RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


Mercnbeth -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 9:47:26 AM)

quote:

I say the above as someone who LOVES playing with gay men and women but come on people, these are the same people who invented glory holes and bath houses...Try reading things like the Leatherman's handbook or other contemporary writing and the myth of the glorious "old guard" will fade away to reveal a rich but a bit less shiny reality.


Mike,
You say that like it is a bad thing.

I'll give you the perspective of remembering those days and having some experience. The difference to me is I remember it was a lot more fun! From the "glory holes" to the sticky floor at Hellfire, it was disgustingly fun. Nobody cared about who did what, with what to whom. You couldn't generate a debate on the labels anyone used. We laughed an awful lot, at each other, at weekend warriors, at cheating spouses, at ourselves; and saw nothing wrong with it. The fun continued when we stopped laughing and went into the back room and partied the night away.

In fact when AIDS showed up we thought it was god's way of saying; "party's over - you are having TOO much fun!"

There were some strong egos but their pretentiousness didn't get in the way of the 24/7 party that was occurring; at least in NYC. Integrity had value, trust was an asset you didn't want to risk losing, hypocrisy the most deadly 'sin'. Now those things are moving targets. 'Intent', 'image' and projected 'feelings' are now the coin of the realm.

quote:

If you are worried about who gets what trophy and what they did to earn it, you have your head screwed on wrong.


It used to be assumed that what I quoted from you, was learned on the first day. Now it should be a morning prayer.

Have fun! Laugh! Enjoy!




agirl -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 10:16:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: BOUNTYHUNTER

quote:

ORIGINAL: sunnydays

i think (IMHO) that you are talking more about slaves..subs tend to have a say..and a true slave is like you have described


Subs do have a say until their brassy mouth and attitude get them throw on  to my shoulder and then off to a good spanking...Once one wears my collar they give up their rights to opinions,I will listen to her point of view and then make the correct decision for the good of us all.....


I had opinions before I wore a collar and I have opinions still. I can't quite see where having an opinion and having a *brassy mouth and attitude*  meet. Being opinionated isn't the same as *having an opinion*.

I might have to give up the freedom to express my opinion, but I'm not sure how anyone can stop me from holding one.

If you listen to her point of view, then she obviously has an opinion worth hearing.

agirl







rhythmboi -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 10:28:36 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: LotusSong

quote:

ORIGINAL: MaryT

quote:

ORIGINAL: LotusSong
Ever try to make a cake with only the ingredients you like?  It's not the same cake. 


I didn't even know there was a recipe.

MaryT



There is always an origin.  There is aways a reason.  I found it disturbing, that on this forum, are people that even doubted that there was ever an "old guard". 
 
But as in everything, if things are too difficult, lower the standards so everyone gets a trophy (<---an analogy).  


I'm totally new here, so i'm certainly not well versed in the history of bdsm, but i know from other parts of life that rules and standards are pretty meaningless if they're not meeting people's needs. I'm curious why folks think that's not the case here.




agirl -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 10:41:00 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thaimeeuppppp

I think that is probably it. When andhow did that happen?
Is everything doomed to be diluted and turned mainstream?
Warm fuzzy BDSM seems such an oxymoron
Thank you



Warm and fuzzy. It's just a phrase. Why not define it?......... I wouldn't like to.

If there's one thing I'm pretty sound on ......it's that one person's *warm and fuzzy* isn't another's.......lol

I repeat......... You want to please someone; live for their pleasure and demands..........if you get to do so......... who's pleasing who?

agirl








QuietDom -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 11:23:54 AM)

Yep, it's all watered down now.  Not as good as it was before.  Sure was better in the old days.  Slaves used to crawl four miles to the dungeon, uphill both ways.  These young whippersnappers today don't know how good they got it...

Don't we hear a variation of this lament on a regular basis in just about everything?  I take it with a grain of salt in most things, but it needs a full box of Sifto when I hear it in a BDSM context, because it embodies a great, blatant, blazing contradiction.  Namely the idea that, as a Dominant, I'm doing things 'right' when I'm in charge and doing things my way, and yet, somehow, I'm not being as Dominant as I 'should' be when I do exactly that, instead of doing things in the way that some other guys supposedly did back in the 70s.




SirDominic -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 11:33:05 AM)

BDSM has certainly changed almost beyond recognition with the huge influx of newcomers entering the lifestyle since the Internet really took off.

