luckydog1 -> RE: Threat to world peace??????? (1/24/2007 7:36:05 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: thompsonx quote:
ORIGINAL: luckydog1 There is a waiting list for free/cost seats on Millitary Planes. \ The only people allowed to fly on military airplains are active duty military and their family and retired military and their family. First priority goes to active duty on orders, active duty on leave, retired and finally family under certain circumstances. The only civilians I know of who can fly on military aircraft are government officials on official government business. The flight is free and if you are not priority 1...active duty on orders or government service on orders, your status is space available. I have flown all over the world for free ,space available, on military aircraft. If the one I wanted was full I just waited till one came up that had room. Never did I have to wait for more than 24 hours. As I mentioned in my previous post, millitary planes rescue hurt civilians all the time. They get to train under real conditions, its a win win situation. Same goes for dropping a little hay It is up the people of Colorado to decide how to use thier tax money. The feds didn't do that. If Coloradons do not like how they are goverened they can kick the govenor out. But I bet the majority of them are glad that the cows did not die suffering. I bet they are also glad that the Beef herd was saved, along with all the food that is going to be sold, and taxed. The people of Colorado did not vote to have the government spend their money to give welfare to rich cattle barrons. How much would you like to bet that the people of Colorado are in favor of welfare for the rich. Since when does the government tax food? The people of Colorado certainly did vote for the government that made that decision. They have been voting for what you term "welfare for the rich" consistently for over 100 years, so yeah I will take that bet. So are you saying you are opposed to representative democratic republics? I did not realise you hated the constitution of the USA. I understand you better now. The government always(indirectly) taxes food, but I was refering to the income taxes paid by the ranchers, and the income(and property) taxes paid by the people who work in the associated fields( slaughtering, preserving, shipping, marketing, ect.) You know all the people who would be laid off if the Beef herd was destroyed. All the people (and thier kids)who would then require gov help. This is where it really is tompson, the taxes from the cows saved by the minimal extra cost action, will be used by the elected gov of Colorado( and perhaps localities), to pay for public schools, hospitals, neo natal health care, adult literacy programs, ect. These will benefit the poor of Colorado. Schools are paid for from property tax not the general fund. I notice you didn't even attempt to argue with the other things I asserted are paid from Colorado state taxes. But you are flat out wrong, "Colorado public schools receive funding from a variety of sources. However, most revenues to Colorado's 178 school districts are provided through the Public School Finance Act of 1994 (as amended). In budget year 2006-07, this legislation provides for over $4.7 billion of funding to Colorado school districts via state taxes ($3.04 billion), local specific ownership (vehicle registration) taxes ($170.6 million), and local property taxes ($1.57 billion). Moneys provided via the Public School Finance Act of 1994 are available to each school district to fund the costs of providing public education. Follow the links below for more information." http://www.cde.state.co.us/index_finance.htm You dont care about them, you just want to hurt the ranchers and those you percieve as their allies. I am not interested in hurting ranchers I just don't feel that the rich should be getting welfare. You just want them to suffer, if it means less money for the schools who cares. Nope: I just want them to play by the same rules the little guy has to play by. If I owned a ski resort and it did not snow this year do you think the government should cover my losses? Um, the little guy gets all kinds of gov help, besides actuall welfare. So why begrudge the cost of a little hay, as I have explained several times, they fly around to train anyway, so that's not really a cost. As to the Ski resort, it would be up to the local/state governments to decide if they want to or not. In my city we subsidise a ski area, because it is good for the community, and employs lots of people. Our big ski area has gotten many federal grants over the years. I see the world very differently. That is pretty obvious. Yes you like to pretend stuff and ignore reality. For instance how Colorado funds its schools. Or that sanitation doesnt matter. It is similar you not caring about the effects of thousands of puonds of fecees and urine in the shelters of Katrina. You simply don't give a damn about the people acutally suffering there. What part of New Orleans was an open sewer did you not understand? The addition of a few more tons of shit would not make any difference. Which is why I specifically mentioned "in the Shelters", where it would indeed have made a huge difference. The leftists/democrats started lying about how many were dead ( the racist weasel from Jefferson Parrish who orded his people to force the blacks back into the city was one of them)before the storm ended, I think I have stated on more than one post that I find no difference between the republicrats and the demopubs....this is not a red and blue controversy so please do not try to put words in my mouth to make it one. I didnt call you a blue or a Democrat. I stated that Leftists and Democrats engaged in exactly what you are doing. I can see where you would have liked the Cholera to have been much worse, imagine the anti Bush ads you could make from the piles of the bodies. Instead of dealing with the real issues you just want to use thier suffering as a political tool. Really you have to get off of this red and blue thing. That was not and is not the point I was making. I never said anything about Red and Blue, you did. One does not have to be a Democrat (or Blue) to be anti Bush. My point in mentioning Katrina in the first place was that it was an example of Anarchy in action. Its horrible and people beg for someone to pick up a stick and restore order. Perhaps you should do a bit more reading about just how much lack of order there really was. One good site that is indicative of the level of order is the account of the U.S Coast Guard. When the feds went into New Orleans and started disarming the citizenery I did not see anyone applauding that. No one begged for someone to pick up a stick. All they were begging for was food and water. No they were begging for a lot more than food and water. In fact people in different parts of the area were needing different things. The coast guard was just in the navigable parts of the city, they were not in the shelters where most people were. The parts in Anarchy. The rich neighboorhoods stayed dry, and they set up armed guards, even a few Bars stayed open the entire time. thompson \Luckydog
|
|
|
|