LadyEllen
Posts: 10931
Joined: 6/30/2006 From: Stourport-England Status: offline
|
Its all in the context P; At work, I'm the boss. I let the guys who work for me run as they will, within my guidelines. Occasionally I have to step in and resolve a breach of those guidelines, but there's a tacit understanding that my word is final, so in bdsm terms there is consent I suppose. In everyday life, I keep getting told I'm intimidating (honestly, I dont know I'm doing it and I'm not trying to be!). I assume this is why sometimes this means I get my own way and people take on a deferential "child role" towards me, but equally I assume this is why others might avoid me! So for those who do show deference, I guess you could say I domineer them or that they just take that position of their own accord, but the fact that some might avoid me says to me that its only those that like it or get something from it, that defer to me, so again they consent. Otherwise, if its "fun and games" or similar, then obviously they consent. I wonder if you are aiming at how/why a woman can overcome and dominate a man who is far stronger physically than she is? All I can say to that is, that physical strength is not an essential factor in achieving a "superiority" (loaded word, I know). Adolf Hitler, Napoleon Bonaparte, Alexander the Great..... all comparatively small men who dominated others by way of force of will rather than physical size and strength. Now, add into that idea of force of will a woman who is desired by you and you have it. It still requires though, that the other person "submits" I suppose, as a man with a strong force of will is unlikely to submit to the most beautiful woman in possession of the same will. E
_____________________________
In a test against the leading brand, 9 out of 10 participants couldnt tell the difference. Dumbasses.
|