reamer
Posts: 57
Joined: 1/16/2007 Status: offline
|
Master Fire, a fair sentiment, cogently expressed. But this question/topic could be fairly viewed as a "stew", with many ingredients. One of which (as I stated) is not discussed here as of yet, and then there is another, dealing with your statement: Bi men often behave differently than "properly gay men", even if the gay men "are not after the ass" of the hets, that does not mean that Bi males "on the down low" (and I am sure you are familiar with that phrase and term) are not, themselves, willing to cross some boundaries of some breederboys. This happens. And as you likely know, when Pride Parades began, Bi's were treated as second class citizens in the queer community, and many times still are, in a way that echoes people in kink claiming to be "twue" or not. So bearing this in mind, I have to ask you a question ~ If there was a woman you knew, whom always self-identified as queer/lemon, then for romantic reasons, aesthetic reasons, philosphical reasons, kink reasons, any combination of the above, "came out" to her sapphic friends as being significantly "involved" with a male whom identified as "het", they had great sex (including kinky sex), would you support that? Because the "match" was "right", gender politics be damned? As many het people rightfully demand that marriage between queerfolk and even adoption be equally respected, under the aegis of "what matters is how people treat and love each other"? If such a woman had been a domme-dyke and best friend of yours, and said she'd been most happy subbing to a het male (though with the caveat of his being accepted by "The Family" - you know what I mean - as a "queer in spirit") , would you help her celebrate finding this satifaction, or would you be looking for options and reasons to give this new love away?
|