ImpGrrl -> RE: Regaining control of slave/submissive (12/31/2006 11:54:27 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SirDominic As for me, I find myself in the unusual position of disagreeing with BitaTruble. Some subs are very submissive by nature, and do what is expected simply because that is what their Dom wants. There are a lot of subs, though, who like to test boundaries, push the envelope, see what they can get away with. In this situation, it is the Dom's responsibility to maintain control. The sub tests because she wants and or needs the continued confirmation that her Dom cares enough to keep her in her place. Fact is being a Dom is a lot of work, especially in a 24/7 lifestyle. By allowing her to set her own rules, you have not done your job as Dom. I think this was more because of your lack of experience more than anything else. Still the damage has been done. At this point though you are in a tough position. Although several have mentioned on how the "force her to the floor" approach would really turn them on, I think this is a huge risk to take. If she is not the kind of person who would go for that, especially after so long being more vanilla, you could kill the relationship right there. I'm not saying that would happen, just that it is a real possibility; what turns one person on is an insult to another. But before you go through any of this, I think you need to first spend a great deal of personal time determining what it is You really want, and what You are really willing to do to get it. As one of the earlier posters suggested, you might like the idea of a 24/7 Dom, but you might not have the personality for it; the drive to do the constant work to keep control. If your relationship turned vanilla because over time, you just relaxed into your real persona, then you might want to consider that you are not cut out to be a Dom. Nothing wrong in that, but you have to be honest with yourself and find these answers before you even begin to deal with her. Best of luck, Sir Dominic I definitely agree with your last two paragraphs. But the rest, to me, is about personal responsibility. If I agreed to be my owner's slave, and being my owner's slave meant XYZ - it's not his responsibility to make sure that I do XYZ, it's mine. Yes, he should notice and call my attention to it, especially if I'm forgetting, etc. But if he has to repeatedly correct me, something is wrong. I recognize that some people do need to test boundaries, etc - and that's ok when *both partners agree to that within the dynamic*. Otherwise, I'd lay the responsibility for obeying squarely on the s-type.
|
|
|
|