, President Bush? Some parent, god sounds rather like Saturn devouring his children. And why would a god make beings that are all too aware of their own demize, that seems rather cruel to me or have Islamists got it right, die for god and go to heaven?

What sort of petty god requires worship? It must all be rather boring. Actually, it is probably why he created the universe, to keep himself entertained in eternity and an infinite universe with no one to talk to let alone any equal to share the emptiness of what must be god's existence. We are obviously the frivilous joke he amuses himself with.


Well, as I said, I think one does need to experience the negative in order to be able to recognize good when one experiences that. To me, life is about learning. God sent us here, basically deaf and blind as you say, in order to experience the hardships as well as the good.
Its like if you had never seen the color blue, how could someone explain it to you? They can't, you have to experience it for yourself. If we lived in a world where nothing ever died, and everything was like a happy la-la land, how could we possibly learn anything?

Also... I don't think God demands worship. I think that is a human invention. I think God has given us a deep desire to communicate with Him, and I think that some people have misinterpereted that as a desire to be worshipped. That is one of the reasons I don't follow an organized religion.

I completely understand where you are coming from, I used to feel the same way. I was SO angry that God would let people suffer and not do anything about it. And I got so tired of when I asked why God would let this person die a painful death of cancer, or let these people die of starvation, I was simply told that God works in mysterious ways and we are not meant to understand His higher plan.

But I don't think the knowledge of our own demise is neccessarily cruel. The fear that comes from knowing that we are going to die is nothing more than our animal survival instinct kicking in. I think that it is meant to help us focus in the here and now. If we all thought we were going to live forever, what would be the point in getting anything done today? Without a deadline of some sort, things often don't get accomplished. A lot of the absolute terror that comes from knowing we are going to die is just our animal instinct kicking in. If one can think their way past that, death becomes nothing more than the final mystery, so to speak. One of my favorite quotes about death comes from the Neil Gaiman series, The Sandman. In it, an old man has just died, and the anthropomorphic personification of Death comes to collect his soul. He says to her, "I must confess, young lady, I have always wondered what lay beyond life, my dear." She answers "Yeah, everybody wonders. And sooner or later, everyone gets to find out."

The point is, we can't know. Until we die, everything that we say or do or feel about God cannot be proven. The only thing I can know about good and evil in the world is what my internal moral compass tells me. All the discussion and debate on the nature of God in the world will not prove or disprove a certain theory. I see the so called "cruelty" of the world as things that we must take lessons from. You take it as evidence of a cruel creator. Until we die, neither of us can be proved right, so, I choose to believe in my point of view. If I am proved wrong when I die, at least I will have the satisfaction of knowing that I lived my life on Earth to the best of my ability with the tools that I was given. Really, what else can anyone do?








meatcleaver -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/2/2006 8:21:59 AM)

Lorelei115 wrote:

Its like if you had never seen the color blue, how could someone explain it to you? They can't, you have to experience it for yourself. If we lived in a world where nothing ever died, and everything was like a happy la-la land, how could we possibly learn anything?

If god is omnipotent one would expect he could do a pretty good job of giving us a sense of blue.

And as for happy la-la land, isn't that what heaven is supposed to be about? Why create this hell hole in the first place?




Lorelei115 -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/2/2006 8:47:54 AM)

If god is omnipotent one would expect he could do a pretty good job of giving us a sense of blue.

Well... He is, isn't He?

And as for happy la-la land, isn't that what heaven is supposed to be about? Why create this hell hole in the first place?

Well... first off I don't believe in heaven in a Christian or other organized religion's sense. A lot of the time, I think organized religions use the concept of "Heaven" as a carrot to dangle in front of their members to contrast with the concept of "Hell" which is the stick they use to beat them into line. Figuratively speaking of course. In a lot of organized religions, "Heaven" seems to be some kind of super exclusive members only club that the people of the religion use to make themselves feel special. ie- "I'm going to Heaven 'cause I'm baptized into such and such faith, but you're not, so I'm better than you."

So what happens when we die? Dunno! Can't know! Like I said above, none of us will know until we die. All we can do until then is to live by what our conciences tell us is "right".







Rule -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/2/2006 10:50:18 AM)

I have read the wikipedia article. It is my impression that Harris is a fool.
 
I approve of the posts of those of the female gender - and of those of fergus if fergus is not - in this thread so far. Well done. You are spiritually aware.
 
