MsKatHouston
Posts: 1909
Joined: 6/7/2006 From: Houston, TX Status: offline
|
quote:
Are there any rare breed of Mistress’s / Dommes / Captors that want the absolute power and the arrangement that it provides. Yes, there are. How this is defined may vary from person to person but people like this do exist. Some may want it for a lifetime, others for specific periods of play and some in the middle. quote:
The sub/slave/captive is totally dependent on that person - for comfort, food, news, interaction, anything, everything, including survival. Anything can be taken away as punishment. Or is this something that would be considered fantasy or at best a play scene of a given duration. At first glance this may seem fantasy driven and unrealistic. However, I think it is doable. Complete survival issues can be accomplished without continual supervision if proper guidelines and rules are established. For example, you may not have to specifically ask me permission to pee every time you have to. But, I may tell you you may do so at exactly 8 am, noon, 3 pm, etc. If you miss one of those times, tough. I may give you guidelines as to when you can go somewhere, what you may do and adjust things depending on the situation. These can all be accomplished with setting rules and can be done without constant, complete, in person management. This can be a very real way of living. With proper organization and communication, it does not need to be so time intensive and a lot of work. However, without that, or without experience with it, it may be best to start out with a duration of short play to work out the kinks in the process (no pun intended) quote:
The thought of having a slave imprisoned for an indeterminable time is indeed chilling. Those who don't understand such a situation may wonder what's in it for the captor. It seems Mistress’s / Dommes / Captors becomes the servant, waiting on the captive hand and foot. I suppose that would depend on the dynamic. I feel I would not be the servant waiting on the captor. Instead, I would make sure the rules are adhered to and my needs are met within those boundaries and issues are addressed. I, personally, would not desire a submissive who needed continual management. I prefer a slave who has skills and traits that will help please me. If working within a tightly structured environment, the slave may be completely the captive and still serve me and my needs without turning the tables into more work for the Mistress. quote:
I think that answer to that is the psychological satisfaction of having such extreme control. As long as it is dealing with my needs, I am great with extreme control. Keep in mind, though, that maybe what I need on a particular day is a rousing debate or to go dancing. If the slave is capable of fulfilling those needs when I desire them, I am all for extreme control. quote:
In my opinion I am still talking about slavery. Only slavery completely on the Dominant's terms, with no regard at all for what the submissive wants. I think what some may read is that this is not actually the case. Many people who have approached me with this scenario, though, have indicated it is not actually on my terms. They have a very specific fantasy in mind and want that. So, if there is a time, for example, I want to cuddle on the couch that's what I want. If that does not coincide with the slave's fantasy ideal, then the slave gets pissy. So, as long as it truly is on my terms, how I define it, it's all good. quote:
It isn't a partnership, or even really a relationship. I am talking about a situation where the slave is simply an object for the Dominant to do with as they please. This is actually pretty hot. The reality for me, though, is I'm not getting into any situation with someone I do not enjoy on a personal level. So, I can, would and do objectify a slave to some degree but not 24/7. I think in a 24/7 situation, human emotions can skew the complete objectification of the slave at times. But again, if it is on the Domme's terms, then all is good. quote:
Captivity has an appeal to me, but it also feels rather selfish: if I’m bound/locked up rather than being “of use” I feel that I’m getting what I want and someone would have to be looking after me and doing possibly everything for me, depending on the type of captivity Having a slave locked up and not in use 24/7 seems a bit unrealistic. The slave must have some use for me. That does not mean, though, that when not in use, he can't be locked up. There are safety measures that can be added and rules for times when not in use or sleeping. I guess it would depend on the severity and the situations as to whether or not it is truly selfish. If there is zero use for the dominant then yes, I'd say that was pretty selfish and would get utterly boring for the dominant. But if the dominant is getting what she wants and then when done, locks you up, it seems to be a win/win situation. quote:
I have to admit, a long time ago, for a brief moment I pondered the concept of getting sent to prison or self admitting to an asylum , but I’m way too scared and worried to actually go through with it. Getting sent to prison or to an asylum, imo, is not the same as a slave situation as you describe. quote:
Honestly, I don't really want to break the law, (not seriously enough to be imprisoned) and I don't want to be an embarrassment to my family either. I’m far from convinced that it'd be sane or correct choice for me to make. I would have to agree with you there. quote:
Furthermore I don't really think captivity alone would be right for me; I feel I need to be of use in some way or fashion as well. Then, I am sure you can find what it is you seek eventually. For most dominants, they also want to get something out of it so being useful is a good trait to have.
_____________________________
-Kat ~If you can't be a good example, you'll just have to serve as a horrible warning~
|