mp072004
Posts: 381
Joined: 12/22/2005 Status: offline
|
Biting is non-submissive if it hasn't been requested, and biting is antithetical to submission if it has been prohibited. If biting has been requested, it's not obedient, thus not submissive, to NOT bite. (Disclaimer: it's perfectly fine to refuse requests, because you're a grown-up and responsible for your own decisions, and as far as I'm concerned, you may refuse and continue to identify as a submissive person, etc. Now, back to our regularly scheduled drivel.) If a dominant asks his or her submissive to perform oral sex on him or her, is that "undominant?" After all, this would involve the dominant requesting a type of sensation and receiving it from the submissive. Now, there is a small contingent who will say that getting-done-to is submissive and doing-to is dominant. However, on account of reading thread after thread about whether dominant women are allowed to suck submissive cock, I'm getting the impression that receiving sensation = submissive is not a widespread idea. If a dominant may request a blowjob, and a submissive may continue to submit while complying with that request, then she or he may request a bite and the submissive may comply with that request and still be submitting, no? Monica P.S. Force/rough/primal/ravishment play is great fun, too, and it's kind of silly to do force play with someone who isn't struggling and fighting at all. It's often hotter if a person is resisting well, and that resistance does often involve biting and punching--which people who don't usually like being bitten and punched will often enjoy in the context of resistance.
|