Kondolinni -> RE: Slavery and Obedience (2/8/2007 8:31:01 AM)
|
The OP is vague. The answer is entirely dependant on the circumstances. What is the relationship of the players? What is the situation? What is the nature of the command? What are the motivations behind the actions/reactions of the players? My lifestyle is 24/7 M/s, so I will address the Q from that point of view. Depending on how demanding a master/mistress or how much of a sadist you are, you have to take into account two things: One is training. The other is what you eventually want to groom your slave into being for you. At the very least, a Dominant's reaction must be tempered in observance to these aspects of his interactions with his submissive/slave. If, for example, in the course of training your slave, a situation where she/he hesitates or disobeys calls for a leanient response, you must give one, even if your personal feelings dictate a firmer response. An obvious case where this would be so would be in ANY situation where a Dominant places a value on his/her submissive/slave trusting in their guidance. Call it "cajolling" if you will, but every culture that has even marginally successfully employed a slave labor force realized that the whip is not always the best way to handle a slave. In my case, engendring trust is important, and what I ultimately seek is a woman enslaved to me through adoration/admiration. To achieve this, I sometimes allow a slave to hesitate without taking immediate umbrage. I do not cajole, nor do I negotiate, but I will discuss, to a point. If, in fact, the conditions are as you described them, and I know the order falls within the accepted limits of my girl, I enforce obedience eventually. Sooner, rather than later, more often than not.
|
|
|
|