Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Britain and USA bad for children.


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Britain and USA bad for children. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/15/2007 10:17:07 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

!
Western Civilization and culture: corrupt, evil, and damnable.

Everyone else:  poor people!

Your ideology is showing.  Again.

FirmKY

PS: MsSticks, Ireland is the bomb! 



No. I'm fucking pissed off with western culture because I'm part of it and it does things in my name. If I was an Arab, perhaps I would be pissed off with Arab culture.

The EU threw money at Ireland for years (basically German and British money), it should be doing well.  Then Ireland voted against an EU treaty that would redistribute money to other poor EU countries. I guess that is democracy, fuck everyone else.


If you were Jewish, it would be called "self hatred".  Hatred, of any sort, tends to blind people to facts, and destroys the ability to reason.  Not a good prescription for enlightenment or rationality.

And the reason that Ireland is so wildly successful isn't because the EU "threw money at it", it's because the government and the people embraced capitalism, and an economic system that allows them to flourish.

They owe their success to no one but themselves. 

They are a good lesson in "how things work" that more European governments (and people) should pay attention to.

FirmKY


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/15/2007 10:23:24 AM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
actually, I think Arrafat was far more corrupt.  On any basis you wish to measure.

Meat you could consider that the world system for all its faults feeds close to 6 billion people a day.  That requires a lot of energy and very complex industrial systems.  And saddam was messing with the system.  In a non tech world the earth can sustain fewer than .75 billion humans.  So if the system chrashes over 5 billion people will die slow horrible deaths, doing thier best to stay alive.   In that type of world everything you find fault with the west would be magnified immensly.  Yes, it is not perfect, but it is going to feed 6 billion people tomorrow.   I know it is fun to babble about revolution, it is a cheap easy way of expressing passion.  Similar to an artist using Shock Value because he has nothing real to say.  But it is just hedonism, sitting around talking while enjoying the loot your ancestors stole from around the world.  Let's hear some real ides to improve it.

What would be intersting to me is to see a comparison of Europe as an average( we have to count Mississippi, you have to count Albania, we have to count our illegal immigrants, so do you).  Average the Netherlands with Poland(we have to average Connecticut with Arkansaw) and see how the numbers look.  And/or a break down of all 50 states compared to all the states of Europe. 

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/15/2007 10:28:34 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
Well, this seems to be my thread for agreeing with meat (more rare than Uranium 232).
 
He makes a very valid point about the money thrown at Ireland. It's easy to embrace capitalism, when you are give the money to do it, and outside factors are willing to foot the bill to build a base for that capitalism.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/15/2007 10:28:59 AM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
"The EU threw money at Ireland for years (basically German and British money), it should be doing well.  Then Ireland voted against an EU treaty that would redistribute money to other poor EU countries. I guess that is democracy, fuck everyone else. "

This is an interesting quote.  It implies that Ireland should do as it' told, because it was given money/help.  That there is something wrong about the people of Irelands decision.

Yet this same poster has many time explained that Europe owes nothing to the USA at all.  No allegiance of any kind is deserved for helping them out of WW2, and protecting them from the Soviets. 

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/15/2007 10:35:25 AM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
Ireland has a large cultural resurgance that predates the EU investments.  They helped, but those investments could have come from anywhere.  Do not forget that all of those investments return Money to the investors, back in thier home countries.  France and Germany made money off of Ireland, just like investments in China or Africa, that are often refered to as imperial exploitation/similar terms by a group of posters on here.  The Irish created a safe educated nation of diligent workers, ready and willing to take full advantage of the investment.  They do not owe France or Germany squat.   edited to add---except for political and/or economic deals they agree to.  They do owe more than squat, but if it ain't in a contract they don't owe it.  No allegiance/inherent inferiority.

< Message edited by luckydog1 -- 2/15/2007 10:38:19 AM >

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/15/2007 11:03:42 AM   
MzMia


Posts: 5333
Joined: 7/30/2004
Status: offline
No Child Left Behind has been a huge failure.
The American Schools overall are failing miserably.
The Failing Educational System in America!

_____________________________

Namaste'
To Each His/Her Own
"DENIAL ain't just a river in Egypt." Mark Twain


What's your favorite fetish?
"My partner's whisper"--bloomswell

(in reply to asubmissiveheart)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/15/2007 11:14:25 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

"The EU threw money at Ireland for years (basically German and British money), it should be doing well.  Then Ireland voted against an EU treaty that would redistribute money to other poor EU countries. I guess that is democracy, fuck everyone else. "

This is an interesting quote.  It implies that Ireland should do as it' told, because it was given money/help.  That there is something wrong about the people of Irelands decision.