Like the OP, I get the sense that a lot of the people on here are really just looking for a committed relationship (i.e., marriage) with someone who has similar kinks to their own. Should they be considered to be in a BDSM relationship? (I know someone will respond "If they say they are, then they are". I do not buy that argument).

Many subs have gotten very demanding on what they will or won't accept; even down to a 15 point (or more) checklist. Negotiation has always been a part of the lifestyle for a lot of people, but this concept of a list of requirements just to be considered to be their Dom does seem a relatively new phenomenon. Can someone really be considered submissive if a Dom has to jump through all their requirement hoops to be considered? Most Masters I know personally would sneer at such an attitude.

On the other hand, life is change. What was once the lifestyle is no more. Are we worse off because of that? Does it really matter? I think it does only in the sense that if one is looking for a more "traditional" BDSM relationship, that has become a lot harder.

Namaste, Sir Dominic




LotusSong -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 11:35:25 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: QuietDom

Yep, it's all watered down now.  Not as good as it was before.  Sure was better in the old days.  Slaves used to crawl four miles to the dungeon, uphill both ways.  These young whippersnappers today don't know how good they got it...

Don't we hear a variation of this lament on a regular basis in just about everything?  I take it with a grain of salt in most things, but it needs a full box of Sifto when I hear it in a BDSM context, because it embodies a great, blatant, blazing contradiction.  Namely the idea that, as a Dominant, I'm doing things 'right' when I'm in charge and doing things my way, and yet, somehow, I'm not being as Dominant as I 'should' be when I do exactly that, instead of doing things in the way that some other guys supposedly did back in the 70s.



make that the 40'S :)




darksdesire -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 11:51:04 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirDominic

BDSM has certainly changed almost beyond recognition with the huge influx of newcomers entering the lifestyle since the Internet really took off.

Like the OP, I get the sense that a lot of the people on here are really just looking for a committed relationship (i.e., marriage) with someone who has similar kinks to their own. Should they be considered to be in a BDSM relationship? (I know someone will respond "If they say they are, then they are". I do not buy that argument).

Many subs have gotten very demanding on what they will or won't accept; even down to a 15 point (or more) checklist. Negotiation has always been a part of the lifestyle for a lot of people, but this concept of a list of requirements just to be considered to be their Dom does seem a relatively new phenomenon. Can someone really be considered submissive if a Dom has to jump through all their requirement hoops to be considered? Most Masters I know personally would sneer at such an attitude.

On the other hand, life is change. What was once the lifestyle is no more. Are we worse off because of that? Does it really matter? I think it does only in the sense that if one is looking for a more "traditional" BDSM relationship, that has become a lot harder.

Namaste, Sir Dominic


Having only done this for the past two years plus, I'm curious as to why wanting both a committed relationship and a bdsm relationship are mutually exclusive.  My Master didn't jump through any hoops, rather he was who he was, and because he was the man  he was, I decided to submit to him.  I've got a long term loving relationship, and I'm a slave.  Does having a long term commitment, does wanting such a commitment make one's slavery or Mastery less valid?  It is far more than kink...it extends way beyond the bedroom and into the total dynamic of the relationship. 




agirl -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 2:29:25 PM)

Supply and demand , maybe?......lol

I'm not submissive but I don't see where demanding anything can *fit* in my relationship.  It wasn't even part of my marriages, actually.

agirl




MzMia -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 2:59:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirDominic

BDSM has certainly changed almost beyond recognition with the huge influx of newcomers entering the lifestyle since the Internet really took off.

Like the OP, I get the sense that a lot of the people on here are really just looking for a committed relationship (i.e., marriage) with someone who has similar kinks to their own. Should they be considered to be in a BDSM relationship? (I know someone will respond "If they say they are, then they are". I do not buy that argument).

Many subs have gotten very demanding on what they will or won't accept; even down to a 15 point (or more) checklist. Negotiation has always been a part of the lifestyle for a lot of people, but this concept of a list of requirements just to be considered to be their Dom does seem a relatively new phenomenon. Can someone really be considered submissive if a Dom has to jump through all their requirement hoops to be considered? Most Masters I know personally would sneer at such an attitude.

On the other hand, life is change. What was once the lifestyle is no more. Are we worse off because of that? Does it really matter? I think it does only in the sense that if one is looking for a more "traditional" BDSM relationship, that has become a lot harder.

Namaste, Sir Dominic


Great post!




LotusSong -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 3:16:34 PM)

I think the one thing that stands out most for me is, what I call,  the Angora Collar.
 
