quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

He can't run, and if you are familiar with how hard it is to amend the constitution, Arnie would probably be 80 before any such amendment wend its way through the process:

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

He can't run, and if you are familiar with how hard it is to amend the constitution, Arnie would probably be 80 before any such amendment wend its way through the process:

quote:

The first method is for a bill to pass both houses of the legislature, by a two-thirds majority in each. Once the bill has passed both houses, it goes on to the states. This is the route taken by all current amendments. Because of some long outstanding amendments, such as the 27th, Congress will normally put a time limit (typically seven years) for the bill to be approved as an amendment (for example, see the 21st and 22nd).
The second method prescribed is for a Constitutional Convention to be called by two-thirds of the legislatures of the States, and for that Convention to propose one or more amendments. These amendments are then sent to the states to be approved by three-fourths of the legislatures or conventions. This route has never been taken, and there is discussion in political science circles about just how such a convention would be convened, and what kind of changes it would bring about.
Regardless of which of the two proposal routes is taken, the amendment must be ratified, or approved, by three-fourths of states. There are two ways to do this, too. The text of the amendment may specify whether the bill must be passed by the state legislatures or by a state convention. See the Ratification Convention Page for a discussion of the make up of a convention. Amendments are sent to the legislatures of the states by default. Only one amendment, the 21st, specified a convention. In any case, passage by the legislature or convention is by simple majority.
The Constitution, then, spells out four paths for an amendment:

• Proposal by convention of states, ratification by state conventions (never used)
• Proposal by convention of states, ratification by state legislatures (never used)
• Proposal by Congress, ratification by state conventions (used once)
• Proposal by Congress, ratification by state legislatures (used all other times)

It is interesting to note that at no point does the President have a role in the formal amendment process (though he would be free to make his opinion known). He cannot veto an amendment proposal, nor a ratification. This point is clear in Article 5, and was reaffirmed by the Supreme Court in Hollingsworth v Virginia (3 USC 378 [1798]):

http://www.usconstitution.net/constam.html#process

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

He can't run, and if you are familiar with how hard it is to amend the constitution, Arnie would probably be 80 before any such amendment wend its way through the process:

You should know by now that reality and Real0ne's rants seldom overlap.

~stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: missturbation

*******Ok thick person question alert.*******
 
Why can't he run?

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

you just talkin stef or you got something to back it up? 

quote:

Arnie is a nazi. Hell he is even from austrias!  His daddy was anazi ww2 participant!

quote:

Do show your evidence to the contrary!

quote:

ORIGINAL: MasterC70

I don't think it will ever happen. Especially after 9-11.  People would be certain to become suspicious of someone born in another country rising to such a position of power.  Besides which you don't have to be president to be a threat to others who oppose you.  Do the names MacCarthy and Hoover ring any bells?  I believe that one old quote was, "Presidents come and go, but Hoover remains" and of course all Sen.MacCarthy had to do was accuse someone of not being a loyal american, and boom their life was in shreads.  Interestingly enough two young men who worked for MacCarthy later became presidents.  Their names were Richard Nixon and Ronald Reagan.  We don't need to worry about threats coming from without when we already have a time honoured history of generating them from within.  

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

But it seems there are a few like stef for instance above who laugh at this, like its not a reason for concern!

quote:

Julia i know that! 

The point of that post is to wake people up how BIG this is already!  Nazi presidents with nazi cabinets and nazi governors!

quote:

How many elections do we have left before there is enough to get that ratification?  Thats what i want to know?

quote:

America is electing nazis to office how many more are there that we do not know about?

quote:

Did you know anrie was a nazi and directly involved with nazis as is butt head?

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

you just talkin stef or you got something to back it up? 

You've already taken care of that work for me.  You back it up with nearly every post you make.

quote:

Arnie is a nazi. Hell he is even from austrias!  His daddy was anazi ww2 participant!

Since he's from Austria he's a nazi?  That's an interesting leap of "logic," even for you.  As for his father, I wasn't aware that being a nazi was a hereditary condition.

quote:

Do show your evidence to the contrary!

That's not how it works.  You're making the accusations, you're the one who needs to post the proof.  And contrary to your recent efforts at providing proof, random websites from crackpots don't qualify.

~stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: stef

quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne

But it seems there are a few like stef for instance above who laugh at this, like its not a reason for concern!

Once again, you're mistaken.  I'm not laughing at that, I'm laughing at you.

~stef