Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 7:52:03 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fastcars1
I beleive that we are at war with terrorism, and I beleive that success is Iraq is vital to defeating the people that carry out this terrorism in the name their god.



Only CONGRESS has the authority or duty to declare war. You BELIEVE whatever you want to, but like belief in Jesus or Muhammad or Santa Claus, it's no basis to make policy.



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to fastcars1)
Profile   Post #: 201
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 8:08:02 AM   
beautyImurDaddy


Posts: 58
Joined: 8/29/2006
Status: offline
Maybe this needs to be in a new thread, but i was just curious as i skimmed along some of the comments here.

Let's assume for a moment that certain countries, i.e. Iran, Iraq etc, maintain radical Islamic/Muslim leaders... whether friendly to us now or otherwise.... how would it impact our relationships (what little we have) with these countries IF Hilary Clinton were to come into office? Do you think it would have any impact at all? Would they go against most of their own basic principals and treat her as an equal? or would they slip even further against the U.S. because of religious beliefs in regards to women?

Just some food for thought and random idiocies i was thinking about and would be curious as to others thoughts on this.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 202
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 8:08:35 AM   
fastcars1


Posts: 21
Joined: 7/13/2005
Status: offline
You're right, but Congress voted on the war.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 203
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 8:11:54 AM   
fastcars1


Posts: 21
Joined: 7/13/2005
Status: offline
That's a good point in light of her gender, and the way they treat their women. Another point to add is that they hated us long before we entered Iraq.

(in reply to beautyImurDaddy)
Profile   Post #: 204
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 8:23:38 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fastcars1

You're right, but Congress voted on the war.


Why do you lie?

Congress passed an Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) against Iraq for the limited purpose of

Well, lets just use the LAW to illustrate.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF UNITED STATES ARMED FORCES.

(a) Authorization.--The President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to-- (1) defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq; and (2) enforce all relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions regarding Iraq.

Which is NOT a declaration of war, which is supported by Attorney General ALBERTO GONZOLES.

* "There was not a war declaration, either in connection with Al Qaida or in Iraq. It was an authorization to use military force. I only want to clarify that, because there are implications. Obviously, when you talk about a war declaration, you're possibly talking about affecting treaties, diplomatic relations. And so there is a distinction in law and in practice. And we're not talking about a war declaration. This is an authorization only to use military force."

– U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing on Wartime Executive Power and the National Security Agency's Surveillance Authority, Februrary 6, 2006



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to fastcars1)
Profile   Post #: 205
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 8:33:12 AM   
fastcars1


Posts: 21
Joined: 7/13/2005
Status: offline
I don't mind trading ideas with you Farglebargle, but please be civil. Calling someone a liar is an insult. The Congress did vote on the use of force against Iraq, and it passed. It was a joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 206
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 8:36:52 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
If you read the thread dcmike1 asked why was it that the US had to fight the terrorists alone.

The US has every right to spend money where it wants and on what friends it wants but don't complain when other countries don't help out in a war on terrorism US policy created.


And how exactly did we create this terrorism ... because we are unwilling to give our money, to those that hate us?
 
Don't you think some of the blame might be on the people that have their hand out, and insist that if we don't fill it up with money, they will blow things up? We call that extortion here in the States. what do you call it over there?
 
Honestly, your point is almost laughable, even to me, that doesn't support the American adventure in Iraq.

< Message edited by caitlyn -- 2/6/2007 8:38:00 AM >

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 207
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 8:37:35 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

You dodge this question every time I ask it ... Doesn't the United States have the right to spend it's money, however it wants? Don't we have the right to have the friends that we want?
 
The problem with your arguments, is that you treat what belongs to us, as if it belongs to the world. You present option a).
 
a) United States gives money to small country, and they become a friend.
 
... while we see option B).
 
b) small country becomes a friend of the United States, and then gets our money.
 
... now, option A) may be the way you want to go. That's fine, go there with your own money!


Actually your argument would be helped if the US didn't interfer so much in other countries and tell them what they can and can't do.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 208
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 8:39:06 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: fastcars1

I don't mind trading ideas with you Farglebargle, but please be civil. Calling someone a liar is an insult. The Congress did vote on the use of force against Iraq, and it passed. It was a joint resolution to authorize the use of United States Armed Forces against Iraq.


You said AND I QUOTE: "You're right, but Congress voted on the war." Also in the past you've attempted to misrepresent MY statements. That's a PATTERN OF DECEPTIVE BEHAVIOR.