In Junior High and High School, when a couple decided to go "steady", the boy would give his class ring to his sweetheart.  Of course it was ever so over-sized and she would then buy a long strand of angora wool and wrap the shank of the ring.  Then she would take a toothbrush and brush it into a fluffy froth that floated around her finger.  Quite the status symbol.  It seems the new BDSM carries this tone.  It's about "how quickly one can get collared" and OF COURSE the next step is the coveted 24/7 followed by the ultimate "Must marry Master!"
 
It all boils down to "same game.. different name".




MaryT -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 3:24:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LotusSong
There is no list.. and if there was one, it'd be disputed as myth.  Someday, if you truly are lucky, you'll find an actual Leatherman willing to enlighten you.  There might even be one on here.


While I appreciate your concern over the state of my enlightenment, I am enlightened enough to appreciate that diversity is good.   I'm surprised that you don't place a higher value on it.  I am curious about what it is you believe I need to be enlightened about.  You've been extremely vague ... But if you know, surely you can enlighten me.  [:)]

MaryT




MaryT -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 3:27:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SirDominic

BDSM has certainly changed almost beyond recognition with the huge influx of newcomers entering the lifestyle since the Internet really took off ... Many subs have gotten very demanding on what they will or won't accept;


Don't you see the connection here?




MaryT -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 3:28:48 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rhythmboi

I'm totally new here, so i'm certainly not well versed in the history of bdsm, but i know from other parts of life that rules and standards are pretty meaningless if they're not meeting people's needs. I'm curious why folks think that's not the case here.


We are discussing standards that don't actually exist, and perhaps that makes them more meaningful ... [&:]

MaryT




LadyHugs -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 3:39:55 PM)

Dear thaimeeuppppp, Ladies and Gentlemen;
 
You have on your original post many questions.  So, I will answer them in sections.
 
1.   I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down?  A.  It depends on your perspective and or where you have started.  If you start over 30 years ago, what is practiced now will be considered 'watered down.'  Whereas, someone new to the lifestyle has only myth, other's lives lived honorably so, porn with BDSM kink, magazines and or books with people's vivid imagination, an occassional play party, munches and or support and educational groups as a reference point.
 
2.  Is modern day BDSM  has become watered down or if its just a little different because most people on here are essentially heterosexual?  A.  Heterosexuals are not the total blame for BDSM being watered down.  It is considered different even in Gay Leather circles, as well as Lesbian Leather circles from years past.  I'm seeing heterosexual women seek out and going to academy weekends where they flood the application process whereas, Gay men have declined in attending such an academy, that I know about.  Yet, it just could be a matter of schedule conflicts which drops attendance.  Regardless, any one person can come to many conclusions based on assumptions and or second guessing.  However, I am finding that Heterosexual women are wanting more from their life's choice and their expectations of what their Masters/Mistresses should be.  Self entitlement of "Master" or "Mistress" isn't cutting bread anymore.  What separates the want to be Masters/Mistresses from the Final Leather Masters/Mistresses is the enlightenment most seek as well as looking within.
 
As your original post makes a few statements; I will now apply to those.
 
3. "...I have been reading many of these posts and it seems like many people are really more searching for very secure committed relationships where they have very few kinks in common."   A.  I am one who prefers to have a secure, committed relationship with many kinks in common.  However, I also want to see if someone else has shared vanilla interests as well.  There are only so many hours one can be in the dungeon and work a scene.  In real life, there is more 'every day' relationship interaction compared to BDSM interaction.  There needs to be a balance.  In addition, somebody may not have explored their kink fully yet or hit their glass ceiling.  I have yet to find a perfect match and would settle for a person that is 80% of what I seek.
 
4.  "...Many of the submissives seem opinionated and bossy."  A.  That is a matter of perception and perhaps in the circumstances of the moment.  I see submissives as Democratic, to which still use their voice, mind, spirit and physical being in a mutual pleasure with the Dominant.  I see those opinionated and bossy submissives as wild horses--they are free.  They choose when they submit and choose the person to submit to based on the cords struck within them.  Perhaps the time will come or not, where they find their freedom within slavery and committed to one that has earned their trust, feel secure with and are free within the boundaries they helped create.  That said, there are indeed some who are just 'do me' types.  That is life.
 
5.  "...Women have always been the sneakier sex."  A.  I've seen some really sneaky men in my lifetime.  If you take out the gender and judge a person by their deeds and their words; perhaps you will see that this isn't a gender issue but a issue of ethics, morals, conduct and honor. 
 
