Lordandmaster -> RE: NCAA Bowl Schedule (12/29/2006 10:15:20 AM)
|
I don't go for the "it was a tough stretch in the schedule" business. Oklahoma, since we're talking about them, had a stretch where they played FOUR road games in FIVE weeks, and they won all five games. (Two were against ranked opponents, namely Missouri and Texas A&M, and two others were against Texas Tech and Oklahoma State, which aren't patsies either.) But any way you slice it, Texas deserves a more meaningful bowl game. They're going to clobber Iowa. Iowa doesn't even deserve a bowl game at all. Oh, and yes, their win over Oklahoma was, in retrospect, the high-water mark of their season, but I'm pretty sure that if they played again right now, Oklahoma would win, even without Adrian Peterson. Of course, I've picked a lot of games wrong over the last week and a half... quote:
ORIGINAL: caitlyn A lot of that would depend on how healthy Colt McCoy and the Texas defensive backs are. Remember, when they were healthy Texas crushed Oklahoma, with Adrian Peterson, on a neutral field. Texas just fell prey to a worn down and battered team, that had too many tough road games in a short stretch. That game they lost to K-State was the third road game in four weeks, all against bowl team. They had to play it with a quaterback that hadn't taken a snap in a meaningful game, and two freshman defensive backs. All in all though, I think Texas got the bowl game they played themselves down to ... but on the flip side, the Alamo bowl is a pretty cool bowl game. San Antonio is a fun place.
|
|
|
|