Stephann -> RE: Keepin'It Real - Locate Offenders in your area! (2/23/2007 8:57:35 AM)
|
The conversations we've had regarding the impossibility of rehabilitation don't hold water. The pedophile doesn't 'need' to abuse children, they are simply more prone to do so. The statement "I hate myself, but I can't change" is a psychological coping mechanism; in not recognizing the possibility of improving their lives, they feel they have no direct responsibility for their actions; thus they subconsciously enable themselves to do it. The way we refer to them as 'sickos' further isolates them from society; they see no reason to even attempt to change, because they already wear a permanent brand (legally, and psychologically.) It goes back to capital punishment as a deterrent; it's only a deterrent to someone who hasn't committed murder yet. For someone already clearly guilty and convicted, what incentive does such a person have to live within the legal boundaries of society? As suggested, dumping them all on 'some island' without children, would ensure that no children are abused; thus there is no actual need to abuse. Rehabilitation won't come from such a practice, it comes from giving these men something to gain (their freedom) and holding something over their head (repeat offenses; castration, death, whatever.) As I suggested earlier, we have sufficient technology today to, for half the cost of putting them in prison, fit them with a biometric monitor (heart rate, breathing, audio recording, GPS) on every single criminal we release. We've already established that we are willing to place monitoring restrictions well after their release them in the first place. Biometric monitoring would allow triggers for when biological reactions (similar to those experienced by pedophiles) combined with real time audio recordings (with sensors for alerts when, say, children's voices are caught) would be more than adequate to give law enforcement officials REAL tools to ensure that these men do not commit the crime again. The man in question, knowing he is always -ALWAYS- being watched, has a very powerful incentive not to engage in any sort of criminal behavior. Obviously, this won't work for all men, but it can certainly save the public money and cut down on the overall fear factor (by, hopefully, an overall drop in repeat offenses.) Simply put, the system as we have it, encourages even greater disrespect for the law; we glorify vigilante justice on television, in music, in movies, but this isn't 'justice' by any sort. When we've started throwing stones through a pedophile's window to try to drive him away, we are also breaking the law. Learning to break the law, by attacking child molesters, shows people (especially our children) that the law only matters to some, and not others. It encourages people to take the law into their own hands; next thing you know, you have parents, friends, and business partners being killed or attacked because the attitude is "If I think you don't belong here, I can do whatever I want." We're already seen as a nation of bullies; do we really want to make it worse? Stephan
|
|
|
|