6.  "...So, while they (women) say they sub, there is more of a need to be taken care of than anything."  A.  I have seen a lot of male slaves in need of being taken care of mentally, emotionally and or spiritually.  Again, I don't think it is a gender issue but an issue and or perhaps a perception of what Mastering a submissive requires as far as maintaining the submissive and or slave.  It should not be seen as 'weak' of a man to seek the same thing women seek--to be taken care of, it the capacity of a slave/submissive.  In my mind's eyes I see, everybody wants to feel safe, secure and taken care of, regardless which role you assume; be it Dominant and or submissive.
 
In summary, the dynamics of D/s and or M/s isn't about gender--it is about the total person regardless of gender.  It is about reaching a state of happiness, to be safe and free to operate as one's self--rather than be a personal perception imposed upon another.  It is best to find personal happiness and those who appreciate that personal happiness in others and wish to be a part of it on a long term basis.
 
Just some thoughts.

Respectfully submitted for consideration,

Lady Hugs




amayos -> BDSM watered down? (1/22/2007 3:42:44 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: thaimeeuppppp
I have been reading many of these posts and it seems like many people are really more searching for very secure committed relationships where they have a few kinks in common.


I completely agree. It's not too hard to see that among many individuals, BDSM has become really nothing more than a sub culturally hip bedroom or clubbing hobby. Many in related communities are ultimately on safari for a more traditional dating partner in latex. While there is nothing wrong with that in and of itself, it does become a problem for the more serious types who embrace a reality behind concepts and terms, and don't simply see these as stanchions for pansexual thrill rides or mating games. Due to the power of creative invention in this gamut of people, what should be simple, painfully obvious concepts of standard can't ever be agreed upon. In fact, we can't even imply that without getting our figurative heads cut off. Communication problems arise and arise again because so many people are on so many different pages regarding what this stuff is really all about.

I feel all this pandemonium is a necessary camouflage, however. As BDSM continues to become more accepted as a "lifestyle," the inherited supposition that it's all just an elaborate facade for Kinky Adult Fun® and alternative dating allows the more serious seekers greater acceptance and transparency in what they do. As the spiral grows, that field of potential selection widens, too. In the end, this is beneficial for all, even if people get on each other's nerves with increasing regularity.





ladysekhmetka -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 3:44:46 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LotusSong

quote:

ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael

If you are worried about who gets what trophy and what they did to earn it, you have your head screwed on wrong.

That makes your focus external, not internal, and even worse, outside of your relationship.

As for "old guard" they most certainly existed. Horny butt pirates who fucked anyone over for the first hot young stud who walked in and arranged a system where the old men got to use all the new young meat as bottoms and over the years has gotten glorified into some "high standard" I say the above as someone who LOVES playing with gay men and women but come on people, these are the same people who invented glory holes and bath houses...Try reading things like the Leatherman's handbook or other contemporary writing and the myth of the glorious "old guard" will fade away to reveal a rich but a bit less shiny reality.


This whole thread reminded me of this..hense the"trophy" reference:

"Dee-dee-dee!"-----> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5d5ss-5zcGM

There are crawling competitions.. and M/s competitions.. talk about ego run amok~! LOL




I read that and thought the same thing ^.^ I love Mencia.

On topic... if I were to have a slave/sub, they could certainly have their opinons and I would encourage them to express them... but in a polite manner. And everyone has their limits.




LotusSong -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 3:56:53 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MaryT

quote:

ORIGINAL: LotusSong
There is no list.. and if there was one, it'd be disputed as myth.  Someday, if you truly are lucky, you'll find an actual Leatherman willing to enlighten you.  There might even be one on here.


While I appreciate your concern over the state of my enlightenment, I am enlightened enough to appreciate that diversity is good.   I'm surprised that you don't place a higher value on it.  I am curious about what it is you believe I need to be enlightened about.  You've been extremely vague ... But if you know, surely you can enlighten me.  [:)]

MaryT



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leather_subculture




MaryT -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 4:15:05 PM)

Thanks, LS, but I am already familiar with the history, which is how I knew that using "old guard" as the standard would disqualify you from belonging.

MaryT




LotusSong -> RE: I wonder if modern day BDSM has become watered down (1/22/2007 4:29:31 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: MaryT

Thanks, LS, but I am already familiar with the history, which is how I knew that using "old guard" as the standard would disqualify you from belonging.

MaryT



I have never identified myself as old guard. I do like their means and methods
 
I allow others to label me as they will.  It gives people, who otherwise have none,  a sense of importance.
 
So in the future.. you know something already, please don't waste someone's time in attempting to Help you.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.0625