SubNY278
Posts: 50
Joined: 2/6/2006 Status: offline
|
It's incredible how blinded by patriotic rhetoric you are. First, if anything, there was an outcry against conservative blowhards like Rush Limbaugh coming out and accusing Fox of "faking" his own disease. Lest we forget Rush's own issues with drugs and medication. But I guess that's ok, because he supports Bush and is thus a good American. Second, I don't think Kerry changed anyone's minds about the war or whether or not to vote for a Democratic candidate. It seems that on an issue as polarized as Iraq, people at this point pretty much have their minds made up already. I think it's telling that support for the Iraq invasion is dropping each and every month, and last month was the deadliest month for American troops in close to two years. We may support our troops in that we don't want them to get hurt or killed or to be in harm's way, but that doesn't equate to supporting an illegal, unjustified invasion. 3. It amazes me that conservatives forget that the "mass murdering dictator" was a good "friend" of America under Reagan. In fact, Rumsfeld even travelled to Baghdad personally to meet with him, and we sold him plenty of weapons to fight our other "enemies" in Iran. I guess an enemy of an enemy is a friend, but only when it's convenient for us. Those weapons he killed Kurds with? Made in America. Also, please provide us evidence for your statements below: "Democrats lied when they said that Saddam had no WMD; Dems lied when they said that Saddam was not trying to build an atom bomb; Dems lied when they said that Saddam did not support international terrorism, and Dems lied when they said that Iraq was not a terrorist haven." a) Where's the WMDs? Close to four years in Iraq now and they still haven't been found. And I don't think anyone is expecting to find them anymore, because he didn't have any! b) Show us evidence as to Saddam trying to build an atom bomb. The uranium from Niger story was refuted years ago. But it seems you're still stuck in the past, so I'll give you a pass on it. Or, actually not, because people like you who are so brainwashed and uneducated scare me. c) No, Saddam did not support international terrorism. Show us an example of him working with a group like Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda were actually *enemies* of Saddam, because Saddam did not impose an Islamic theocracy in Iraq. Doesn't make Saddam an angel, but doesn't make him a terrorist sympathizer either. Iraq was a secular nation under his rule, for better or for worse. I don't know if that's going to end up being the case now that America got involved... d) No, Dems did not lie and Iraq was not a terrorist haven. Iraq is *now* a terrorist haven. Care to guess why? Because now, terrorists have a cause to rally around, and that's our invasion of a sovereign Muslim nation. I suggest you start following the news from an outlet other than Fox News, perhaps it might help you expand your horizons a bit. If you need any help understanding any of this, just let me know and I'll explain it again to you nice and slow so you can get it.
|