MissBabydoll
Posts: 62
Joined: 8/9/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Noah quote:
ORIGINAL: missturbation ... After all logically speaking a sadist relies on the lack of pleasure their 'victim' takes from pain and humiliation. Patently false. (this has been a public service announcement) It's rare that I find myself agreeing with a maledom about much of anything, but I am down with this. I'm a Sadist in the DSSM community sense of the term--that is, I enjoy inflicting pain and humiliation, but only on submissives who want it and consent to it. I use safewords, and if I slip up and cause harm I feel completely wretched about it. (For example, when it comes to ass-beating with whatever implement, welts don't count as harm in My book, serious bruises are iffy--but broken skin, banged bones, and deep or connective tissue damage are non-safe, whether the sub wants them or not, and I won't do those things on purpose.) The clinical definition of a sadist, as noted elesewhere in these posts, is someone who is aroused by the victim's fear and *unwillingness* and genuine misery. That's a sick fuck, not a responsible Player-with-cruelty, which is what I try to be. God knows there are enough of them around: other than scumbags who dope women with rufies or whatever and then fuck them, most rapists are sadists in this clinical sense.
|