As for me: in the thread that LadyEllen referred to, I created the universe - as well as myself and the other gods; Satan among them. Without Satan and the others I could not have done it.
 
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorelei115
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
It is not beyond an omnipotent god to bestow wisdom, knowledge and resources on those creatures god creates



Actually it is. There is only so much of the stuff to go around. Besides, the Creator had to distribute unequally, otherwise everything would be identical and existence by definition would not be possible. If the Creator had created a universe consisting of googol kazillions of green peas only, there would be no green peas. Nobody would point at a pea and say "look, it is a green pea". It is only possible to distinguish a green pea if there are also peas of another color, even if only one. So some people are wise and most others are not.
 
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorelei115
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
and why would one need to experience negative things in a universe full of abundance and good, wisdom is all one needs? God created the universe, he created the bad things too which he didn't have to create and if he didn't, there wouldn't be any need to learn about them because they wouldn't exist.



Are you into philosophy? You sound like one of them.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorelei115
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
Who designed an earth with earthquakes, floods, plagues, famine, where creatures have to devour each other in order to survive, President Bush? Some parent, god sounds rather like Saturn devouring his children.



The Creator did.
Well, all this devouring has purpose, as well as theological implications. Rejoice.
 
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorelei115
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

And why would a god make beings that are all too aware of their own demize, that seems rather cruel to me or have Islamists got it right, die for god and go to heaven?


Lorelei115 answered that question already. We are all born with a purpose. Better find it and get on with it, because time is limited.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorelei115
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
What sort of petty god requires worship? It must all be rather boring. Actually, it is probably why he created the universe, to keep himself entertained in eternity and an infinite universe with no one to talk to let alone any equal to share the emptiness of what must be god's existence. We are obviously the frivilous joke he amuses himself with.


The Creator does not require worship. He provided mankind with free will, after all. Anyone can choose not to worship the Creator. (It is nice if people do, though.) However, the Creator is not the only god. There are others, and some of them do require worship. Fortunately man has free will...




LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/2/2006 12:06:02 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorelei115
To know light, we have to know what darkness is.

Not true- I see biohazard signs on things and I avoid them.  We're a bit smarter than that.  I think the notion that you HAVE to endure suffering to know true happiness is false.


quote:

 Free will means that God CANNOT interfere with the way we choose to run ourselves and our world. If He were to change what we do to fit a perception of what is "good" how would we ever learn what true goodness is?

If you believe the Christian god and their stories, their god has interefered TONS of times- the floods, talking to his disciples, sending his son to convince other people to believe, and every miracle is a direct act of god influence the people of the earth.

That whole putting his child into Mary without her consent seems pretty bad, and absolutely interfering with her "free will"

Not to mention the whole concept of prayer- what's the point of praying to god if god CANNOT interfere with what we do and how we do it?  Once you've accepted god- the only reason to communicate with him after that is to forgive when you've committed a sin. 

And I'll point out the obvious that if you are saying god CANNOT do something, you're saying god is NOT omnipotent.

You claim you don't believe in the christian sense of god- so why on earth do you think "free will" is necessary and that god can't interfere with it?  That's a fairly christian idea of god.




NakedOnMyChain -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/2/2006 12:15:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
If god is omnipotent one would expect he could do a pretty good job of giving us a sense of blue.

And as for happy la-la land, isn't that what heaven is supposed to be about? Why create this hell hole in the first place?


I've had this same specific argument, from both sides, in nearly the same words about a dozen times with random people in the past.  The big thing I've noticed about it is that the person who makes the above statements tends to be pretty severely depressed.  There are exceptions, but just in case, how are you doing meatcleaver?  You don't sound too happy with life.




Marc2b -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/2/2006 4:55:36 PM)

Lucky Albatross said:

quote:

I'll just point out that one CAN be both a creationist and believe in evolution.  I know most people find that confusing and aren't both, but it is certainly possible.


Amen.  So to speak.


My religion is very simple:  I believe there is a creator (because I don't how there couldn't be a creator), after that I haven't a clue.  I always liked what J. Michale Straczynski said:  "science and faith are like the shoes on your feet, you'll get further with both than just one."

The book does sound interesting, though.  I may order it from Amazon. 