Yet this same poster has many time explained that Europe owes nothing to the USA at all.  No allegiance of any kind is deserved for helping them out of WW2, and protecting them from the Soviets. 


Actually it is dismay that a country was given so much money to develop its economy and when it came for that money to go elsewhere those people couldn't bring itself to allow the same be given to another country at its expense.

My parent's generation were deeply grateful to the US but how many generations have to be grateful and slavishly go along with US policy even if they see that policy is way out of line with their own values? I feel exactly the same about Britain at this moment in time as the US. Iraq is an illegal war and is fought for oil by an oligarchy of Americans and it is sick.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/15/2007 11:17:11 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1

Ireland has a large cultural resurgance that predates the EU investments.  They helped, but those investments could have come from anywhere.  Do not forget that all of those investments return Money to the investors, back in thier home countries.  France and Germany made money off of Ireland, just like investments in China or Africa, that are often refered to as imperial exploitation/similar terms by a group of posters on here.  The Irish created a safe educated nation of diligent workers, ready and willing to take full advantage of the investment.  They do not owe France or Germany squat.   edited to add---except for political and/or economic deals they agree to.  They do owe more than squat, but if it ain't in a contract they don't owe it.  No allegiance/inherent inferiority.


You are talking bullshit on this one. The money was given to Ireland, not loaned or invested with an expected return. The whole point of it was to build up its infrastructure to attract inward investment. Portugal got the same. The idea was that new members of the EU should get it too but Ireland voted against it in a referendum and in effect vetoed those countries getting the same money they got.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/15/2007 11:22:11 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

If you were Jewish, it would be called "self hatred".  Hatred, of any sort, tends to blind people to facts, and destroys the ability to reason.  Not a good prescription for enlightenment or rationality.

And the reason that Ireland is so wildly successful isn't because the EU "threw money at it", it's because the government and the people embraced capitalism, and an economic system that allows them to flourish.

They owe their success to no one but themselves. 

They are a good lesson in "how things work" that more European governments (and people) should pay attention to.

FirmKY



That whole Jewish self hatred stuff is bullshit. As an acquintence of mine says when he hears that phrase, it is about shutting Jews up who don't believe in the Zionist crap.

A country can embrace capitalism as much as it wants, if it hasn't got an infrastructure, investment or a market, its going nowhere. The Irish are enthusiatic believers in the EU because they know he EU played a big part in Ireland's success. Now if you want to hear the alternative view of the EU, you might be better off asking NG.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/15/2007 2:01:04 PM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline
meatcleaver said:
quote:

Because the USA doesn't in anyway believe in any international treaty that might one day lead to the construction of an international court that might try US citizens.

Good! Let’s hope the majority of the citizens of this country stay smart enough to keep it that way. I can think of few things dumber that ceding your sovereignty to other nations.

cyberdude611 said:
quote:

And there are two reasons the US will oppose any international criminal court:
1. It would violate the US Constitution. The US Constitution states that the Supreme Court is the highest law of the land.
2. The US would be the target of political persecution.

Amen!

meatcleaver said:
quote:

1. Covenient 2. Bullshit It would mean Presidents would have to consider the possiblility they might end up being tried for war crimes if they started an illegal war. Well, let's be honest, laws are to stop illegal acts, that is not persecution.

1. Yes, sovereignty is always inconvenient to those who want to fuck over others.

2. It would mean that Presidents would be hamstringed in acting in the best interests of the country. It would mean that those who control the court would have the power to persecute political and economic rivals. You don’t seriously believe that an international court would be corruption free, do you? What if America ends up controlling the court, will you be in favor of it then?
quote:

LOL Look how the USA was created, bloodshed and conquest and genocide! The USA has proved to be no better than Europe and to point at history to justify present adventures is a laugh! The1812 war was the first US imperial war when it tried to annex Canada so the idea the USA somehow believes in blissful isolation is an even bigger laugh.

You need to brush up on history. I won’t deny the USA is not without sin but then who is? As for the War of 1812. We did not draw first blood. Britain did when it armed Indian tribes along the border and incited them to attack the U.S. Britain also violated the Treaty of Paris when it failed to turn over several fortifications it was required to. Britain also attacked U.S. shipping and impressed (a nice word for enslaved) U.S. sailors and merchantmen.

