Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: AS AMERICANS WHERE DO /SHOULD WE STAND?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: AS AMERICANS WHERE DO /SHOULD WE STAND? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: AS AMERICANS WHERE DO /SHOULD WE STAND? - 12/1/2006 7:40:55 PM   
Emperor1956


Posts: 2370
Joined: 11/7/2005
Status: offline
quote:

LadyEllen:  The word Hooligan is derived from a derogatory English term for Irish people - I take it from the name thats pronounced Hoolahann (but probably spelt Gdskpaljuie in that bizarre Irish spelling system they have).


Its Irish.  A language.  One of the Celtic languages (Gaelic is another).  It is a language of the peoples (Celts, Welsh, Irish and Scots) who gave the pathetic little southern isle of England you live on its culture, heart, and intelligence.  Without them (and the Romans, the Vikings, and the French) you would be nothing but a pathetic blue-painted pre-historic tribe.

Ok...that was an exaggeration, but JEEZE it felt good.

E.

_____________________________

"When you wake up, Pooh," said Piglet, "what's the first thing you say?"
"What's for breakfast? What do you say, Piglet?"
"I say, I wonder what's going to happen exciting today?"
Pooh nodded thoughtfully.
"It's the same thing," he said.

(in reply to LadyEllen)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: AS AMERICANS WHERE DO /SHOULD WE STAND? - 12/1/2006 9:05:34 PM   
FangsNfeet


Posts: 3758
Joined: 12/3/2004
Status: offline
Oh shit. You've done it now. Sheite has hit the fan.

_____________________________

I'm Godzilla and you're Japan

(in reply to MistressSophia)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: AS AMERICANS WHERE DO /SHOULD WE STAND? - 12/1/2006 10:27:26 PM   
Zensee


Posts: 1564
Joined: 9/4/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Emperor1956

Its Irish.  A language.  One of the Celtic languages (Gaelic is another).  It is a language of the peoples (Celts, Welsh, Irish and Scots) who gave the pathetic little southern isle of England you live on its culture, heart, and intelligence.  Without them (and the Romans, the Vikings, and the French) you would be nothing but a pathetic blue-painted pre-historic tribe.



Regardless of all that, we would still be ENGLISH!
You, on the other hand, would NOT.


_____________________________

"Before enlightenment, chop wood and carry water. After enlightenment, chop wood and carry water." (proverb)

(in reply to Emperor1956)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: AS AMERICANS WHERE DO /SHOULD WE STAND? - 12/2/2006 5:03:55 AM   
LadyEllen


Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006
From: Stourport-England
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Emperor1956

quote:

LadyEllen:  The word Hooligan is derived from a derogatory English term for Irish people - I take it from the name thats pronounced Hoolahann (but probably spelt Gdskpaljuie in that bizarre Irish spelling system they have).


Its Irish.  A language.  One of the Celtic languages (Gaelic is another).  It is a language of the peoples (Celts, Welsh, Irish and Scots) who gave the pathetic little southern isle of England you live on its culture, heart, and intelligence.  Without them (and the Romans, the Vikings, and the French) you would be nothing but a pathetic blue-painted pre-historic tribe.

Ok...that was an exaggeration, but JEEZE it felt good.

E.


Thats it!

Handbags at dawn it is. My second shall call upon you Feb 30th at 7am.

Nah, dont worry. My neighbour Adrian is mixed Welsh/Irish and I push his buttons on it all the time - about how these "Celtic" types are all mouth and no trousers. I mean, they must be superior right? They wouldnt have been pushed to the barren extremities of Britain and enslaved otherwise, surely?

Mind you, they do have a great fighting spirit - no doubt there. I reckon we built our empire on it, all in all. But they couldnt have built their own empire alone - too damned drunk all the while, (ask the Romans on that one), and their tendency to run about shouting a lot is very impressive but not as effective as a disciplined volley fire into said noisy mass. In short, the UK was and is what it is because together we're unbeatable.

