SirDiscipliner69
Posts: 2607
Joined: 2/1/2005 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth This slave has done things for Master, at His direction, that she would have, if she had been the one controlling things, insisted on RED and never a green go go go would have been considered. If this slave wanted to retain a certain level of control over her intimate relationship for whatever reason, she would have drawn the line at submissive…to this slave, there IS a difference between the two. It's rather simple- He calls the shots. He decides what limits His slave will have and with who. This slave is expected to, and does, respect Master’s limits. But you have actually defined what will happen as you have consented and decided to having any decision rights correct? Ross how does consent equal defining what will happen? State equals desire equals future equals consent. Ross
< Message edited by SirDiscipliner69 -- 2/5/2007 2:18:39 AM >
|