NOW, when presented with clear evidence of your dishonesty, you flip flop, and waffle, and expect people to believe your feelings are hurt?

Boo fucking Hoo.



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to fastcars1)
Profile   Post #: 209
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 8:42:27 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
Actually your argument would be helped if the US didn't interfer so much in other countries and tell them what they can and can't do.


But, other countries can tell us what we can do ... right?
 
Like it or not, we are a superpower ... that just is, what it is. Maybe you would have preferred to have the Soviets or Communist Chinese as masters, instead of us as your friends?
 
You know, you did manage to stand up against us with protests, without having tanks roll through your streets. I think that unlikely, had you stood up to either the Soviets, or Communist Chinese ... or at least that is the lesson history teaches.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 210
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 8:45:40 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
If you read the thread dcmike1 asked why was it that the US had to fight the terrorists alone.

The US has every right to spend money where it wants and on what friends it wants but don't complain when other countries don't help out in a war on terrorism US policy created.


And how exactly did we create this terrorism ... because we are unwilling to give our money, to those that hate us?
 
Don't you think some of the blame might be on the people that have their hand out, and insist that if we don't fill it up with money, they will blow things up? We call that extortion here in the States. what do you call it over there?
 
Honestly, your point is almost laughable, even to me, that doesn't support the American adventure in Iraq.


I think the US (not alone) put the Shah of Iran into power and since his overthrow has been unable to come to terms with the fact it was kicked out of Iran and Iranians see the US at one with the Shah in the oppression of Iranians.

The US (again not alone) is seen by the many Arabs as giving material support to dictatorships that oppress them because they want Arab resources ie. oil.

Many Arabs see Israel as a US client state which the US uncritically supports and gives material support for its own strategic reasons, ie. the pursuit of Arab oil.

Many Arabs see the Iraq invasion as an imperial conquest and grab for Arab resources.

Imperialism as we Brits know, creates terrorists and that is how the US has created terrorists.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 2/6/2007 8:48:40 AM >


_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 211
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 8:53:12 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
What types of government do the people in the Middle east put in power, when the west is not involved?
 
Do you think there is any possibility, that rough-and-tumble governments are par for the course in the Middle East?

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 212
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 8:54:26 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

What types of government do the people in the Middle east put in power, when the west is not involved?

Do you think there is any possibility, that rough-and-tumble governments are par for the course in the Middle East?


Yes. Hussein was a mellow leader for that neck of the woods, and HE had to slaughter his own citizens by the hundreds to maintain order.



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 213
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 8:57:16 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: farglebargle


quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

What types of government do the people in the Middle east put in power, when the west is not involved?

Do you think there is any possibility, that rough-and-tumble governments are par for the course in the Middle East?


Yes. Hussein was a mellow leader for that neck of the woods, and HE had to slaughter his own citizens by the hundreds to maintain order.




Why was there so much unrest in Jordan at the time? The Palestinian conflict which the US exacerbates by uncritical support for its client state so the US has a military foothold in the area.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 214
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 8:58:53 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

What types of government do the people in the Middle east put in power, when the west is not involved?
 
Do you think there is any possibility, that rough-and-tumble governments are par for the course in the Middle East?


It is irrelevent what governments the Arabs would have without US interference, the point is that the dictatorships in the area are US puppets.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 215
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 9:00:47 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
The Israeli government doesn't need any help from the US exacerbating the situation...

Get the Governments out of the picture, and people just wanna have a pot-luck dinner and make sure their kids get on the school bus.



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 216
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 9:01:19 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
Exactly.
 
Blaming the west because there are ruthless leaders in the Middle East, is a little like blaming the weather person, because it's raining.
 
Mother Theresa couldn't hold the purple cushion for very long in a Middle Eastern country.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 217
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 9:04:53 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver
It is irrelevent what governments the Arabs would have without US interference, the point is that the dictatorships in the area are US puppets.


Did you really just say that? 

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 218
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 9:05:22 AM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
Don't get me started on Mother Theresa!



_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 219
RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? - 2/6/2007 9:08:50 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
Yes, she had a third cousin that was American, which makes her responsible for terrorism.

(in reply to farglebargle)
Profile   Post #: 220
Page:   <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Who is going to help us take on Iran and company? Page: <<   < prev  9 10 [11] 12 13   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078