Mercnbeth -> RE: Should a dominant be subjected to the same implements that he subjects his submissive to? (2/7/2007 9:13:43 AM)
|
When this issue reappears, and it does similar to comets, I try to find a different way to express the same thought that I've posted previously. How's this... To submissives... Have you ever been sexually aroused by a spanking? Does the impact a specific implement, paddle, whip, flogger, cane, 2x4; have the potential of arousing you to the point, or over the edge, of climax? Does the application of clamps, steel toothed or the ones with rubber 'training-wheels', with or without weights; applied to tender areas of your body send your brain into a place commonly known as "sub-space"? More than likely if one or more of these results occur with these sensations you identify as a 'bottom' or 'submissive' or maybe you just enjoy it and don't concern yourself with any label. That's GREAT!, ENJOY, have a good time. Now ask the same question to most identifying as dominants, tops, or sensation facilitators and most likely you'll get a very different answer. The point is, you can use the mechanical robot that tests golf clubs to insuring the same power used and the brain of a dominant will not process the sensation as did the brain of a submissive. Further, it is doubtful that any two submissives will process the sensation the same way. This makes any "test", self administered or at the end of a mechanical machine, pretty much meaningless.
|
|
|
|