sleazy
Posts: 781
Joined: 11/23/2006
From: UK
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne
Transparently!
As usual you are avoiding the question!
Mr Kettle has requested that Mr Pot produce just one picture that could reasonably be expected show missing aft sections of the aircraft. At the risk of sounding like a personal attack rather than the issues at hand.
quote:
Substantiate and support your last claim of a fluid gob of parts getting around the yellow non-damaged area and making a hole in the ring 3 wall!
Substantiate newtons 1st law? Forget it pal, its called law rather than theory for a good reason
quote:
quote:
ORIGINAL: sleazy
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne
That hole in ring 3 wall is not possible without a previously connected red dot as can be easily seen demonstrated throughout the expected damage zone. Damage has to be connectable to previous damage of greater magnitude as the deceleration occurs. Decelerating objects just do not magically speed up and like the jfk assassination zig zag through objects while doing no damage so it can accelerate again to go through the wall.
Research liquid dynamics.
You are apparently making the mistake of assuming a solid mass, rather than a group of objects that are actually behaving as a fluid.
By ring three there was no aircraft as such, just an awful lot of debris flying in formation. Heck there would have been no aircraft after the first few columns.
Show where i made a mistake or are we going to talk next about the price of rice in china?
Fine if you want to talk about bb's, bombs, cars, the price of rice in china, but then conclude it by: SHOWING YOUR WORK supporting your FLUID PARTS AND OFFICE EQUIPMENT THEORY based on the drawings the gov made of the damage assessment as i did!
Ok professor sleazy, an airplane is not bb's, or bombs, cars, or rice, so class is in session and we are waiting for a direct answer not diversions and explantions that in the end give no answer at all or answer by meaningless inuendo. frankly.
Having been pretty damn well mangled in the numerous collisions THERE IS NO AIRCRAFT! Just an awful lot of by now quite small bits of crap flying along together along the path of least resistance in vague formation (and actually depending on the timing now quite possibly being accelerated by the air/fuel explosion and as such getting an increase in their energy.
quote:
In case you forgot:
Substantiate and support your last claim of a fluid gob of parts getting around the yellow non-damaged area and making a hole in the ring 3 wall!
http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o296/nine_one_one/asce-illus-2.gif
hmmm, two columns closest to exit wound appear to be marked as damaged
Other than that get me a cray or six, the right kind of engineers and programmers, the complete specs for each individual column, aircraft component and office item, or failing that we can just accept the basic principles of physics........... or not as the case may be
_____________________________
Opinion is packaged by weight not volume, contents may settle during transit. Consult you medical practitioner. Do not attempt to stop moving parts by hand. Ensure all safety shields in place. Open this way up. Do not expose to temperatures exceeding 50C
|
RE: Hold the true terrorists responsible - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread