UtopianRanger
Posts: 3251
Status: offline
|
quote:
No he hasn't. If Iran doesn't negotiate over its nuclear policy you can bet that if the USA doesn't destroy Iran's nuclear programme, Israel will, with tacit agreement of the USA. Israel might….but in light of Kim’s lighting /launching of his new firecrackers, Bush doesn’t have the political capital to attack Iran. If Kim lights off another {bigger} firecracker {and he’s planning to} and Bush attacks Iran, there’s no way he can come before the people of this country and explain to them why he’s attacking Iran and not North Korea ; in light of it’s recent antics and the fact it has already launched missiles that have hit our waters. Let me remind you that Bush has a twenty seven percent approval rating and Cheney has between twelve and eighteen percent. Not to mention they are talking about sending another 20 -50 k worth of soldiers and marines back over to Iraq ; many of whom have already done two and even three tours. If I was in charge of the resistance movement in Iraq, I’d really begin to up the ante with improvised explosives and roadside bombs. Trust me……If Bush sends another 20 -50k worth of people over to Iraq and secretarian violence stays at it’s current level, we keep losing five to eight people a day….and more hostages are taken……You will see a small uprising in this country similar to that of Vietnam – And that will be the end of Bush and the Neocons. We're tired of this shit....they're BANKRUPTING this country and the mainstream is beginning to see the big picture and understand that we are going to be paying for this for a long time to come.... And some are going to rise up. quote:
He hasn't taken advantage of his country's enemies weaknesses, his enemies have been charitable in the extreme in fighting an unnecessary war (Iraq) and getting themselve bogged down and allowing its client state (Israel) in the middle east to also fight an unnecessary war that has strengthened its enemies. Sure he has....If you look back at both the face to face and six party talks, Ahamdinejad has basically used a very similar strategy as Kim - There's dialogue for a while, then the talk of concessions, then the concessions are repealed back - Delay Delay Delay, until you eventually win out. Not to mention, most of the technology used in the design and simulation aspects of the weaponry came from Pakistan / China, via the greedy west. quote:
Iran's economy isn't doing well and with the threat of international sanctions it will do less well. It's a good bet that neither Russia, China nor any of their Muslim neighbors will comply with any potential sanctions. quote:
Meanwhile there is unrest and demonstrations in the universities. The majority of the country being under 25 and not born when the Iranian revolution occured. They want modernisation and freedom. Ahamdinejad has to decide between clamping down or liberalizing. Heads the opposition win, tails he loses. Yeah.... I saw that - You have a good point there. And maybe something will eventually happen. quote:
Like all leaders that pretend to be strong, they seldom are and are really covering up their weaknesses. Take a note of Bush. The epitome of a weak character. Well....something in my gut tells me that Ahamdinejad may already have a nuclear weapon. He very well could have obtained it on the black market from Russia - So I don't think he's bluffing. That's just a feeling tho...... - R
_____________________________
"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired." -General George S. Patton
|