_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/15/2007 2:16:12 PM   
NorthernGent


Posts: 8730
Joined: 7/10/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1


The Irish created a safe educated nation of diligent workers, ready and willing to take full advantage of the investment.  They do not owe France or Germany squat.  



You're dreaming pal. The Germans are the largest contributors to the EU. The largest per head are the Dutch. Britain also contributes a hefty sum. Guess where the Irish government raised funds from - the EU.

I've nothing against the Irish, they're a sound bunch. Facts are facts however.

_____________________________

I have the courage to be a coward - but not beyond my limits.

Sooner or later, the man who wins is the man who thinks he can.

(in reply to luckydog1)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/15/2007 2:55:50 PM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b

1. Yes, sovereignty is always inconvenient to those who want to fuck over others.


Unless you are Iraq of course. And maybe Iran and who knows, Venezeula?


quote:

ORIGINAL: Marc2b
2. It would mean that Presidents would be hamstringed in acting in the best interests of the country. It would mean that those who control the court would have the power to persecute political and economic rivals. You don’t seriously believe that an international court would be corruption free, do you? What if America ends up controlling the court, will you be in favor of it then?
quote:

LOL Look how the USA was created, bloodshed and conquest and genocide! The USA has proved to be no better than Europe and to point at history to justify present adventures is a laugh! The1812 war was the first US imperial war when it tried to annex Canada so the idea the USA somehow believes in blissful isolation is an even bigger laugh.



You need to brush up on history. I won’t deny the USA is not without sin but then who is? As for the War of 1812. We did not draw first blood. Britain did when it armed Indian tribes along the border and incited them to attack the U.S. Britain also violated the Treaty of Paris when it failed to turn over several fortifications it was required to. Britain also attacked U.S. shipping and impressed (a nice word for enslaved) U.S. sailors and merchantmen.


LOL All that was sorted out but used as an excuse to attack and annex Canada, rather like the WMD excuse in Iraq. I'll have to find you the book in question, written by an American historian who wanted to put right his country's jingoistic history.

_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to Marc2b)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/15/2007 6:26:07 PM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MzMia
No Child Left Behind has been a huge failure.
The American Schools overall are failing miserably.
The Failing Educational System in America!


As a person that graduated from a good'ol' average, public school not that long ago, I just don't agree.
 
There is nothing wrong with the schools. There is something wrong with parents that are willing to blame teacher when their children fail, and children that disrespect their teacher ... and by the way, those two tend to manifest together.

(in reply to MzMia)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/15/2007 10:50:22 PM   
Marc2b


Posts: 6660
Joined: 8/7/2006
Status: offline
quote:


Unless you are Iraq of course. And maybe Iran and who knows, Venezeula?

You’re proving my point. By the way, now that Venezuelan "President" Hugo Chavez can rule by decree, is it legit to call him Venezuelan Dictator Hugo Chavez? Seems legit to me.
quote:

LOL All that was sorted out but used as an excuse to attack and annex Canada, rather like the WMD excuse in Iraq. I'll have to find you the book in question, written by an American historian who wanted to put right his country's jingoistic history.

I hope it’s not "A people’s History of America," by Howard Zinn. If it is, don’t bother. Howard Zinn isn’t just your run of the mill radical left-winger. He is an off the deep end and fifty fathoms deep total nutcase of a left-winger. He has no credibility with me. Realone, however, would probably love him.

Yes there were those who saw the war as a means to annex Canada (although the Carribean was the real prize, that’s where the money was). People seeking to take advantage of a situation for personal gain is nothing new. This doesn’t change the fact that the U.S. had genuine grievances with Britain. Whether those grievances justified war or not is endlessly debatable but in my opinion somebody snatching your citizens away is plenty reason to be pissed off.

Sorry about the cheap shot there, Realone.

_____________________________

Do you know what the most awesome thing about being an Atheist is? You're not required to hate anybody!

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/16/2007 12:25:54 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

That whole Jewish self hatred stuff is bullshit. As an acquintence of mine says when he hears that phrase, it is about shutting Jews up who don't believe in the Zionist crap.


Well, since you aren't jewish, and don't seem to know what an analogy is, I guess I'll just let this one pass.

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

A country can embrace capitalism as much as it wants, if it hasn't got an infrastructure, investment or a market, its going nowhere.


Basic misunderstanding of how the world works.