As for the Anglo Saxon world - I believe if you look into the history, you will find it to have been rich enough in itself. Roman ways did not affect it - they scarpered and left the poor "Celts" to invite us in to defend them from the Picts, but we liked the look of the place and decided to stay.

from the Anglo Saxon Chronicle AD 449
And on hiera dagum Hengest and Horsa, fram Wyrtgeorne gelathode, Bretta cyninge, gesohton Bretene on thaem stede the is genemned Ypwines-fleot, aerest Brettum to fultume, ac hie eft on hie fuhton.
(And in these days, Hengest and Horsa, invited by the British king Vortigern, came to Britain in the place which is named Ebbsfleet, first to help the British, though later they fought against them.)

The Celts had been weakened by their soft Romanicised living, and apart from a few episodes, the whole thing was pretty much determined within a hundred years or so. A factor in the Anglo Saxon success was undoubtedly their swords - made the same as Samurai swords were, a thousand years later and capable of cutting a man in half - literally. One can hardly blame the Celts for running.

Now, the Vikings... the fact is that genetically and culturally they were not different to the Anglo Saxons, and back in the 5th century, the Anglo Saxons would have kicked their asses. However, the same reason the Celts were so weak, also weakened the Anglo Saxons - the vile infection known as Christianity, imposed by various means (mostly foul) on the Anglo Saxons. So when the Vikings arrived, the Anglo Saxons found themselves in the same position as the Celts had, and rather than slaughtering the invaders in true Odinic style, had the "turn the other cheek" thing going on instead.

Anyway, King Alfed eventually beat them back and agreed the Danelaw, whereby the north and east would be Viking and the south and west Saxon. If you find the A5 road on your map - the old Roman road, thats more or less the border and to this day, this is where the accent changes from Saxon to Norse.

And then, the Normans - who were actually Vikings and genetically not different to the Anglo Saxons and the Vikings in the Danelaw. Aside from the infusion of Celtic blood of course - but then that occurred on both sides anyway, as some of the British Celts fled the Anglo Saxons by embarking for what is Brittany in France, next door to Normandy, with whom they allied against those other Germanics the Franks.

Now, if you want to know who perpetrated all the abuse and persecution of the Celts, then you have to look to these Norman invaders and their descendants. The Anglo Saxons didnt do it, neither did the Vikings - it was the Norman kings and what followed from them which repressed the Celts in their lands, not we. We simply made an honourable war for land, and were happy to leave the Celts wherever they ran to.

And we didnt paint ourselves blue either; more of a pre-Roman Celtic thing that.

One last thing, which really makes me laugh. The word Welsh is from the old Anglo Saxon wealh, meaning foreigner/alien. That the Welsh have taken that description as their own is surely the ultimate sign of the superiority of Anglo Saxon culture.

E (the premier E of CM)



_____________________________

In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.

(in reply to Emperor1956)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: AS AMERICANS WHERE DO /SHOULD WE STAND? - 12/2/2006 5:26:36 AM   
untamedshysub


Posts: 220
Joined: 2/26/2005
Status: offline
There are two things people will never agree on religion and politics. Both are outside of our circle of influence and should be treated as such. Accept people for who they are allow them to believe who they belive in and the world will be a much calmer place. I told my pastor that one sunday when they were praying that all people come from adam and eve so how can you only pray for the ones you care about?  This is geared toward christians who seem to think they hold the red phone to God. Pisses me off royally I am a liberal christian I belive in God and I belive that other people have Gods that are just as imporant to them and I respect that. I learned that the hard way my daughter is a wiccan and bisexual. our relationship became strained and since I love my child I learned about things that were important to her and let go of some of my beliefs that have no foundation other than the teachings of man, told her I perfered her girlfriend to the boyfriend she had at the time and wished her a happy new year on halloween.
The point is we are all different and most of what you see, and read in the paper and news is bullshit slanted to the view of the writer. Watch the movie wag the dog , take the news with a grain of salt and pray for everyone who lives where they do not know if they will be alive in the next five seconds.

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 45
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: AS AMERICANS WHERE DO /SHOULD WE STAND? Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.059