Foxer55 -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/2/2006 5:11:23 PM)

Anthrosub,

quote:

I hope and look forward to some of you reading the book...and then start posting your take on your currently held faith, ideas, and beliefs.  The wiki is not even the tip of the iceberg.  Right now you're not speaking from the experience of having read it, so nothing is really different if you get my meaning.

 
I'm really a lot, lot more concerned about people who adhere to the Quran.
 
Foxer




mnottertail -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/2/2006 5:26:58 PM)

I find it rude and rather non-consensual that people would parade 'christianity' on a site that is supposed to be about tolerance--- knowing that there is a large contingent out here that either don't give a fuck or is of different perspective such as me and myu belief in Norse religion......and furthermore parade this as something that could be considered mainstream.........


By the One-Eyed, I am Disgusted!!!!
Braga










anthrosub -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/2/2006 7:20:18 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Foxer55

Anthrosub,

quote:

I hope and look forward to some of you reading the book...and then start posting your take on your currently held faith, ideas, and beliefs.  The wiki is not even the tip of the iceberg.  Right now you're not speaking from the experience of having read it, so nothing is really different if you get my meaning.

 
I'm really a lot, lot more concerned about people who adhere to the Quran.
 
Foxer


Me too...and if you check out the book beyond what the Wiki tells about it, you will see why.  Actually, his first book is the better read on that subject (I'm reading it now).  His second book is essentially a reply to all the people who insist on maintaining their beliefs in spite of the obvious (which is also dealt with more deeply in the first book).
 
What generally happens when this subject is raised is everyone gets caught up in debating the differences between their personal views (which you can see going on here right now).  He steps away from all that muddle and talks about the big picture.  If people can't do that (or refuse to), then they suffer not seeing the forest for the trees.

anthrosub




Lorelei115 -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/2/2006 7:21:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorelei115
To know light, we have to know what darkness is.

Not true- I see biohazard signs on things and I avoid them. We're a bit smarter than that. I think the notion that you HAVE to endure suffering to know true happiness is false.
Without valleys there are no hills. It has always been my observation that people don't know how good they have it until everything is taken away.


quote:

Free will means that God CANNOT interfere with the way we choose to run ourselves and our world. If He were to change what we do to fit a perception of what is "good" how would we ever learn what true goodness is?



If you believe the Christian god and their stories, their god has interefered TONS of times- the floods, talking to his disciples, sending his son to convince other people to believe, and every miracle is a direct act of god influence the people of the earth.

That whole putting his child into Mary without her consent seems pretty bad, and absolutely interfering with her "free will"

I already said I don't agree with the Christian view of God.

Not to mention the whole concept of prayer- what's the point of praying to god if god CANNOT interfere with what we do and how we do it? Once you've accepted god- the only reason to communicate with him after that is to forgive when you've committed a sin.
I never said anything about prayer. There are lots of reasons to talk to God even if He can't change things.

And I'll point out the obvious that if you are saying god CANNOT do something, you're saying god is NOT omnipotent.

You claim you don't believe in the christian sense of god- so why on earth do you think "free will" is necessary and that god can't interfere with it? That's a fairly christian idea of god.

When I say "cannot" I don't mean not capable. I just mean it would be voiding the whole idea of our free will. And, no I don't think free will is just a Christian concept. Considering as not a paragraph above, you say the Christian God is NOT about free will, why do you say it is now?










LuckyAlbatross -> RE: Letter to a Christian Nation (11/2/2006 8:41:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lorelei115
Without valleys there are no hills. It has always been my observation that people don't know how good they have it until everything is taken away.

And I think that's BS- my nephews don't need to have their mother and father killed by plague in order to know how happy they had it with their parents alive.

How "much" suffering must one endure?  Why do some people endure horrific tragedies that have NOTHING to do with their choices/free will?

quote:


I never said anything about prayer. There are lots of reasons to talk to God even if He can't change things.

Such as?  If god refuses to interfere on any direct level, it won't change anything.

quote:

When I say "cannot" I don't mean not capable. I just mean it would be voiding the whole idea of our free will. And, no I don't think free will is just a Christian concept. Considering as not a paragraph above, you say the Christian God is NOT about free will, why do you say it is now?

I said that the christian god has OFTEN negated the concept of free will, and in fact does so on a regular basis with every disease and natural disaster and miracle that occurs.

I will ask you again- WHY do you think the concept of "free will" exists and what purposes does it serve?  Why do you think we need it?  Why do you think a person needs to suffer in order to know happiness?









Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875