You don't become capitalist when you have "infrastructure, investment or a market".  You build infrastructure, investments and markets when you become capitalist.

Recent examples:

Japan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Singapore, Taiwan etc.

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

The Irish are enthusiatic believers in the EU because they know he EU played a big part in Ireland's success. Now if you want to hear the alternative view of the EU, you might be better off asking NG.


Well, as part of the EU, I'm sure it's played some part.  But not necessarily a always a postive one.

But, you know, what's always been interesting to me is that you can pour a fortune into some societies, and reap nothing but corruption, bribery and wasted resources.  In other societies a small amount can turn a nation on it's head in a positive way.

When it goes bad, it's always the locals fault.  When things go good, it's rarely to their credit.  Strange.

Ahh, well, the Irish and all of those massive EU funds:

1.   Many outside observers attribute Ireland's success in improving its standard of living over the last 15 years to subsidies from the EU. In fact, though, EU subsidies do nothing but hinder consumer-satisfying economic development.  Source.

2.  The European think tank WorkForAll studied the factors involved in the differential growth rates of European countries, and concluded that 93% of Ireland's differential economic performance was attributable to improvements in taxation and decreased public spending beginning in 1985. Source, Source.

3.  Some external observers are inclined to ascribe a large part of Ireland’s success in the 1990s to EU economic transfers, but their role can be over­stated. EU membership has been very positive for Ireland, providing market access, enhancing Ire­land’s national status, and contributing to the bud­get. While net receipts from the EU averaged 4 percent of GDP over an extended period, studies have shown that these contributions added about 0.5 percent per year to the growth rate, while the growth has averaged over 6.5 percent per year since 1987. Comparable transfers were made to other poorer EU states, such as Greece, Portugal, and Spain, but none of these countries achieved similar growth. Source.
FirmKY

_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/16/2007 1:20:28 AM   
luckydog1


Posts: 2736
Joined: 1/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: NorthernGent

quote:

ORIGINAL: luckydog1


The Irish created a safe educated nation of diligent workers, ready and willing to take full advantage of the investment.  They do not owe France or Germany squat.  



You're dreaming pal. The Germans are the largest contributors to the EU. The largest per head are the Dutch. Britain also contributes a hefty sum. Guess where the Irish government raised funds from - the EU.

I've nothing against the Irish, they're a sound bunch. Facts are facts however.


Facts are indeed facts, and the fact is Ireland owes no special obediance to Germany and France, anymore than the UN does to the USA for picking up most of the tab.  France and Germany wanted Ireland in, for thier own reasons.  Ireland is now in and gets a full vote.  Just like France does in the UN and Mississippi does in the USA.  Get over it.  The little nations of Europe have no desire whatsoever to be run from Berlin or Paris, they do want a nice trading zone.  That's why they like to have US bases.  I would imagine they would feel uneasy about the Europeon Left's happiness with them being held in totalitarian states so Russia can have its buffer, which would also make a US base a nice thing.

(in reply to NorthernGent)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/16/2007 3:06:47 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY





1.   Many outside observers attribute Ireland's success in improving its standard of living over the last 15 years to subsidies from the EU. In fact, though, EU subsidies do nothing but hinder consumer-satisfying economic development.  Source.

2.  The European think tank WorkForAll studied the factors involved in the differential growth rates of European countries, and concluded that 93% of Ireland's differential economic performance was attributable to improvements in taxation and decreased public spending beginning in 1985. Source, Source.

3.  Some external observers are inclined to ascribe a large part of Ireland’s success in the 1990s to EU economic transfers, but their role can be over­stated. EU membership has been very positive for Ireland, providing market access, enhancing Ire­land’s national status, and contributing to the bud­get. While net receipts from the EU averaged 4 percent of GDP over an extended period, studies have shown that these contributions added about 0.5 percent per year to the growth rate, while the growth has averaged over 6.5 percent per year since 1987. Comparable transfers were made to other poorer EU states, such as Greece, Portugal, and Spain, but none of these countries achieved similar growth. Source.


FirmKY


I've read the sources which aren't that credible. If you look at Portugal, Spain and Ireland since their entry into the EU, all three made great advances and the only common factor is the EU and EU money. All three countries are virtually unrecognizable from their point of entry. Apart from the EU investment without being a member of the EU Ireland wouldn't have much of its market. Since much of the EU money was spent on infrastructure, roads to schools and whatever else a modern economy requires, one wouldn't expect it to show in growth but without it Ireland's growth would not have been able to be sustained.  As for Portugal and Spain not showing the same growth rate, you are talking about a country like Ireland were 30% of its population are in one city and then comparing that to a large country with large infrastructure problems. Should you compare Dublin to Barcelona, Madrid or Lisbon, I bet all three would have out performed Dublin. The surprise really for Ireland is that it had taken so long to perform, most small countries in western Europe of comparable size are far richer.

