whisperedsighs
Posts: 349
Joined: 11/12/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: TPEOwner I've been meeting prospective bdsm partners via the internet, and before that via print classified ads for well over 20 years. Back in the day, you wrote a few lines about who you were and what you were looking for and had a box number on your ad for replies. Someone contacted you or vice versa, you spoke on the phone once or twice, then you met for dinner or a drink, and if it went well, you saw them again. Very simple and quick, and the most you had to lose was a few hours of your time. Now? I was surfing female submissive ads on here yesterday, and I came across a woman who had 27 (yes I counted them) qualifications that a prospective dominant must meet in order for her to be interested. Now I'm the first one to tell people not to settle for less than they want and need, but I have 7 or 8 must have's, and consider myself quite picky. In the past 7 years that I have been actively seeking an LTR, I have yet to find anyone who met my standards (it's the trustworthy and able to trust that seems to trip them all up). So my question for everyone is, are we over screening? The internet gives us all the time and tools to question, disect and anylyze anyone before making any sort of decision, but it also removes all nuance, charm, charisma and chemistry. Is there anyone who has been doing this for any length of time who hasn't found someone who seemed perfect on line, only to meet them and go "blech". I wonder how many times the opposite might be true, but of course we never meet them to find out. Add in the on line liars and the game players who have everyone suspiscious of everyone else, and it's a miracle anyone ever meets anyone at all. Now the safety nazis can all tune out, because I've heard it all before, but any adult who doesn't know how to arrange a safe public meeting these days isn't firing on all cylinders. Is writing lengthy profiles with 27 prequalification demands, followed by days weeks or months of online communication really a better investment of our time and energy than exchanging an e-mail or two, a phone call or two, then meeting? And what's more important, is it a more effective for finding suitable matches? I think the endless online emails and IM's are completely a waste of time. It isn't until you meet in person that you will know if the chemistry is there to begin with. You may find that the person you have been talking to has some strange odor you just can't handle or just leaves you cold when you look into their eyes. I guess that is why I don't get the whole online relationship thing, or the long distance thing either. I mean yeah, I met this great guy the past couple years at fetishcon down in Florida, and we have been chatting online since, but we met, there is a chemistry there, and a friendship if nothing else. He I would consider continuing a conversation with, because we started with a in person meeting. Plus neither one of us is asking for anything more then fun and laughter. But the whole, painfully devoting yourself to someone you never met in person, just doesn't make sense to me. Seems you may be passing up someone just around the corner, because you have put blinders on in devotion to an online relationship. I think the couple of emails, maybe a phone call, and then meeting, using good common sense precautions is the best way all around.
_____________________________
oh my god that was so wrong! .... again please!
|