LOL forget that last sentence, I can only think of Denmark and Norway. Actually Catalonia which is a semi-autonomous region of Spain outperformed Ireland by a long way. However, if EU investment wasn't worth that much then that makes the Irish just that little bit more selfish at denying new countries that money to rebuild their infrastructure.



< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 2/16/2007 3:30:54 AM >


_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/16/2007 3:27:55 AM   
MsStick


Posts: 80
Joined: 5/4/2006
From: Ireland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

The EU threw money at Ireland for years (basically German and British money), it should be doing well.  Then Ireland voted against an EU treaty that would redistribute money to other poor EU countries. I guess that is democracy, fuck everyone else.


So it's EU money that has made us care for our children?  What a load of shite!  Irish culture traditionally has a very strong childcare element, particularly in rural areas where community is still stronger than anything else (which can have its downside too).

The EU can throw money at any country it likes, Ireland voting against the Nice treaty (which is I presume what you referred to?) has no impact on that.  The people voted against LOSING OUR NEUTRALITY which was the main concern with the Nice treaty from Ireland's sake.  Of course, our govt is as corrupt as anybody elses, and our esteemed leaders decided we obviously made a mistake with our first vote, caved to EU pressure and made us all vote again, with added brainwashing and scare mongering to steer the sheeple in the direction they wanted Ireland to go.    In that second vote, proud Ireland bowed Herself to the EU's demands. 

Of course, our people's determined neutrality isn't worth a damn thing to Ahern and his ilk, who willingly bend over for Bush and the CIA to use Shannon as a stop-over for military and political missions.  But that's a whole different story.

_____________________________

Ms. Stick

Is Minic a bhris béal duine a shrón!
It's often that people's mouths break their noses!

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/16/2007 3:36:31 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MsStick

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

The EU threw money at Ireland for years (basically German and British money), it should be doing well.  Then Ireland voted against an EU treaty that would redistribute money to other poor EU countries. I guess that is democracy, fuck everyone else.


So it's EU money that has made us care for our children?  What a load of shite!  Irish culture traditionally has a very strong childcare element, particularly in rural areas where community is still stronger than anything else (which can have its downside too).

Really don't know where you are coming from here. No one mentioned anything about that.

The EU can throw money at any country it likes, Ireland voting against the Nice treaty (which is I presume what you referred to?) has no impact on that.  The people voted against LOSING OUR NEUTRALITY which was the main concern with the Nice treaty from Ireland's sake.  Of course, our govt is as corrupt as anybody elses, and our esteemed leaders decided we obviously made a mistake with our first vote, caved to EU pressure and made us all vote again, with added brainwashing and scare mongering to steer the sheeple in the direction they wanted Ireland to go.    In that second vote, proud Ireland bowed Herself to the EU's demands. 

My feelings are if you don't like the EU, leave. Britain has the same attitude but for some reason they refuse to leave too.

Of course, our people's determined neutrality isn't worth a damn thing to Ahern and his ilk, who willingly bend over for Bush and the CIA to use Shannon as a stop-over for military and political missions.  But that's a whole different story.

If you want neutrality perhaps you shouldn't join an organisation such as the EU and remain neutral like Switzerland.


_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to MsStick)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Britain and USA bad for children. - 2/16/2007 3:40:52 AM   
MsStick


Posts: 80
Joined: 5/4/2006
From: Ireland
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

The surprise really for Ireland is that it had taken so long to perform, most small countries in western Europe of comparable size are far richer.



Lol, yes, forget that last sentence indeed.  Basic geography will tell you that trading from Ireland, which is not just part of Western Europe but is actually the westernest part of western Europe, and has 2 seas to cross to even get to mainland europe, is going to be more time consuming and expensive, and therefore more prohibitive, than from Portugal, Spain, or Greece.  I have a lot of experience in the Irish haulage industry, and Irish-Continental hauliers have to work twice as hard for half as much.

_____________________________

Ms. Stick

Is Minic a bhris béal duine a shrón!
It's often that people's mouths break their noses!

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Britain and USA bad for children. Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094